Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: sampathkumar · Page 1 of about 226 results (0.099 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 11 1984

Kasi and ors. Vs. Govt. of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-11-1984

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Slum Areas (Imporvement and Clearance) Act, 1971 - Sections 3 and 11

Reported in : AIR1985Mad169

Advocate for Respondent : Govt. Pleader and ;M.S. Sampathkumar, Adv.

Gokulakrishnan, J. 1. The appellants herein filed the writ petition, out of which the present writ appeal arises, for the issue of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1997

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. K. Vivekananthan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-05-1997

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 27(1) and 35; Wealth Tax Rules - Rule 1

Reported in : [1999]235ITR300(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : P.B. Sampathkumar, Adv.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. A common question of law has been referred by the Tribunal, for our opinion, under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), for the assessment years 1973-74...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 1984

Kasi and ors. Vs. Govt. of Tamil Nadu Reptd. by Secretary, Labour Depa ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-11-1984

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1984)2MLJ205

P.R. Gokulakrishnan, J.1. The appellants herein filed the writ petition, out of which the present writ appeal arises, for the issue of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 14 2003

First International Line S.A. Vs. Chokhani International Ltd., D.B. Ma ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-14-2003

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(1), 11 and 11(4) and 11(9)

Reported in : 2003(3)ARBLR225(Madras); (2003)3MLJ48

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Raman for R2 and ;S. Sampathkumar Senior Counsel for ;Sampathkumar & Associate for R1

V.S. Sirpurkar, J. 1. The present writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge of this Court, dismissing the writ petition filed on behalf of the appellant herein, who had challenged therein...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2012

A.B.Sathish Kumar Vs. Mr.Ramaiah, I.A.S

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-12-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.E.Sampathkumar, Adv.

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.6853 of 2003 on 26.02.2010.O R D E R1....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2001

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, United India Building 4th Floo ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-12-2001

Subject : InsuranceContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28 and 78; Indian Contract (Amendment) Act, 1997; Limitation Act, 1965 - Schedule - Sections 4; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 10; Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 110

Reported in : AIR2001Mad489

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. Sampathkumar, Adv. ;for M/s Sampathkumar

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J. 1. First defendant in O.S.No.20 of 1987 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore has filed the above appeal. The plaintiff/respondent herein filed the said suit against the first defendant and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2005

G. Kailasam and anr. Vs. Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corpn. Ltd. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-04-2005

Subject : Commercial

Acts : State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29 to 32; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 128; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2005Mad297; (2005)2MLJ218

Advocate for Respondent : Sarnpath Kumar, Sr. Counsel for Sampathkumar and Associates (for Nos. 1 and 2) and ;S. Jaganathan, Adv. (for No. 3)

P. Sathasivam, J.1. The above Writ Appeal has been filed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 25-11 -2004, made in Writ Petition No. 30013 of 2003 in and by which the learned Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 1990

K. Bhagavatheeswaran Vs. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India a ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-21-1990

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Income-tax Act - Sections 44AB

Reported in : [1990]68CompCas1(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : S. Sampathkumar, Adv.

1. After hearing both Mr. C. Harikrishnan for the petitioner and Mr. S. Sampathkumar for the first respondent, I find that there is a prima facie case made out for grant of injunction. In W. P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2001

K. Jagannathan Vs. A.M. Vasudevan Chettiar and 12 Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-25-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 6, 8, 11 and 12; GW Act - Sections 19; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 1; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 31; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 44; Court-Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR2001Mad184; (2001)1MLJ614

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. G. Subramaniam, ;Senior Counsel for Mr. D. Rajagopal and ;Mr. S. Sampathkumar, Advs.

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. Plaintiff in O.S.No.20 of 1983 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Pattukottai is the appellant in the above appeal. He filed the said suit for partition and separate possession of his 1/9th share....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 1998

K. Bhagavatheeswaran Vs. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India a ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-13-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19; Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 - Sections 22; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 44AB; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : [1998]93CompCas625(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : S. Sampathkumar, Adv. for respondent No. 1 and; None appeared for respondent No. 2

Y. Venkatachalam, J.1. Since the parties to both these writs and also the point involved herein are common, both these writ petitions were taken up together and are disposed of by this common order with the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial