Advanced Search Results

Muknaram and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1990(2)WLN575

Y.R. Meena, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the judgment of Sessions Judge, Balotra dated 27-11-81 whereby the learned Sessions Judge has sustained the conviction of accused petitioners Under Section 4/9 of the Opium Act...

Smt. Ramjot Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Customs

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1), 3(3) and 8; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 22(5)

Reported in : 1990(50)ELT349(Raj)

Advocate for Respondent : J.P. Joshi, Addl. Adv. General

K.S. Lodha, J.1. This writ petition in the nature of Habeas Corpus has been filed by Smt. Ramjot, challenging the detention of her son Shri Ghanshyam under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention. of Smuggling...

Bajrang Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304B; Evidence Act - Sections 113B; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 209 and 482

Reported in : 2003CriLJ1127; RLW2003(3)Raj1979; 2003(1)WLC462

Advocate for Respondent : Sandeep Mehta, Adv.

Joshi, J.1. The instant criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed against the order dated 5.8.1997 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Merta in Criminal revision No. 23/97(14/95)...

State of Rajasthan Vs. Mst. Bhuri and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 313 and 378; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304, 323 and 325

Reported in : 1997CriLJ708

Advocate for Respondent : Sandeep Mehta, Adv.

Gopal Lal Gupta, J.1. This appeal under Section 378, Cr.P.C. has been directed against the acquittal recorded by the learned Sessions Judge, Merta vide judgment dated 12-4-1978.2. The prosecution case relates to an incident which occurred...

Mohd. Nasir and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Narcotics

Reported in : 1995(3)WLC217; 1995(1)WLN519

Rajendra Saxena, J.1. These revision petitions have been directed against the order dated 26.6.93 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, (Sessions Judgej Sriganganagar in aforementioned Special Case 'Stale v. Hardayat Singh & Others', whereby...

Devi Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1988WLN(UC)388

J.R. Chopra, J.1. This is a jail appeal against the judgment of learned District and Sessions Judge, Pratapgarh dated 2-4 1987 whereby the learned trial court has held accused appellant Devi Lal guilty of the offence...

Jai Prakash versus State of Uttarakhand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : [2025]8S.C.R.243

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Saakshi Singh Rawat, Ms. Rachna Gandhi

[2025] 8 S.C.R. 243 : 2025 INSC 861 Jai Prakash v. State of Uttarakhand (Criminal Appeal No(s). 331-332 of 2022) 16 July 2025 [Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol* and Sandeep Mehta JJ.] Issue for Consideration Allegation against...

In Re : T.n. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

2024 INSC178REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION I.A. NO.20650 OF2023IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.202 OF1995IN RE: T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD …PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. …RESPONDENT(S) IN RE: GAURAV KUMAR BANSAL...

Tusharbhai Rajnikantbhai Shah Vs. State Of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

REPORTABLE2024INSC588IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT/CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION(CIVIL) NO(S). OF2024(D. No.1106 OF2024 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(CRL.) NO(S). 14489 OF2023TUSHARBHAI RAJNIKANTBHAI SHAH …..PETITIONER(S) VERSUS KAMAL DAYANI & ORS. …RESPONDENT(S)/ ALLEGED CONTEMNOR(S) WITH SPECIAL LEAVE...

Smt. Satki Devi and anr. Etc. Vs. Tikam Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2006CriLJ4721; RLW2007(2)Raj1620

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Vineet Jain

S.N. Jha, C.J.1. A short but significant question of law regarding interpretation of Sub-rule (5) of Rule 4 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules 1995 is involved in these two appeals....