Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: sampatraj and · Page 1 of about 46 results (0.058 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 04 1976

Chogmal Bhandari and ors. Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Ii Divisi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-04-1976

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1976)5CTR(SC)271

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ram Reddy

Fazal Ali, J. - This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, dated December 2, 1974 and arises under the following circumstances.2. Itikala Kollayya and his brother-in-law Kovvuru...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2013

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Th:cbi Mumbai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Satyakam

APPEALS RELATING TO DEATH SENTENCE PART-1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1728 of 2007 Yakub Abdul Razak Memon .... Appellant(s) vs. The State of Maharashtra, through CBI , Bombay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2013

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi , B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 19, 3(3), 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 5, 6; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212, 120B; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 7, 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a); Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Satyakam

 P. Sathasivam, J.1) This appeal and the connected matters have been directed against thefinal orders and judgments of conviction and sentence passed on variousdates by the Presiding Officer of the Designated Court under Terrorist andDisruptive Activities...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 10 1963

Narpat Raj Vs. Babulal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-10-1963

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 32, Rules 1, 2 and 7

Reported in : AIR1964Raj92

Advocate for Respondent : Magraj Bhansali, Adv.

Modi, J.1. This is an appeal by the decree-holder Narpat Raj in an execution matter and arises under the following circumstances.2. The appellant along with two others obtained a decree against the respondents Babulal and others...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1992

NavIn Parekh Vs. Madhubala Shridhar Sharma and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-29-1992

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1992)94BOMLR467

M.F. Saldanha, J.1. This is a criminal writ petition filed by a practising advocate whereby he has assailed the validity of an order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 23rd Court, Esplanade, Bombay, in Criminal Case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1950

Pokar and ors. Vs. Lakshman and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-01-1950

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Rajasthan (Protection of Tenants) Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 3, 4 and 5; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108

Reported in : AIR1951Raj120

Advocate for Respondent : Dhanpat Raj, Adv.

ORDERBapna, J.1. This is a revn against the order of the learned Munsif No. 1 of Sojat. The facts of the case, as can be gathered from the plaint, are as under:2. There is a well...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1999

Vardhaman Polymer Indus. and ors. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-18-1999

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2000)(88)LC801Tri(Mum.)bai

1. M/s. Vardhman Polymer Industries were a small scale manufacturer making plastic moulded parts for domestic mixer. They were not licensed under the Central Excise law nor had they filed any declaration claiming the benefit of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1976

Chogmal Bhandari and ors. Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Ii Divisi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-04-1976

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53

Reported in : AIR1976SC656; (1976)3SCC749; [1976]3SCR325; [1977]40STC207(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : P. Ram Reddy and ; P.P. Rao, Advs.

S.M. Fazal Ali, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dated December 2, 1974, and arises under the following circumstances :Itikala Kollayya and his brother-in-law Kovvuru...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 1982

Shesh Mal and ors. Vs. Harak Chand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-15-1982

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53A and 54; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 49; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96

Reported in : AIR1983Raj109

Advocate for Respondent : H.C. Jain, Adv.

Dwarka Prasad, J.1. This second appeal arises out of a suit for possession, which has been dismissed by both the courts below.2. It is no longer in dispute that the house property, which is subject matter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1977

The Board of Muslim Wakfs for Rajasthan Vs. Bhanwar Chand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-25-1977

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Reported in : 1977WLN(UC)38

M.L. Shrimal, J.1. This special appeal by the Board of Muslim Wakfs for Rajasthan, Jaipur under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance No. 15 of 1949 (hereinafter to be referred as the Ordinance') is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial