Advanced Search Results

Sanjay Dutt and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi (Stf), Bomb ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA Act), 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 2, 5, 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a), 3, 7; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Section 4

 P. Sathasivam, J.1) Mr. Harish Salve, Mr. Surendra Singh, Mr. B.H. Marlapalle learned senior counsel appeared for A-117, A-118, A-124 respectively and Mr. Raval, learned ASG duly assisted by Mr. Satyakam, learned counsel appeared for the...

Sanjay Dutt Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Cbi,bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

APPEALS FILED UNDER ARMS ACT/EXPLOSIVE SUBSTANCES ACT PART-6 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1060 of 2007 Sanjay Dutt (A-117) .... Appellant(s) vs. The State of Maharashtra, through CBI (STF),...

State of Maharashtra Vs. Bharat Chaganlal Raghani and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 23, 34, 114, 120S, 302, 306, 307 and 384; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 5, 25(1-B) and 27; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(2), (3), (5), (I), 5, 6 and 15(1), (2) and (3); Constitution of India - Sections 19; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules - Rule 15(2), (3) and (5); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 17; Immoral Traffic Act, 1956 - Sections 13; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161 and 222(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 145

Reported in : AIR2002SC409; 2001(2)ALD(Cri)297; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1903(SC); 2002(5)BomCR45; 2002CriLJ944; 2001(3)Crimes234(SC); JT2001(5)SC346; 2001(4)SCALE285; (2001)9SCC1; [2001]3SCR840

Sethi. J.1. Under the heaps of voluminous record in the form of various paper books spread over thousands of pages, lies the hidden story relating to the new 'merchants of death and destruction'. Upon dissection, when...

Kumar Ram Nandan Vs. Fulid Power Private Limited and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1) and 12(5)

Reported in : (1995)IIILLJ347Bom

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Kadam, Adv. for ;P.R. Dalmia, Adv., i/b., Dalmia & Co. for Respondent No. 1

Kantharia, J.1. The petitioner was employed as a helper by the first respondent in the year 1965 on permanent basis. He was served with a charge-sheet dated 7th November, 1975 alleging that he threw away and...

Ramchandra Mahadev Jagpat and ors. Vs. Chief Executive Officer and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Slum Area (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971 - Sections 3 and 13; Maharashtra Government Rules and Regulations; D.C. Regulations - Regulation 33(10)

Reported in : AIR2007SC650; JT2007(3)SC413; 2006(12)SCALE33; (2006)11SCC661

ORDERHeard Mr. L.N.Rao, senior advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sanjay V. Khande, Mr. B.S.Rao and Ms. Indra Sawhney, advocates accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. We also heard their submissions. By a prayer...

The State of Maharshtra and ors Vs. Santosh Manohar Chavan and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 366, 368, 164, 161, 313, 354 (3); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302, 201, 364A, 394, 397, 404, 201(I), 201(II), 212, 120B rw 34; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 5, 6 rw 25,

1. These references for confirmation under Section 366 of the Criminal Procedure Code (the Code for short) arise from the separate order of conviction and sentence passed on 26/5/2009 by the learned Additional Session Judge, Sindhudurg...

Sunil and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

S.S. Shinde, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the appellants-original accused, who are convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 498A r/w 34, 302 r/w 34 of I.P. Code. 2. The brief facts of the...

Rajendra Govindrao Kunde and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicants, the learned A.P.P and learned counsel for the intervener. 2. By this application, the applicants seek their enlargement on bail in connection with C.R. No.190 of 2013, registered...

Vanashakti versus Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 760

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Aishwariya Bhati, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Ms. Mili Baxi, Ms. Harshita Choubey, Ms. Chitransha Singh Sikarwar, Ms. Saakhsi Saboo, Ms. Sonam Singh, Ms. Vaibhavi Bhalerao, Ms. Devanshi Singh, M/s. Trilegal, Ms. Srishti Agnihotri, Ms. Anna Oommen

[2025] 8 S.C.R. 760 : 2025 INSC 961Vanashakti v. Union of India (Writ Petition (C) No. 166 of 2025) 05 August 2025 [B.R. Gavai,* CJI and K. Vinod Chandran, J.]Issue for Consideration The present petition challenges...