Advanced Search Results
M. Gopalakrishna Vs. Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protect ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-07-2006
Service
Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 - Sections 9, 10, 17 and 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 304, 304A and 498A; Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rules 104.3, 146, 146(4), 146.2, 146.3, 146.4, 147, 148, 149, 153, 153.5, 155 and 156; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 232; Railway Protection Force Rules, 1957 - Rule 143; Rajasthan Service Rules - Rules 30A and 86(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 136, 226 and 311
2006(5)ALD704; 2006(5)ALT408
G.S. Sanghi, Adv.
ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. Questioning the proceedings of the 1st respondent dated 20.01.1995, imposing on the petitioner the punishment of removal from service, as confirmed in proceedings dated 16.04.1996 of the 2nd respondent and further confirmed in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMd. Abdul Samad Vs. General Manager, South Central Railway and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-15-2006
Service
Railway Servants (Pension) Rules, 1963 - Rules 13(1), 44 and 65; Manual of Railway Pension Rules, 1950; Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993 - Rule 65 and 65(1); Disciplinary and Appeal Rules; Constitution of India - Article 226
2007(3)ALD722; 2007(4)ALT90; 2008(2)SLJ102(NULL)
Gouri Shankar Sanghi, Sr. S.C.
ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. Aggrieved by the order of the 3rd respondent dated 28-6-2000, whereby the petitioner's request for sanction of compassionate allowance was rejected, the present writ petition is filed.2. The petitioner was appointed as a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMithilesh Kumar Vs. Manohar Lal
Supreme Court of India
Oct-30-1996
Property
Registration Act - Sections 17(1), 49 and 50; Stamp Act - Sections 2(10) and 2(14)
1996(8)SCALE444; (1997)9SCC54; [1996]Supp8SCR173; 1997(1)LC317(SC)
G.L. Sanghi, ; K.B. Rohtagi and ; Aparna Rohtagi, Advs.
ORDER1. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the learned single Judge of the Allahabad High Court made on 26.10.1979 in Civil Appeal No. 68/71.2. The appellant filed the suit for perpetual injunction...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
G.S. Brahmaji Rao Vs. Deputy Chief Electrical Engineer, Workshop, Lalg ...
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-22-2008
Civil
Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes Issue of Community, Nativity and Date of Birth Certificates Rules 1997 - Rule 7; Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes Issue of Community, Nativity and Date of Birth Certificates Act, 1993 - Sections 20(1) and 21;
2008(5)ALT298
G.S. Sanghi, S.C.
ORDERGhulam Mohammed, J. 1. This writ petition is filed against the order dated 24-02-1999 passed in O.A. No. 1104 of 1997 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad.2. The applicant in the O.A. is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Dakshina Murthy Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-02-2002
Service
Railway Service Pension Rules, 1993 - Rules 15 and 87(4)
2003(1)ALD557
G.S. Sanghi, SC for Railways for respondent Nos. 2 and 3
S.R. Nayak, J. 1. This writ petition preferred against the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 28.8.1997 in O.A. No.277 of 1997. O.A. No.277 of 1997 was filed by the petitioner herein praying for a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovindram (through L.R's.) Vs. Ramgopal and Ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-24-1984
Family
Hindu Law; Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 11
AIR1984MP136; 1985MPLJ20
N.K. Sanghi, Adv.
G.G. Sohani, J.1. This is defendants' second appeal arising out of a suit for redemption - instituted by the plaintiff-respondent. The plaintiff's case, in brief, was that Dhnnraj s/o Hceralal and Bhanwarlal s/o Keshrilal, who were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLife Insurance Corporation of India and Another Vs. Gangadhar Vishwana ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-08-1989
Insurance
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 222, 226(3), 244 and 281
(1989)80CTR(SC)213; [1989]180ITR1(SC); [1989]Supp1SCR97
A.K. Sanghi, Adv.
ORDERJ.S. Verma, J.1. This appeal by special leave is against the judgment dated January 7, 1981 in Writ Petition No. 1248 of 1977 of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. The special leave has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommercial Tax Officer and ors. Vs. Swastik Roadways and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-13-2004
ConstitutionCommercial
Constitution of India; Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 2, 5, 6, 9, 27, 28, 29, 57, 57(1), 57(2), 57(1)(2), 58, 58(1) and 59; Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Rules - Rules 57 and 75; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act - Sections 78, 78(2) and 78(5); Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 42, 42(1), 42(2) and 42(3); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4(1); Tripura Sales Tax Act; ;Haryana General Sales Tax Act - Sections 38, 38(1), 38(2) and 38(3)
JT2004(2)SC396; 2004(2)SCALE453; (2004)3SCC640; [2004]135STC1(SC)
A.K. Sanghi, Adv.
S.H. Kapadia, J.1. These two civil appeals raise an important question of constitutional significance centering around Entry 54 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India as also the extent and purport...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSyed Azad Vs. Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protection For ...
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-14-2005
Service
Railway Protection Force Rules - Rule 137; Railway Services (Conduct) Rules, 1966 - Rule 21(1)
2006(1)ALD501; 2006(2)ALT112
Gouri Shankar Sanghi, SC
ORDERB. Prakash Rao, J.1. Heard Sri J.M. Naidu, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Gown Sankar Sanghi, learned standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. The petitioner, who has been working as R.P.F....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWaheedunnisa Begum (Died) Per Lrs. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Hydera ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-19-2006
Property
Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 452; Evidence Act - Sections 79 and 83
2007(2)ALD564; 2007(4)ALT689
Pratap Narayan Sanghi, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in SA No. 644 of 1994 and for Respondent Nos. 3 to 6 in SA No. 646 of 1994 and J. Prabhakar, Adv. for Respondent No. 8 in SA No. 646 of 1994
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. These second appeals are filed by the same appellant and against, almost the same parties. Hence, they are disposed of through a common judgment. For the sake of convenience, the parties are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »