Advanced Search Results

Castrol India Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35 and 35F

Reported in : 2007[5]STR246

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Bharucha, Adv.

ORDER1. Heard Mr. Patil in support of this petition Mrs. Bharucha appears for the respondents.2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties taken up for final hearing.3. The petitioner had furnished a bank...

Nova Pack Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 13, 23, 23(1), 27, 47 and 60; Contract Act - Sections 160 and 161; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 142, 226 and 300A; Supreme Court Rules, 1966 - Order 47, Rule 6

Reported in : 2006(199)ELT394(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Bharucha and ;S.I. Shah, Advs.

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.1. By this Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India the petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus ordering and directing respondent no. 3 to forthwith release and deliver to the petitioner two...

M/S Banka (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 11, 12 and 28(1)

Reported in : AIR1996Bom139; 1996(3)BomCR191; (1996)98BOMLR334

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. S.V. Bharucha and ;Smt. S. Bhattacharya, Advs.

ORDER1. Arbitration Petition No. 161 of 1995 has been filed by M/s. Banka (India) Ltd. for enlargement time to enable the 2nd Respondent therein to make his award. Arbitration Petition bearing Lodging No. 246 of 1995...

M/S. Grace Engineers Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 11, 12 and 20;

Reported in : AIR2000Bom158; 2000(1)ALLMR1; 2000(2)BomCR478; (2000)1BOMLR958; 2000(3)MhLj344

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Bharucha, Adv.

ORDERD.K. Deshmukh, J.1. This is a petition filed under section 11 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for removal of the Arbitrators as also under section 12 of the Act for appointment of a Sole Arbitrator. The...

i.P.C.A. Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 2006(199)ELT409(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : A.J. Rana, Sr. Adv. and ;S.V. Bharucha, Adv.

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. In the above petitions, the Petitioners are challenging the common adjudicating order passed by the Commissioner of Customs dated 8th July, 1998 with regard to two Bills of Entries dated 23-9-1994 and 23-12-1994....

Red Bull (India) Pvt. Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Companies ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Food Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 10(4), 20, 20A to 21 and 22A; Companies Act, 1956; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 451, 452 and 457; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 37A and 37A(2); Prevention of Food Adulteration (Amendment) Rules; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR152

Advocate for Respondent : D.A. Nalavade, Adv. and ;S.V. Bharucha, Adv. for Respondent No. 7

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.1. By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner has applied for the following reliefs:a. For a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order of direction under...

Caprihans India Ltd. Vs. Tarun Seem, Dy. Cit

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]132TAXMAN123(Bom)

S.H. Kapadia, J.Rule. Respondents waive service.2. By consent, writ petition is taken up for final hearing.3. Heard learned counsel on both sides. In this case, arguments were heard by us on 24-7-2003. After hearing the arguments,...

Mrs. Usha A. Kalwani Vs. S.N. Soni

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2004]136TAXMAN708(Bom)

V.C. Daga, J.This petition is directed against the order dated 3-11-1992 (Exhibit E) passed under section 273A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The facts leading to the present petition...

Cit Vs. Shapoorji Pallonji and Co. (P) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]132TAXMAN788(Bom)

S.H. Kapadia, J. At the instance of the department, the following two questions have been referred to us for our opinion under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act concerning assessment year 1972-73.2. For the sake...

Twinstar Holdings Ltd. Vs. Anand Kedia

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]125TAXMAN656(Bom)

S.H. Kapadia, J.By this writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks to challenge, inter alia, Notices dated 14-7-2002, 15-7-2002 and 15-7-2002 being Exhibit-J. 1 to Exhibit-J. 3 issued under section 226(5) read...