Advanced Search Results
Tata Power Company Limited Vs. Reliance Energy Limited
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Dec-13-2006
Electricity
(2007)LCAPTEL1080
1. This appeal was heard by the Hon'ble 1^st Bench of this Appellate Tribunal, consisting of the Hon'ble Chairperson and the Hon'ble Technical Member (Hon'ble Mr. A.A. Khan). The Hon'ble Technical Member by his Judgment dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskStar India Private Limited Vs. Laxmiraj Seetharam Nayak and anr.
Mumbai
Jan-10-2003
Service
Contract Act - Sections 27
2003(3)BomCR563; 2003(3)MhLj726
Kapil Sibal, ;Atul Sharma, ;S.V. Doijode, ;Akhil Sibal, ;P.A. Kabadi and ;Minakshi Iyer, Advs., i/b., ;Doijode Patharphekar and Associates for defendant No. 1, ;I.M. Chagla, ;Atul Sharma, ;S.V. Doijod
ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. The plaintiff is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 presently known as Star India Private Limited. It carries on a business of acquiring copyrights in cinematographic films, television serials, programmes etc....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCds Financial Services (Mauritius) Limited, a Body Corporate Incorpora ...
Mumbai
Jan-01-1970
CivilCompany
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 10, 81, 111A, 155, 293(1), 397, 398 and 408; Company (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 11B and 17
[2004]121CompCas374(Bom); [2004]56SCL665(Bom)
P. Chidambaram, ;R.M. Kadam, ;S.V. Doijode, ;Parag Kabadi, ;Veerendra V. Tulzapurkar, ;S.V. Doijode, ;Parag Kabadi, ;Virag V. Tulzapurkar, ;S.V. Doijode and ; Parag Kabadi, Advs., i/b.,
Shah, J.1. The appellant is the originalplaintiff in the suit. The plaintiff isaggrieved by the impugned order passed by thelearned single Judge declining to grant to theplaintiff an ad-interim order of injunctionrestraining defendant nos.1 to 8...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Air India Ltd. Vs. Caribjet Inc.
Mumbai
Mar-05-2004
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 159 to 163
[2004]271ITR370(Bom)
Virag Tulzapurkar, ;S.V. Doijode and ;P. Kabadi, Advs. i/b., Doijode Phatarphekar and Associates in support of the Chamber Summons
A.M. Khanwilkar J.1. By this chamber summons, the defendant prays that leave granted by this court under clause 12 of the Letters Patent, in favour of the plaintiff, by order dated September 8, 2001, to institute...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGopal L. Raheja and anr. Vs. Vijay B. Raheja and ors.
Mumbai
Nov-15-2006
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act - Sections 15; Constitution of India - Article 215
2007(1)ALLMR138; 2006(6)BomCR845
N.H. Seervai, Sr. Adv., i/b., J. Sagar Associates for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, ;I.M. Chagla, Sr. Adv., ;Levy Pareira, ;S.V. Doijode and ;Minakshi Iyer, Advs., i/b., Doijode Associates for Respondent
S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. We have been hearing the above Appeal. On 20th April, 2006, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 to 4 sought to tender an affidavit of one Mrs. Tara Subramanyam, Senior...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Aski.C.i.C.i. Ltd. Vs. Veena Textiles Limited and ors.
Mumbai
Jun-28-2000
Company
Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 3, 17, 18 and 31
[2003]115CompCas269(Bom)
S.V. Doijode, Adv. i/b., ;Shah Desai and Doijode
R.K. Batta, J.1. The plaintiffs seek judge's order for directions to the court receiver, Bombay High Court to pay them all the amounts of ad hoc royalty deposited and/or to be deposited by defendant No. 1...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGopal L. Raheja of Mumbai, Indian Inhabitant and Vs. Vijay B. Raheja o ...
Mumbai
Apr-25-2007
Company
Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(3) and 7; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 82, 88 and 94; Specific Relief Act; Transfer of Property Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 2
2007(4)BomCR288
N.H. Seervai, Adv., i/b., J. Sagar and Associates for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, ;I.M. Chagla, Sr. Adv. and ;L.C. Pereira, ;S.V. Doijode and ;Meenakshi Iyer, Advs., i/b., Doijode Associates for Responde
D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. This appeal arises out of an order passed by a Learned Single Judge on 14th March 2005 while disposing of a Motion for interim relief in the suit. The Plaintiffs are in appeal....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Premlaxmi and Co. Vs. Trafalgar House Construction India Ltd.
Mumbai
Sep-04-1998
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(1), 7(5) and 11; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940
1998(4)ALLMR412; 1998(4)BomCR830; (1998)3BOMLR708; 1998(3)MhLj695
N.H. Seervai, ;S.V. Doijode and ;P.A. Kabadi, Advs., i/by M/s. Shah Desai Doijode & Phatarphekar
ORDERM.B. Shah, C.J.1. This application is filed by the applicant M/s. Premlaxmi & Co. against the Respondent Trafalgar House Construction India Ltd. under section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, for the sake...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhojeste Mistree and ors. Vs. Bombay Parsi Punchayet and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-30-2008
Trusts and Societies
Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 22 and 47; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 260, 302 and 303; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 4; Trusts Act - Sections 1, 46 and 47 and 48; Constitution of India - Article 217(1)
2008(5)ALLMR786; 2008(4)BomCR617
I.M. Chagla,; D.J. Khambatta, Sr. Advs.,; Shyam Mehta,; S.V. Doijode,; P.A. Kabadi and; Falguni Thakkar, Advs., i/b.,; Doijode and Associate for respondent Nos. 1 to 7 and; P.G. Lad, A.G.P. for respon
S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. By this Appeal, the appellants are challenging the order dated 8th February, 2007 passed by the learned Single Judge which was passed with regard to an Originating Summons seeking opinion/answers on the following...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhojeste Mistree and ors. Vs. Minoo Rustomji Shroff and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-30-2008
Trusts and Societies
Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 22 and 50A(3)
2008(5)MhLj783
I.M. Chagla, Sr. Counsel and ;D.J. Khambata, ;Shyam Mehta, ;S.V. Doijode, ;P.A. Kabadi and ;Falguni Thakkar, Advs., i/b., ;Doijode and Associate, ;P.G. Lad, AGP, ;P.D. Bhamgam, ;R.N. Sethana and ;Vedp
S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. In all the above three Appeals, the Appellants are challenging the order dated 5th April, 2007 passed by the learned single Judge in Misc. Petition No. 17 of 2006. We have heard all...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »