Advanced Search Results
Satendra Mani Tiwari Vs. Commissioner, Gorakhpur Division and ors.
Allahabad
Apr-15-2004
Property
Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 27(4)
2004(3)AWC2668
Sanjay Goswami, Adv., ;D.K. Yadav, Adv. and ;S.W. Ali, S.C.
Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri N.C. Rajvanshi senior advocate, assisted by Sri J.B. Mishra, on behalf of the petitioner, standing counsel on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Sri Sanjay Goswami, Advocate on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAniruddha Kumar and Ashwini Kumar Vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Author ...
Allahabad
Jul-19-2000
CivilProperty
Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 27, 33, 47A and 47A(1); Stamp Rules, 1899 - Rules 340 to 350; Urban Area Zamindari Abolition Act - Sections 64; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari and Land Reforms Act - Sections 143
2000(3)AWC2587
S.C., Sanjay Goswami, Adv.
D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner had purchased 500 square meters of land out of plot No. 412/0/15-0 situated in Phulpur town area, Allahabad under registered sale deed on 1st May. 1992, setting forth Rs. 50.000 as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Shakira Khatoon Kazmi and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-07-2001
Property
Constitution of India - Article 14; Government Grants Act, 1895 - Sections 2 and 3; Uttar Pradesh Government Grants (Amendment) Act, 1960
2002(1)AWC226
Ashok Mehta, ;Sanjay Goswami and ;Shakeel Ahmad Almi, Advs.
G.P. Mathur, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed for quashing of the Government order dated 15.12.2000, notice dated 11.1,2001 and the order dated 24.8.2001 passed by the District Magistrate, Allahabad....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sita Devi Sharma Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-23-2002
Service
Constitution of India - Article 311; Uttar Pradesh Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Services Rules, 1975 - Rule 3; Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations - Regulation 541, 541(1) and 541(2)
2002(4)AWC2857; [2002(94)FLR1219]; (2002)3UPLBEC2554
Sanjay Goswami, S.C.
Sudhir Narain, J. 1. The petitioner seeks to quash the impugned order dated 1.1.1979 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition) passed by the Superintendent of Police, Shahjahanpur, respondent No. 2, terminating her services.2. The version of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. N.K. Gupta
Delhi
Jul-02-2008
Civil
Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 40 - Schedule - Article 35; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 147 and 147(2); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105
151(2008)DLT505; 2008(105)DRJ218
Sanjay Goswamy and ; Ajay Kumar, Advs. and ; Iram Majid
S. Muralidhar, J.1. These appeals are directed against the common judgment dated 13th March, 2007 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 8161 of 2005 and Batch. The writ...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSandvik Asia Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vardhman Promoters Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi
Aug-21-2006
Contract
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 249UL(3); Transfer of Property Act; Evidence Act - Sections 91 and 92
2006(2)CTLJ305(Del); 2007(94)DRJ762
Sanjay Goswami, Adv.
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Suit seeks recovery of Rs. 21,00,000 (Rupees Twenty one lacs only) which the plaintiff paid to the defendant under an agreement to sell dated 19.11.1998 entered into between the parties. As per the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaghunath Ramnath Zolekar and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Aurangabad
Feb-04-2013
Criminal
Oral Judgment: (A.H. Joshi, J.) 5th November, 2012. 1. We have heard all these appeals at length. Perused the record. All appeals are being decided by this common judgment. 2. First Information Report was registered, taking...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShanti Devi and ors. Vs. District Deputy Director, Consolidation/Colle ...
Allahabad
Feb-21-2003
Property
Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 48(3)
2003(2)AWC868
Sanjay Goswami, Adv. and ;S.C.
S.N. Srivastava, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Sanjay Goswami, learned standing counsel representing the State authorities. Since controversy involved in this petition lies in a narrow compass, both the counsel agreed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShakti Stone Works Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Feb-01-2000
Property
Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Order, 1963 - Rule 70
2000(2)AWC878
Sanjay Goswami, ;S.C. ;and O.P. Singh, Adv.
D. S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Sri Raj Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri Sanjay Goswami, the learnedstanding counsel of the State of U. P.. representing the respondents.2. The principal prayer of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSom Dutt Builders Limited Through Its Authorised Attorney, Shri B.K. B ...
Allahabad
Feb-02-2005
Civil
Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 33, 33(1), 33(4), 33(5) and 40; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 to 128 and 145 to 148
AIR2005All234; 2005(2)AWC1711; 2005(3)ESC1939
Lal Ji Sinha and ;Sanjay Goswami, Advs. and ;C.S.C.
Vineet Saran, J.1. A Nazul plot No. 10, Block 15, Civil Lines, Kanpur measuring 6910 Sq. meters had been put to auction by the Kanpur Development Authority on 28.4.1987. The bid of the petitioner for Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »