Advanced Search Results

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Skipper Construction and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilCommercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 129, 136 and 142; Companies Act, 1956; Public Premises Evicion Act

Reported in : 119(2005)DLT331(SC); JT2005(4)SC455

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. There are some cases which at times strengthen the idea that existing laws may be inadequate to grant relief to persons whom, the court feels genuinely to be entitled to relief. Courts, more...

B.D. Shetty and ors. Vs. M/S Ceat Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationLabour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 10-A, 10-A(A), 10-A(1) and 10-A(3); Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Bombay Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Rules, 1959

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)53; AIR2001SC2953; [2002(93)FLR785]; 2001LabIC4000; (2001)IILLJ1552SC; 2001(7)SCALE513; (2002)1SCC193; 2002(1)LC401(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv., ; Rajan Narain and ; Ms Sushma Sharma

Shivaraj V. Patil, J. 1. Leave granted.2. The question whether the 'delay' in completion of disciplinary proceedings directly attributable to the conduct of a workman under Section 10A(1)(b) of Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 also...

Textiles Labour Association Vs. Padmaben Manilal Parmar and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2F, 2J, 9 to 19 and 25F; ;Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 2 and 22; ;Societies Registration Act, 1860; Bombay Industrial Relation Act, 1946; Charitable and Religious Endowments Act; Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan (Service Regulations) 1987; ;Nehru Yuva Kendra Sanghatan Rules; ;Constitution of India - Articles 31(2), 141, 226, 227, 310 and 311

Reported in : (2007)1GLR527

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Clerk, Adv. for Respondent 1

H.K. Rathod, J. 1. Heard the learned advocate Mr. D.S. Vasavada appearing on behalf of the petitioner - Textiles Labour Association and learned advocate Mr. A.K. Clerk appearing on behalf of the respondent - workman.2. The...

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 47, 48A and 51A; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25B, and 25F; The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Environment Protection Act, 1986

Reported in : AIR1997SC734; (1996)8SCC462; [1996]Supp10SCR973

Advocate for Respondent : D.V. Seghal, ; P.P. Malhotra, ; Arun Jaitley, ;

ORDERKuldip Singh, J.1. Taj Mahal - The Taj - is the 'King Emperor' amongst the World-Wonders. The Taj is the final achievement and acme of the Moghul Article It represents the most refined aesthetic values. It...

M/S. Bata India Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 7B, 2(s); Shops and Establishment Act

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjay Parikh; Mr. Abinash Mishra; Ms. Mamta Saxena; Ms. Soumya Roy, Advs.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes1. The present writ...

Food Corporation of India and ors. Vs. Bhanu Lodh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Food Corporation Act, 1964 - Sections 6, 6(1), 6(2), 12, 12A, 13, 45 and 45(2); Food Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1971 - Regulation 7(2); Constitution of India - Article 14; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 78A and 78(1)

Reported in : AIR2005SC2775; 2005(2)AWC1296(SC); (2005)2CALLT96(SC); 2005(3)ESC297; [2005(105)FLR1058]; JT2005(2)SC562; (2005)3SCC618; 2005(2)SLJ198(SC); 2005(2)LC783(SC); (2005)2UPLBEC1; [2005] 2 SCR 350

Advocate for Respondent : Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv., ; Sanjay Parikh, ; Anil Hooda, ;

ORDERIn exercise of the powers conferred by Section 6(2) of the Food Corporation Act, 1964, the Central Government is pleased to issue/reiterate the following policy instructions to the Food Corporation of India:-i. There shall not be...

Hindustan Paper Corporation Vs. Purnendu Chakrobarty and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Hindustan Paper Corporation Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules - Rules 23(E) and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 1996VIIIAD(SC)122; [1997(75)FLR22]; JT1996(10)SC1; (1997)IILLJ704SC; 1996(8)SCALE96; (1996)11SCC404; [1996]Supp8SCR159; 1997(1)LC369(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Parikh, Adv.

K. Venkataswami, J. 1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties at length.3. The appellant-Corporation on January 5, 1989 passed an order invoking Rule 23(vi)(E) of the Hindustan Paper Corporation Conduct Discipline and Appeal Rules...

State of Karnataka Vs. Ameer Jan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 6(2), 7, 13(1), 13(2), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(3) and 19(4); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 4 and 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197 and 197(1)

Reported in : AIR2008SC108; 2008CriLJ347; JT2007(7)SC183; 2008(1)KarLJ33; 2007(11)SCALE207

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Parikh, ; A.M. Singh and ; Jitin Sahni, Advs.

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Interpretation and/ or application of the provisions of Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act') falls for our consideration in this appeal which arises out of a...

State of M.P. and anr Vs. Medha Patkar and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Section 3(2); PESA Act - Sections 3 and 4(i); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 18; Environment (Protection) Rules 1986 - Rule 5(3); Government of Madhya Pradeh Business Rules.

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjay Parikh

1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been preferred by the State of Madhya Pradesh and instrumentality of the State against the judgment and order dated 11.11.2009 in Writ Petition (C) No.6056 of 2009 of the...

M/S. Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. Vs. Jan Chetna and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Sanjay Parikh

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8288 OF 201.(Arising out of SLP (C) No.27387 of 2012) M/s. Monnet Ispat and Energy Limited ....Appellant versus Jan Chetna and others ....Respondents ORDER...