Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s v doijode · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.016 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 13 2006

Tata Power Company Limited Vs. Reliance Energy Limited

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Dec-13-2006

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL1080

1. This appeal was heard by the Hon'ble 1^st Bench of this Appellate Tribunal, consisting of the Hon'ble Chairperson and the Hon'ble Technical Member (Hon'ble Mr. A.A. Khan). The Hon'ble Technical Member by his Judgment dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2003

Star India Private Limited Vs. Laxmiraj Seetharam Nayak and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-10-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Contract Act - Sections 27

Reported in : 2003(3)BomCR563; 2003(3)MhLj726

Advocate for Respondent : Kapil Sibal, ;Atul Sharma, ;S.V. Doijode, ;Akhil Sibal, ;P.A. Kabadi and ;Minakshi Iyer, Advs., i/b., ;Doijode Patharphekar and Associates for defendant No. 1, ;I.M. Chagla, ;Atul Sharma, ;S.V. Doijod

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. The plaintiff is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 presently known as Star India Private Limited. It carries on a business of acquiring copyrights in cinematographic films, television serials, programmes etc....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 01 1970

Cds Financial Services (Mauritius) Limited, a Body Corporate Incorpora ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-01-1970

Subject : CivilCompany

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 10, 81, 111A, 155, 293(1), 397, 398 and 408; Company (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 11B and 17

Reported in : [2004]121CompCas374(Bom); [2004]56SCL665(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : P. Chidambaram, ;R.M. Kadam, ;S.V. Doijode, ;Parag Kabadi, ;Veerendra V. Tulzapurkar, ;S.V. Doijode, ;Parag Kabadi, ;Virag V. Tulzapurkar, ;S.V. Doijode and ; Parag Kabadi, Advs., i/b.,

Shah, J.1. The appellant is the originalplaintiff in the suit. The plaintiff isaggrieved by the impugned order passed by thelearned single Judge declining to grant to theplaintiff an ad-interim order of injunctionrestraining defendant nos.1 to 8...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 05 2004

Air India Ltd. Vs. Caribjet Inc.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-05-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 159 to 163

Reported in : [2004]271ITR370(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Virag Tulzapurkar, ;S.V. Doijode and ;P. Kabadi, Advs. i/b., Doijode Phatarphekar and Associates in support of the Chamber Summons

A.M. Khanwilkar J.1. By this chamber summons, the defendant prays that leave granted by this court under clause 12 of the Letters Patent, in favour of the plaintiff, by order dated September 8, 2001, to institute...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 2006

Gopal L. Raheja and anr. Vs. Vijay B. Raheja and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-15-2006

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act - Sections 15; Constitution of India - Article 215

Reported in : 2007(1)ALLMR138; 2006(6)BomCR845

Advocate for Respondent : N.H. Seervai, Sr. Adv., i/b., J. Sagar Associates for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, ;I.M. Chagla, Sr. Adv., ;Levy Pareira, ;S.V. Doijode and ;Minakshi Iyer, Advs., i/b., Doijode Associates for Respondent

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. We have been hearing the above Appeal. On 20th April, 2006, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 to 4 sought to tender an affidavit of one Mrs. Tara Subramanyam, Senior...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 2000

i.C.i.C.i. Ltd. Vs. Veena Textiles Limited and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-28-2000

Subject : Company

Acts : Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 3, 17, 18 and 31

Reported in : [2003]115CompCas269(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Doijode, Adv. i/b., ;Shah Desai and Doijode

R.K. Batta, J.1. The plaintiffs seek judge's order for directions to the court receiver, Bombay High Court to pay them all the amounts of ad hoc royalty deposited and/or to be deposited by defendant No. 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2007

Gopal L. Raheja of Mumbai, Indian Inhabitant and Vs. Vijay B. Raheja o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-25-2007

Subject : Company

Acts : Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(3) and 7; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 82, 88 and 94; Specific Relief Act; Transfer of Property Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 2

Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR288

Advocate for Respondent : N.H. Seervai, Adv., i/b., J. Sagar and Associates for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, ;I.M. Chagla, Sr. Adv. and ;L.C. Pereira, ;S.V. Doijode and ;Meenakshi Iyer, Advs., i/b., Doijode Associates for Responde

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. This appeal arises out of an order passed by a Learned Single Judge on 14th March 2005 while disposing of a Motion for interim relief in the suit. The Plaintiffs are in appeal....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 1998

M/S. Premlaxmi and Co. Vs. Trafalgar House Construction India Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-04-1998

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(1), 7(5) and 11; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940

Reported in : 1998(4)ALLMR412; 1998(4)BomCR830; (1998)3BOMLR708; 1998(3)MhLj695

Advocate for Respondent : N.H. Seervai, ;S.V. Doijode and ;P.A. Kabadi, Advs., i/by M/s. Shah Desai Doijode & Phatarphekar

ORDERM.B. Shah, C.J.1. This application is filed by the applicant M/s. Premlaxmi & Co. against the Respondent Trafalgar House Construction India Ltd. under section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, for the sake...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2008

Khojeste Mistree and ors. Vs. Bombay Parsi Punchayet and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-30-2008

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 22 and 47; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 260, 302 and 303; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 4; Trusts Act - Sections 1, 46 and 47 and 48; Constitution of India - Article 217(1)

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR786; 2008(4)BomCR617

Advocate for Respondent : I.M. Chagla,; D.J. Khambatta, Sr. Advs.,; Shyam Mehta,; S.V. Doijode,; P.A. Kabadi and; Falguni Thakkar, Advs., i/b.,; Doijode and Associate for respondent Nos. 1 to 7 and; P.G. Lad, A.G.P. for respon

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. By this Appeal, the appellants are challenging the order dated 8th February, 2007 passed by the learned Single Judge which was passed with regard to an Originating Summons seeking opinion/answers on the following...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2008

Khojeste Mistree and ors. Vs. Minoo Rustomji Shroff and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-30-2008

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 22 and 50A(3)

Reported in : 2008(5)MhLj783

Advocate for Respondent : I.M. Chagla, Sr. Counsel and ;D.J. Khambata, ;Shyam Mehta, ;S.V. Doijode, ;P.A. Kabadi and ;Falguni Thakkar, Advs., i/b., ;Doijode and Associate, ;P.G. Lad, AGP, ;P.D. Bhamgam, ;R.N. Sethana and ;Vedp

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. In all the above three Appeals, the Appellants are challenging the order dated 5th April, 2007 passed by the learned single Judge in Misc. Petition No. 17 of 2006. We have heard all...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial