Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s sreeramulu · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.030 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 11 1992

Corn Products Company, Bombay Vs. Food Inspector, Tirunelveli Municipa ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-11-1992

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1993CriLJ1106

Advocate for Respondent : G.K. Gunavalan, Govt. Adv.

Janarthanam, J. 1. On 25-6-1989 to 10 a.m., the Food Inspector attached to Ilanji Town Panchayat, inspected 0.2123 Crescent Co-operative Stores situate at Amman Kovil Street, Ilanji Town whose head office is situate at Kadayanallur and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 1979

Hasimathunnisa Begum Vs. Vithal Rao Gangaji and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-29-1979

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 35(2)

Reported in : AIR1979AP273

Advocate for Respondent : S. Sreeramulu, Adv.

ORDER1. This revision petition is directed by the legal representative of the first defendant against the order of the IInd Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in E. P. No. 79/71 appointing a Commissioner who recommended...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 13 2005

P. Koteswaramma Vs. Star Electrical Industries and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-13-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 120

Reported in : 2005(6)ALD278

Advocate for Respondent : S. Sreeramulu, Adv. for Respondent No. 2, ;T.V.S. Prabhakara Rao, Adv. for Respondent No. 3 and ;M.V. Bharathi, Adv. for Respondent No. 5

P.S. Narayana, J.1. P. Koteswaramma, the unsuccessful plaintiff in O.S. No. 594 of 1984 on the file of the III Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, aggrieved by the judgment and decree made in the said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 06 1977

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors. Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-1977

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 19(1), 21, 22, 32, 73(1), 74(2), 142(1), 123, 153, 154, 155, 156, 163, 168, 169, 172, 172(1), 174(1), 174(2), 213, 248, 250, 256, 257, 257(1), 291, 352, 352(3), 353, 354, 356, 356(1), 356(3), 356(5), 365, 367 and 368; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 72, 93, 204 and 204(2); Internal Security (Amendment) Act, 1976; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 3(58) and 3(60); Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 14(2) and 30

Reported in : AIR1977SC1361; (1977)3SCC592; [1978]1SCR1

M.H. Beg, C.J.1. Original Suits Nos. 1 to 6 of 1977, before us have been filed on behalf of the States of Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Punjab, Bihar, Himachal Pradesh and Orissa against the India under Article...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2004

State of A.P. Vs. S. Janardhana Rao

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-17-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13(1) and 13(2)

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD(Cri)444; (2005)2CALLT50(SC); JT2005(1)SC33; 2004(9)SCALE532; (2005)1SCC360

Advocate for Respondent : D. Rama Krishna Reddy, ; G. Venugopal and ; Madhu Moolchanda

B.N. Agarwal, J.1. Initially four persons, namely, S.Janardhana Rao (A-1), Mohammed Omar Bin Moin (A-2), S. Indira (A-3) and S.Prasanth (A-4) were made accused, but as A-2 turned to be an approver, pardon was granted to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2005

Mohd. Siddiq Ali Vs. High Court of A.P. Through Registrar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-24-2005

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : States Reorganization Act, 1956; ;Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rule 22, 22A and 22(A)(2); Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service Rules - Rule 10; Constitution of India - Articles 15(1), 15(3), 16(2), 16(4) and 32

Reported in : AIR2005SC4380; [2006(108)FLR58]; JT2005(9)SC285; 2005(8)SCALE580; (2005)13SCC207

Advocate for Respondent : H. Sridhar, ; K. Ram Kumar and ; T.V. Ratnam, Advs.

G.P. Mathur, J.1. The issue raised in the Civil Appeals and Writ Petitions which have been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution is same and, therefore, they are being disposed of by a common order.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2012

Kamatchi and Another Vs. Muthammal and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-19-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(6)CTC833; 2012(5)LW958; 2013(1)MWN(Civil)4

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition against to call for the records pending on the file of the District Munsif, Rasipuram in R.E.P.No.5 of 2008 in O.S.No.110 of 1981 which was transferred from Sub Court, Namakkal dated 18.8.2009.)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial