Advanced Search Results

State of Maharashtra Vs. Shankar Shivaji Phalake

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 323 and 504; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 294

Reported in : 2005(3)MhLj374

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Kotwal, Adv. holding for ;M.S. Mohite, Adv.

Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The State of Maharashtra has preferred this appeal against the impugned order of acquittal dated 7th July, 1994, passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, whereby, accused respondent was acquitted of...

Vasudeo Karunakar Nambiar Vs. Mr. Balkrishna Karunakar Nambiar and Oth ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302 and 307

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR298

Advocate for Respondent : S.R. Shinde, A.P.P., ;S.V. Kotwal for ;S.R. Chitnis, Adv.

ORDERDr. Pratibha Upasani, J.1. This criminal writ petition is filed, by the petitioner original complainant, being aggrieved by the order dated 31st March, 1992, passed by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, granting bail to the...

Shri. Mangesh Nivrutti Kashid and Others Vs. the District Collector, S ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

N.M. Jamdar, J. 1. These petitions arise from the proceedings undertaken for validation of Caste Certificates. The two points that we have framed for our consideration are common in all these petitions and thus, these petitions...

Sampat Dagdu Sandhbour and Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Oral Judgment: 1. Both these appeals can be conveniently disposed of by this common order as both the appellants were convicted in the same trial that was held by the Sessions Judge for Raigad, at Alibaug....

Smt. Zebunnisa Abdul Majid Vs. Shri M.N. Singh, Commissioner of Police ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 384, 387, 504 and 506; Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1); Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985

Reported in : (2001)3BOMLR41; 2001CriLJ2759; 2001(3)MhLj365

Advocate for Respondent : Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, A.P.P. and ;Miss A.R. Kamath, A.P.P.

Smt. Ranjana Desai, J.1. This petition is filed by the mother of one Abdul Rafiq alias Rafiq Lala Majid Shaikh ('the detenu') who has been detained under the provisions of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities...

Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

A.S. Gadkari, J. 1. The present Appeals have been filed by the Appellants, who are as per the final report submitted by the police before the Special Court under the MCOC Act, Pune, accused Nos.3 and...

Shashikant Piraji Sonawane Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The appellant and one Smruti Achrekar were prosecuted on the allegation that they had committed offences punishable under section 7 and section 13(1)2) read with 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The...

Shivaji Raghunath Dhadam Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

A.S. Gadkari, J. 1. The appellant, original accused no.1, has challenged the judgment and order dated 29th August 1992 passed in Sessions Case No.188 of 1991 by the Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Satara...

Shivaji Raghunath Dhadam Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

A.S. Gadkari, J. 1. The appellant, original accused no.1, has challenged the judgment and order dated 29th August 1992 passed in Sessions Case No.188 of 1991 by the Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Satara...

Gorakh Pandurang Mare Age 20 Yrs, and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 324, 325, 326, 392, 393, 394, 397;

Advocate for Respondent : Smt. V.R.Bhosale,Adv.

1. Both these Appeals may be disposed of by common Judgment as the accused persons have challenged the same Judgment and order whereby the accused Nos. 1, 2 and 4 were convicted for the offence punishable...