Advanced Search Results

Chetan Malhotra and Others Vs. Lala Ram and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

These sixteen appeals give rise to common questions of law concerning the method of calculation of compensation in accident claim cases involving deaths of children in motor vehicular accidents and hence have been taken up for...

New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Hajra and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral: By judgment dated 06.02.2014, the motor accident claims tribunal (tribunal) decided accident claim case (MACT.No. 431/2012) instituted by the first and second respondents (claimants) on 04.12.2012 seeking compensation under Sections 166 and 140 of Motor...

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Devi and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Zile Singh suffered death at the age of 45 years due to injuries sustained in a motor vehicular accident that occurred at 10.50 PM on 19.10.2009 when the cycle cart taken out on public road...

Mahadeva Vs. Karnataka Electricity Board

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 - Sections 310

Reported in : ILR1987KAR3720

Advocate for Respondent : N.K. Gupta, Adv. for R-1 and 2, ;R. Gururanjan, Adv. for R-3, ;R.C. Castelino, Adv. for R-5, ;H.B. Datar, Senior Adv. and ;H. N. Narayan for R-5

ORDERRama Jois, J.1. This public interest Petition is presented on the allegation that the 5th respondent was attempting to occupy the additional floors of a commercial complex called 'Sangeeta' which are directed to be demolished by...

Mosomat Ful Sunder Ojha with Manoj Kumar Ojha Vs. State and anr.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438

Advocate for Respondent : Ramesh Dutta, Adv. for Opposite Party No. 1 and Sanjeev Kr. Verma, Adv. for Opposite Party No. 2

P.K. Sinha, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. This petition is being disposed of along with Cr. Misc. No. 5305 of 2002 and this order will govern both the cases.3. In this instant case, mother-in-law...

Ramesh Kumar Radheshyam Agrawal and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304B and 498A

Reported in : 1999(1)MPLJ423

Advocate for Respondent : P.C. Jain, Panel Lawyer

V.K. Agrawal, J.1. By impugned judgment dated 14-8-1997 in Sessions Trial No. 83/97, the Additional Sessions Judge, Jashpurnagar, Distt. Raigarh, has convicted each of the accused/appellants for offences punishable under Sections 498A and 304B of Indian...

Gajaji Gopalji Jadeja Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Home Guards Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 4 and 8; Bombay Home Guards Rules, 1953 - Rule 3, 4, 6 and 16; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 21, 32, 38, 39, 39A(2), 41, 42, 43, 46, 48A and 226; Home Guards Act; West Bengal Home Guards Act; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : (2005)2GLR1142

Advocate for Respondent : Kamal Trivedi, Ld. Additional Adv. General and; Sangeeta Vishen, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1-2 and;

K.M. Mehta, J.1. The petitioners - 610 in number, formally appointed by the Gujarat State under the Bombay Home Guards Act, 1947 and the Bombay Home Guards Rules, 1953, but really forming a special wing, known...

Gopinathji Dev Mandir Trust Thro. Chairman and anr. Vs. State of Gujar ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 - Sections 65, 65(2), 146, 146(1), 148, 258 and 264; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950; Gram Panchayats Act; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 79; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 28, 227 and 298

Reported in : (2008)3GLR2215

Advocate for Respondent : Kamal B. Trivedi, learned Adv. General, Sangeeta Vishen, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2,

Abhilasha Kumari, J.1. Rule. Ms. Sangeeta Vishen, learned Assistant Government Pleader, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents Nos. 1 and 2, Mr. Harin P. Raval, learned advocate, waives service of notice...

Chitra M. Prakashker and 35 ors. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Service

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961; Gujarat Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1971 - Rule 15; Gujarat Civil Services (General Conditions of Services) Rules, 2002 - Rule 34; Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002; Gujarat Civil Services (Revision of Pay) Rules, 1987; Gujarat Civil Services (Revision of Pay) Rules, 1998; Employees' State Insurance Scheme Recruitment Rules, 1983 - Rule 8; Medical Officers (Gujarat Medical Service) Class-II Recruitment Rules, 1977 - Rule 7; The District Family Planning Medical Officers' Recruitment Rules, 1967 - Rule 8; The Gujarat Insurance Medical Officers - Class-II (Alopathy) Employees' State Insurance Scheme Recruitment Rules, 1981 - Rule 8; Constitution of India - Articles 14,

Reported in : 2008GLH(1)527; (2008)2GLR1031

Advocate for Respondent : Kamal Trivedi, Adv. General and; Sangeeta Vishen, AGP for Respondent No. 1

Jayant Patel, J.1. All in-service doctors, whose services are governed by various statutory Rules framed by the Government in exercise of the power under Article 309 of the Constitution, including that of Gujarat Civil Services (Conduct)...

Valjibhai Jagjivanbhai Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 5, 5(1), 5(2), 5(3), 6, 6(1), 6(2), 7, 8, 8AA, 8AA(1), 9, 9(1), 9(2), 9(3), 31, 35, 46, 48, 71A and 240; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulations) Act, 1976; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1976 - Sections 63 and 84C; Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 6 and 8 - Schedule - Articles 59, 60, 65 and 113; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 11; Land Acquisition Act; Orissa Estate Abolition Act, 1951; Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1959 - Rule 4

Reported in : (2005)3GLR1852

Advocate for Respondent : K.B. Trivedi, Addl. Adv. General and; Sangeeta K. Vishen, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1-2 and 4-3/2,;

Akshay H. Mehta, J.1. These two petitions have been placed before us in view of the order passed by the learned Single Judge [Coram : M R Shah, J.] dated 11th August, 2004. By said order...