Advanced Search Results

Anil Singh Vs. Smt. KholbaharIn Bai and State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Contract

Reported in : AIR2009Chh6

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Sanjay K. Agrawal

Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.1. The unsuccessful plaintiff in a suit for specific performance of contract is the appellant before us.2. The appellant/plaintiff instituted Civil Suit No. 4-A/2005 in the Court of VIIIth Additional District Judge, Bilaspur...

Divisional Forest Officer (Territorial) Vs. Fagua Sai

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 2008ACJ2074; [2008(116)FLR1071]; 2008(1)MPHT60(CG)

ORDERD.R. Deshmukh, J.1. Heard.2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 21-7-1988 passed by the Court of Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Labour Court, Bilaspur, M.P. (hereinafter referred to as the 'Lower Court') in Case No....

Smt Purnima Bai and Others Vs. Onkar Singh and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Sanjay S. Agrawal, Ms. Sharmila Singhai

(MISC APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT 1988)RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J.1. This is claimants' appeal for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the 11th Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raipur (for short `the Tribunal')...

M/s. Panch Raghou Taank Ramnivas Sarda and Co. Vs. Hindustan Petroleum ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The substantial question of law formulated and to be answered by this Court in this plaintiffs second appeal is as under: “Whether both the Courts below are justified in dismissing the plaintiffs suit holding that...

Saduram Vs. Tikeshwar Dead Through Legal Representatives and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Instant plaintiff's second appeal arises against the judgment and decree dated 6-4-1988 passed by the Ist Additional District Judge to the Court of District Judge, Raigarh in Civil Appeal No. 89-A/1979. 2. Facts of the...

Jagdish Sahu Vs. 1 State of Chhattisgarh Through Defendants the Collec ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Rajeev Shrivastav

HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR First Appeal No 93 of 2012 Jagdish Sahu ...Petitioners Versus 1 State of Chhattisgarh through Defendants the Collector District Durg CG 2 Kasturchand Loda 3 Fatte Lal Loda 4 M...

Bharat Aluminium Co. Ltd. Vs. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services, Inc ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(5), 2(7), 9, 10, 34, 37(1), 44, 48, 48(1), 49, 53 and 58; Arbitration Act, 1940

Reported in : AIR2005Chh21; 2006(1)MPHT18(CG)

Advocate for Respondent : Ravish Agrawal, Sr. Counsel and; Sanjay S. Agrawal, Adv.

A.K. Patnaik, C.J. 37(1)(b)2. The facts briefly are that an agreement dated 22-4-1993 was executed between the appellant and the respondent under which the respondent was to supply installed equipment for modernization and upgradation of the...

Shiv Kumar Chandrakar Vs. Shashikala Alias Devyani

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10 and 13; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT9(CG)

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay S. Agrawal, Adv.

V.K. Shrivastava, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 26-7-1993 passed by the 3rd Additional District Judge, Raipur in Civil Suit No. 159/1991, by which the petition filed by the appellant for...

Banwari Lal Shrivastava Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966 - Rule 9

Reported in : [2005(104)FLR20]; 2004(4)MPHT53(CG)

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay S. Agrawal, Govt. Adv.

ORDERFakhruddin, J.1. Applications for urgent hearing are allowed.2. Heard.3. The petitioner, who was Naib Tehsildar, was prosecuted for an offence punishable under Sections 5 (1) (d) and 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947....

Santosh Kumar Tripathi Vs. Smt. Saroj Tripathi

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 13(1) and 23(1)

Reported in : AIR2006Chh16

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay S. Agrawal, Adv.

V.K. Shrivastava, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 23-6-2004 passed by Vth Additional District Judge. Durg (CG) in Civil Suit No. 2A/2003 whereby the stilt for grant of divorce has...