Advanced Search Results
M.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Pandey Construction Co.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-13-2005
LimitationCivil
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2); Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 - Sections 3, 7, 7A, 7B, 7B(2A), 9, 10, 16, 17, 17A, 18, 19, 19(1), 20, 22, 23, 24(1), 24(2), 42, 65, 84C and 211; Rent Control Act; Representation of People Act - Sections 81, 82, 86, 86(1) and 117; Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 28 and 28(4); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 19; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act - Sections 13(1), 13(5) and 13(6); Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 18; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(35); Rajasthan Premises Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1950 - Sections 13(4); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 34(1) and 34(3); Ciminal Procedure Code - Sections 340, 342, 344, 345, 34
2005(2)MPHT206; 2005(2)MPLJ550
K.C. Ghildiyal, Adv. in C.R. No. 633/2003, ;Sanjay K. Yadav, Govt. Adv. in C.R. No. 1000/2003, ;V.R. Rao, Adv. in C.R. Nos. 1119 and 1330/2003 and ;V.R. Rao, Adv. in C.R. No. 151/2004
ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. In C.R. No. 1330/2003 question has been referred for consideration of Larger Bench as to applicability of Section 5 of Limitation Act to a revision preferred under Section 19 of M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamdas Vs. State of M.P.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-28-2003
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 17(1), 23(1A), 23(2) and 28; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984
2003(3)MPHT301; 2003(3)MPLJ428; 2009AIRSCW604
Sanjay K. Yadav, Govt. Adv.
Dipak Misra, J. 1. These two appeals preferred under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') being interlinked and interconnected and having arisen out of a singular award dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLaxmi Narayan Hayaran Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-29-2004
Service
Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966 - Rule 19; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rule 19; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7 and 13(1)
[2005(105)FLR861]; (2005)IIILLJ212MP; 2004(4)MPHT343; 2004(4)MPLJ555
Sanjay K. Yadav, Govt. Adv.
ORDERR.V. Raveendran, C.J.1. The petitioner was working as an Accountant in the Office of the Conservator of Forests, Bhopal Division. He was caught in a bribery trap laid by the Lokayu,kta Police. A challan (charge-sheet) under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›