Advanced Search Results

M. Gopalakrishna Vs. Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protect ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 - Sections 9, 10, 17 and 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 304, 304A and 498A; Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rules 104.3, 146, 146(4), 146.2, 146.3, 146.4, 147, 148, 149, 153, 153.5, 155 and 156; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 232; Railway Protection Force Rules, 1957 - Rule 143; Rajasthan Service Rules - Rules 30A and 86(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 136, 226 and 311

Reported in : 2006(5)ALD704; 2006(5)ALT408

Advocate for Respondent : G.S. Sanghi, Adv.

ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. Questioning the proceedings of the 1st respondent dated 20.01.1995, imposing on the petitioner the punishment of removal from service, as confirmed in proceedings dated 16.04.1996 of the 2nd respondent and further confirmed in...

Md. Abdul Samad Vs. General Manager, South Central Railway and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Servants (Pension) Rules, 1963 - Rules 13(1), 44 and 65; Manual of Railway Pension Rules, 1950; Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993 - Rule 65 and 65(1); Disciplinary and Appeal Rules; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(3)ALD722; 2007(4)ALT90; 2008(2)SLJ102(NULL)

Advocate for Respondent : Gouri Shankar Sanghi, Sr. S.C.

ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. Aggrieved by the order of the 3rd respondent dated 28-6-2000, whereby the petitioner's request for sanction of compassionate allowance was rejected, the present writ petition is filed.2. The petitioner was appointed as a...

Mithilesh Kumar Vs. Manohar Lal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Registration Act - Sections 17(1), 49 and 50; Stamp Act - Sections 2(10) and 2(14)

Reported in : 1996(8)SCALE444; (1997)9SCC54; [1996]Supp8SCR173; 1997(1)LC317(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : G.L. Sanghi, ; K.B. Rohtagi and ; Aparna Rohtagi, Advs.

ORDER1. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the learned single Judge of the Allahabad High Court made on 26.10.1979 in Civil Appeal No. 68/71.2. The appellant filed the suit for perpetual injunction...

G.S. Brahmaji Rao Vs. Deputy Chief Electrical Engineer, Workshop, Lalg ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes Issue of Community, Nativity and Date of Birth Certificates Rules 1997 - Rule 7; Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes Issue of Community, Nativity and Date of Birth Certificates Act, 1993 - Sections 20(1) and 21;

Reported in : 2008(5)ALT298

Advocate for Respondent : G.S. Sanghi, S.C.

ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J. 1. This writ petition is filed against the order dated 24-02-1999 passed in O.A. No. 1104 of 1997 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad.2. The applicant in the O.A. is...

K. Dakshina Murthy Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Service Pension Rules, 1993 - Rules 15 and 87(4)

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD557

Advocate for Respondent : G.S. Sanghi, SC for Railways for respondent Nos. 2 and 3

S.R. Nayak, J. 1. This writ petition preferred against the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 28.8.1997 in O.A. No.277 of 1997. O.A. No.277 of 1997 was filed by the petitioner herein praying for a...

Life Insurance Corporation of India and Another Vs. Gangadhar Vishwana ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 222, 226(3), 244 and 281

Reported in : (1989)80CTR(SC)213; [1989]180ITR1(SC); [1989]Supp1SCR97

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Sanghi, Adv.

ORDERJ.S. Verma, J.1. This appeal by special leave is against the judgment dated January 7, 1981 in Writ Petition No. 1248 of 1977 of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. The special leave has...

Commercial Tax Officer and ors. Vs. Swastik Roadways and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionCommercial

Acts : Constitution of India; Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 2, 5, 6, 9, 27, 28, 29, 57, 57(1), 57(2), 57(1)(2), 58, 58(1) and 59; Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Rules - Rules 57 and 75; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act - Sections 78, 78(2) and 78(5); Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 42, 42(1), 42(2) and 42(3); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4(1); Tripura Sales Tax Act; ;Haryana General Sales Tax Act - Sections 38, 38(1), 38(2) and 38(3)

Reported in : JT2004(2)SC396; 2004(2)SCALE453; (2004)3SCC640; [2004]135STC1(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Sanghi, Adv.

S.H. Kapadia, J.1. These two civil appeals raise an important question of constitutional significance centering around Entry 54 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India as also the extent and purport...

Punjab Dairy Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Other ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 25(2) and 125 and 125(2)

Reported in : 1987(12)ECC135; ILR1987Delhi93

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanghi

ORDERB.N. Kirpal, J.1. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution the Challenge is to the action of the respondents in not releasing the goods which had been imported and also to the levy...

Mis. Punjab Diary Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25(2)

Reported in : 1987(30)ELT241(Del); 1987RLR319

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanghi

B.N. Kirpal, J.(1) In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution the challenge is to the action of the respondents in not releasing the goods which had been imported and also to the levy...

Punjab Dairy Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1988(14)LC193(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanghi

B.N. Kirpal, J.1. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution the challenge is to the action of the respondents in not releasing the goods which had been imported and also to the levy...