Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: sanjay goswami · Page 1 of about 73 results (0.030 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 15 2004

Satendra Mani Tiwari Vs. Commissioner, Gorakhpur Division and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-15-2004

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 27(4)

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2668

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Goswami, Adv., ;D.K. Yadav, Adv. and ;S.W. Ali, S.C.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri N.C. Rajvanshi senior advocate, assisted by Sri J.B. Mishra, on behalf of the petitioner, standing counsel on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Sri Sanjay Goswami, Advocate on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2000

Aniruddha Kumar and Ashwini Kumar Vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Author ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-19-2000

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 27, 33, 47A and 47A(1); Stamp Rules, 1899 - Rules 340 to 350; Urban Area Zamindari Abolition Act - Sections 64; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari and Land Reforms Act - Sections 143

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2587

Advocate for Respondent : S.C., Sanjay Goswami, Adv.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner had purchased 500 square meters of land out of plot No. 412/0/15-0 situated in Phulpur town area, Allahabad under registered sale deed on 1st May. 1992, setting forth Rs. 50.000 as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 2001

Smt. Shakira Khatoon Kazmi and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-07-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Government Grants Act, 1895 - Sections 2 and 3; Uttar Pradesh Government Grants (Amendment) Act, 1960

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC226

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Mehta, ;Sanjay Goswami and ;Shakeel Ahmad Almi, Advs.

G.P. Mathur, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed for quashing of the Government order dated 15.12.2000, notice dated 11.1,2001 and the order dated 24.8.2001 passed by the District Magistrate, Allahabad....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 23 2002

Sita Devi Sharma Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-23-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311; Uttar Pradesh Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Services Rules, 1975 - Rule 3; Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations - Regulation 541, 541(1) and 541(2)

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC2857; [2002(94)FLR1219]; (2002)3UPLBEC2554

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Goswami, S.C.

Sudhir Narain, J. 1. The petitioner seeks to quash the impugned order dated 1.1.1979 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition) passed by the Superintendent of Police, Shahjahanpur, respondent No. 2, terminating her services.2. The version of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2008

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. N.K. Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-02-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 40 - Schedule - Article 35; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 147 and 147(2); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105

Reported in : 151(2008)DLT505; 2008(105)DRJ218

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Goswamy and ; Ajay Kumar, Advs. and ; Iram Majid

S. Muralidhar, J.1. These appeals are directed against the common judgment dated 13th March, 2007 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 8161 of 2005 and Batch. The writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2006

Sandvik Asia Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vardhman Promoters Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-21-2006

Subject : Contract

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 249UL(3); Transfer of Property Act; Evidence Act - Sections 91 and 92

Reported in : 2006(2)CTLJ305(Del); 2007(94)DRJ762

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Goswami, Adv.

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Suit seeks recovery of Rs. 21,00,000 (Rupees Twenty one lacs only) which the plaintiff paid to the defendant under an agreement to sell dated 19.11.1998 entered into between the parties. As per the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2013

Raghunath Ramnath Zolekar and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Feb-04-2013

Subject : Criminal

Oral Judgment: (A.H. Joshi, J.) 5th November, 2012. 1. We have heard all these appeals at length. Perused the record. All appeals are being decided by this common judgment. 2. First Information Report was registered, taking...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2003

Shanti Devi and ors. Vs. District Deputy Director, Consolidation/Colle ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-21-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 48(3)

Reported in : 2003(2)AWC868

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Goswami, Adv. and ;S.C.

S.N. Srivastava, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Sanjay Goswami, learned standing counsel representing the State authorities. Since controversy involved in this petition lies in a narrow compass, both the counsel agreed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2000

Shakti Stone Works Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-01-2000

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Order, 1963 - Rule 70

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC878

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Goswami, ;S.C. ;and O.P. Singh, Adv.

D. S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Sri Raj Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri Sanjay Goswami, the learnedstanding counsel of the State of U. P.. representing the respondents.2. The principal prayer of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2005

Som Dutt Builders Limited Through Its Authorised Attorney, Shri B.K. B ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-02-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 33, 33(1), 33(4), 33(5) and 40; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 to 128 and 145 to 148

Reported in : AIR2005All234; 2005(2)AWC1711; 2005(3)ESC1939

Advocate for Respondent : Lal Ji Sinha and ;Sanjay Goswami, Advs. and ;C.S.C.

Vineet Saran, J.1. A Nazul plot No. 10, Block 15, Civil Lines, Kanpur measuring 6910 Sq. meters had been put to auction by the Kanpur Development Authority on 28.4.1987. The bid of the petitioner for Rs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial