Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s shivaram · Page 1 of about 152 results (0.857 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 05 2014

P. Rajalakshmi and Others Vs. M. Lakshmesh and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-05-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: R.F.A.No.902/2008 is filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 CPC against the judgment and decree dated 31.03.2008 passed in O.S.No.5634/1980 on the file of the XII Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore, partly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 1993

B.K. Kanavi Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-25-1993

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1993(3)KarLJ326

ORDERG.P. Shivaprakash, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is presented by the petitioner who belonged to the Karnataka Judicial Service. Disciplinary inquiry was instituted against him in Departmental Enquiry Case No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 1991

Tumkur Town Veerashaiva Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. H.C. Shyamala

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-29-1991

Subject : Company

Acts : Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 70; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 176

Reported in : [1994]81CompCas19b(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : S. Shivaram, Adv.

Mohan, C.J. 1. The first respondent borrowed a sum of Rs. 1,45,000 from the appellant co-operative bank to enable her to purchase a motor vehicle. There was an agreement of hypothecation between the first respondent and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 09 1991

Ramanna Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-09-1991

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Karnataka (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 7 and 9; ;Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act

Reported in : ILR1991KAR1771; 1991(2)KarLJ169

Advocate for Respondent : S. Shivaram, Govt. Adv. for R-1 and ;B.H. Mahesh Babu, Adv. for ;C.R.V. Swamy, Adv. for R-4 and R-5

Mohan, C.J.1. This Writ Appeal is directed against the Judgment of our Learned Brother Judge Justice Swami, rendered in Writ Petition No. 15249 of 1987, dated 2nd of November, 1988.2. The facts leading to the Writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 1991

Dr. Sumyra Mekhri Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-25-1991

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Conduct of Entrance Test for Admission to Post-Graduate Degree and Diploma (Medical and Dental) Courses Rules, 1987 - Rules 3 and 4(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 15

Reported in : AIR1992Kant315

Advocate for Respondent : S. Shivaram, Govt. Advocate

ORDERM. Rama Jois, Acting C. J. 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner who is a citizen of India hailing from the State of Jammu and Kashmir and who has become a permanent resident of Bangalore...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 1977

The State of Karnataka and ors. Vs. M.G. Chowde Gowda and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-27-1977

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rules 23 and 25; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1977Kant96; ILR1977KAR629; 1977(1)KarLJ183

Advocate for Respondent : S. Shivaram, Adv. for ;S.G. Doddakalegowda, Adv. and ;K.N. Subba Reddy, Adv.

Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order of the learned single judge allowing Writ Petition No. 244 of 1974 and directing the State Government to dispose of the case with liberty to call...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 1994

Venkataswamy Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-20-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 398

Reported in : ILR1994KAR1559; 1995(4)KarLJ247

Advocate for Respondent : S. Shivaram, Govt. Adv. for R-1 and ;B.B. Mandappa, Adv. for R-2 and R-3

Mohan Kumar, J. 1. Issue Rule.2. When this Petition came up for hearing, both sides agreed that the Writ Petition itself can be disposed of.3. The facts of the case disclose a rather unfortunate situation the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 1987

Shivaswamia Vs. State Bank of Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-18-1987

Subject : Labour and IndustrialLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14 - Schedule - Article 14

Reported in : ILR1987KAR2297

Advocate for Respondent : S. Shivaram and ;G.V. Shantharaju, Advs.

Bopanna, J.This appeal by the plaintiff is directed against the judgment and decree dated 2-2-1976 passed by the Principal Civil Judge, Bangalore City, in O. S. No. 337 of 1972 dismissing his suit for certain reliefs...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1991

M.S. Moses Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-05-1991

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 - Sections 14, 23, 25, 28(2), 28(4), 30 and 47; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 61; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 30

Reported in : ILR1991KAR770; 1991(1)KarLJ299

Advocate for Respondent : S. Shivaram, Govt. Adv. for R-1 and ;K.V. Narayanappa, Adv. for R-2 and 3

Mohan, C.J.1. The facts leading to the Writ Appeal are as follows:On 1-11-1965 Notification under Section 4A(1) of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 was issued Including Hoodi Village where the land forming the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 1991

Nagarathnamma Vs. Special Deputy Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-07-1991

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 4(2)

Reported in : ILR1991KAR813

Advocate for Respondent : S. Shivaram, Govt. Adv. for R-1 and 2 and ;P. Vishwanatha Shetty, Adv. for R-3

Mohan, C.J.1. Here is a case of glaring example how an arm of a meaningful law can be twisted to disgorge the benefit earned after a hard fought battle.2. The appellant is the owner of premises...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial