Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: sadanand · Page 1 of about 752 results (0.108 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 30 2008

The State of Bihar and ors. Vs. Sardar Guru Dayal Singh and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jan-30-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bihar State Minorities Commission Act, 1991 - Sections 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5(1), 6 and 17; Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : G.P. Singh, Sr. Adv. and B.K. Dubey, Adv

Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J.1. In exercise of the power conferred under Section 4(1) of the Bihar State Minorities Commission Act, 1991, hereinafter referred to as the Act, the State Government vide notification dated 18th of August,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 1987

Param Hans Yadav and Sadanand Tripathi Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-25-1987

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1987SC955; 1987(35)BLJR486; 1987CriLJ789; 1987(1)Crimes894(SC); JT1987(1)SC595; 1987(1)SCALE426; (1987)2SCC197; [1987]2SCR405

Advocate for Respondent : Jaya Narayan and ; D. Goburdhan, ; Advs.

Ranganath Misra, J.1. These appeals by special leave are directed against a common judgment of the Patna High Court rendered in Death Reference 3 of 1984 and Criminal Appeal No. 627, 647 and 676 of 1984....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1976

Workmen of Madras Flying Club Ltd. Vs. Additional Labour Court and anr ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-20-1976

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1976)IILLJ428Mad

Mohan, J.1. An interesting question, which defies exactness, viz., as to the definition of 'industry' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, arises for consideration in this writ petition. The short facts are as follows:2. By G.O.R....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 09 1986

Yeshwantrao Martandrao Mukane Since Deceased Through His Legal Represe ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-09-1986

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53(A); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14 and 41; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 36, 37 and 38;

Reported in : 1986(1)BomCR533

Advocate for Respondent : M.G. Kikla, Adv.

B.A. Masodkar, J.1. This appeal by original defendant No. 1 (since deceased and represented by his heirs) and original defendant No. 2 questions the decree made for permanent injunction restraining them from disturbing the possession of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2003

Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-25-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR634(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Sahani, Adv.

Tapen Sen, J. 1.Heard Dr. S.N. Jha learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. A.K. Sahani for the respondent No. 2. 2. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for quashing the Award dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1976

The Workmen Employed in Madras Flying Club Limited represented by the ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-20-1976

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1977)1MLJ99

S. Mohan, J.1. An interesting question, which defies exactness, viz., as to the definition of 'industry' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, arises for consideration in this writ petition. The short facts are as follows:2. By...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2006

National Textile Corporation (Maharashtra North) Limited and the Gener ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-31-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 24(B); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 33C(2) 25FF, 25O and 50; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1947 - Sections 3(8A) 78 and 79; ;Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 7

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR77; 2006(6)MhLj487

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Patel, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;B.B. Dholakia, Adv. for respondent Nos. 5 to 8

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. By this petition filed on December 5, 2005, the petitioners seek to challenge two orders passed by the Industrial Court at Bombay on March 30, 1998 and March 11, 2005 in a complaint...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 1992

Ramaswamy Vs. the Tahsildar Saidapet Taluk, Madras and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-20-1992

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Sections 6 and 7; Constitution of India - Article 226; Tamil Nadu Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 - Sections 8 and 25

Reported in : AIR1992Mad367

Advocate for Respondent : M.A. Sadanand, Govt. Pleader and ;T.K. Ramkumar, Adv.

ORDERNainar Sundaram, C.J.1. The petitioner in W.P. Mp/ 665 of 1991 is the appellant in this writ appeal. The respondents in the writ petition are the respondents in this Writ Appeal. For the sake of convenience,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 2005

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Madhusudan Pathak and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-28-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Cinematography Act, 1952 - Sections 6, 6(1), 93(1), 93(3) and 60; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Central Civil Services (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules, 1964 - Rules 3(1) and 11

Advocate for Respondent : Ajoy Kumar Tripathi, Additional Central Government Standing Counsel in CWJC No. 6334/2004, Sadanand Jha, Sr. Adv. and Sunil Kumar Upadhyay, Adv. in CWJC No. 5681/2004

Navin Sinha, J.1. The above mentioned two writ applications arise out of singular proceedings before the Central Administrative Tribunal Patna Bench and have therefore been heard together and are being disposed by this common order. CWJC...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 1994

Elmeh India Vs. Hi-sound Corder Private Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-07-1994

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434(1)

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas135(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : M.A. Sadanand and ;G.S. Sivakumar, Adv.

Jayasimha Babu, J.1. This is a petition for winding up the respondent-company on the ground that it is unable to pay its debts. 2. The case of the petitioner is that it had given a sum...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial