Advanced Search Results

Rameshwar Lal and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1984WLN(UC)399

Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar dated January 19, 1979 by which appellant Rameshwar Lal was convicted for the effences under Sections 302 IPC...

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Surinder Mohan and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200, 306, 307 and 465; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120-B, 302, 380 and 457

Reported in : 2000CriLJ1429; JT2000(1)SC593; RLW2000(2)SC253; 2000(1)SCALE450; (2000)2SCC396; [2000]1SCR659; 2000(1)LC478(SC)

M.B. Shah, J.1. Leave granted.2. The respondents were tried for offences punishable under Sections 302, 380, 457, 120-B read with Section 34 IPC by the Additional Sessions Judge (I), Kangara at Dharamshala in Sessions case No....

Shyam Dhar Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(1)AWC984

Devi Prasad Singh, J.1. Heard Sri R.S. Pandey, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jai Shanker Mishra, learned standing counsel.2. Affidavits have been exchanged and with the consent of parties counsel I proceed to...

Abdul Hakim and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1861 - Sections 34, 323 and 324

Advocate for Respondent : Sandeep Kumar, Adv. for O.P. No. 2

Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J.1. Petitioners were put on trial for the offence under Section 341/34, 323/34, 379/34 and 324/34 of the Indian Penal Code, hereinafter referred to as the IPC. The Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sadar,...

Asha Ram Vs. Rai Singh Etc.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10

Reported in : (1998)118PLR835

Advocate for Respondent : O.P. Goyal, Sr. Adv.,; Sandeep Kumar, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 14 and 27;;

G.C. Garg, J.1. Plaintiff-respondents filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction tinder Order 1 Rule 10 of the Civil -Procedure Code against Rai Singh and others on August 26,1986. Parties to the suit concluded their...

Suneel Kapoor and ors. Vs. Viiith A.D.J. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1) and 22

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2419

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Mishra, Adv. and ;Komal Mehrotra, S.C.

Mukteshwar Prasad, J.1. This writ petition has been filed' by the landlords whose release application filed under Section 21 (1) (a) of U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') was...

Sunita Rani Vs. Ramesh Chander

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (2008)152PLR143

Permod Kohli, J.1. Invoking revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 15(5)of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), landlady has filed this Revision challenging the findings recorded by...

Ram Autar Agrawal Vs. A.D.J., (Special) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : TenancyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226 and 227; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 13(1), 13(2) and 21(1)

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC419; 2005(1)AWC833

Advocate for Respondent : S.C.

Anjani Kumar, J.1. By means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-landlord challenges the orders dated 25th April, 1989, passed by the prescribed authority and 14th February, 1990, passed...

Sandeep Kumar Garg Vs. Sandeep Kumar Aggarwal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 - Sections 138

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)972; IV(2005)BC217; (2005)140PLR486

Advocate for Respondent : Party in Person

M.M. Aggarwal, J.1. In this case, the petitioner-accused had made an application for discharge in complaint for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. That application was dismissed by the Judicial Magistrate, Panchkula...

Hangrama Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1995(1)WLC691; 1994(2)WLN206

Rajendra Saxena, J.1. This jail appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 31.3.1992 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dungarpur, whereby he convicted the appellant for the offences Under Sections 302 & 450 I.P.C. and...