Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: sameer sharma and · Page 1 of about 152 results (0.041 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 11 2004

Hari Har Narayan Lal Vs. Presiding Officer (PeethasIn Adhikari), Labou ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-11-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 4K and 10

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC3460; [2004(102)FLR797]

Advocate for Respondent : Sameer Sharma, S.C.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Ashok Bhatnagar on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Sameer Sharma on behalf of the respondent Corporation as well as standing counsel on behalf of the respondent No. 1.2. This writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2004

Bachau Ram Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-28-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2807

Advocate for Respondent : Sameer Sharma, S.C.

Vineet Saran, J.1. The petitioner was appointed in the year 1959 as a Bus Conductor on temporary basis with the U. P. Government Roadways (now U. P. State Road Transport Corporation). On 15,4.1987, while the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 2004

Lakhan Lal Uttam Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-01-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC247; (2005)1UPLBEC445

Advocate for Respondent : Sameer Sharma, Adv. and ;S.C.

Vineet Saran, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Sameer Sharma, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting respondents and have perused the record.2. The petitioner claims that he was engaged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 02 2007

Sachida Nand Pathak Son of Sri Surya NaraIn Pathak Vs. Regional Manage ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-02-2007

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008(2)AWC1792; [2007(115)FLR203]

Vineet Saran, J.1. The petitioner was appointed as a Conductor in the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation sometimes in the year 1979. On certain charges of carrying passengers without ticket the petitioner was placed under suspension...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2006

Vinit Panchori Son of Late Sri Bhagwan Swaroop Panchori Vs. State of U ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-24-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974

Reported in : [2006(109)FLR1099]

Advocate for Respondent : Sameer Sharma, Adv. and ;S.C.

Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. The case has been taken up in the revised list. Heard Sri Sameer Sharma, learned Counsel for the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, and the learned Standing Counsel.2. The petitioner has prayed for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2002

Mohd. Yaqub Vs. U.P. State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-21-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 4(1)

Reported in : II(2003)ACC504; 2004ACJ1237; [2003(97)FLR224]

Advocate for Respondent : Sameer Sharma, Adv.

B.K. Rathi, J.1. Appellant was a driver of U.P. State Road Transport Corporation. He met with an accident on 16.12.1978 and received injuries. Due to the injuries, his one leg was amputated. Therefore, he claimed compensation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1999

Phool Singh Vs. Managing Director, U.P.S.R.T.C. Lucknow and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-30-1999

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2629; (1999)3UPLBEC1912

Advocate for Respondent : Sameer Sharma and ;Sunil Sharma, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel forthe petitioner and Mr. Sameer Sharma. learned counsel for the respondents.2. The petitioner was subjected to disciplinary proceedings, in which he was found guilty. In the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2003

Naresh Chandra Gupta Vs. U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and ors ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-05-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Employees (other than officers) Service Regulations, 1981 - Regulations 67(1) and 69

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC1931b

Advocate for Respondent : Sameer Sharma, ;M.N. Verma and ;V.K. Singh, Advs. and ;S.C.

S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, praying for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2002

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-23-2002

Subject : Motor VehiclesConstitution

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 68C, 68D and 68F; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 100(3), 100(4) and 217(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 226

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC2756

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Singh, ;L.P. Naithani, ;Ravi Kant, ;G.K. Malviya, ;H.P. Dubey, ;S.N. Jaiswal, ;A.R. Dubey, ;C.P. Ghildayal, ;Swapnil Kumar and ;A.D. Saund, Advs.

S.R. Singh, J.1. Impugned in Writ No. 9332 of 2002 is the validity and legality of the order dated 3.11.2001 passed by the Hearing Authority and in the other writ petition, the validity of the scheme...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2003

Ram Chandra Pathak Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-05-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Employees (Other than Officers) Service Regulations, 1981 - Regulation 39; Uttar Pradesh Government Roadways Organisation (Abolition of Posts and Absorption of Employees) Rules, 1982

Reported in : 2003(2)AWC1348

Advocate for Respondent : Sameer Sharma, Adv. and ;S.C.

Sunil Ambwani, J. 1. By theaforesaid batch of writ petitions, the employees of U. P. State Road Transport Corporation, retired from non-pensionable post, have once again approached this Court with prayers directing respondents to award pension...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial