Advanced Search Results

Jagdish and ors. Vs. Har Sarup

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 40 and 40(2); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1978Delhi233; 14(1978)DLT66; 1978RLR266

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Shukla, Adv.

1. Har Sarup, plaintiff, owns agricultural land in village Mandaoli Fazalpur. Adjoining land is owned by jagdish and others, defendants. The defendants, while excavating earth from their land, are alleged to have excavated earth from a...

Pocket B Mig Flats Welfare Association Vs. Dda and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA 160/2013 POCKET B MIG FLATS WELFARE ASSOCIATION ..... Appellant Through : Mr. S.N. Gupta, Mr. S.S. Shukla, Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj, and Mr. Gaurav Kakar,...

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Passports Act, 1967 - Sections 10(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 6, 7, 10, 10(3) and 11; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 3, 3(2), 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 10(1), 10(3), 10(5), 11, 11(5), 19, 22, 41, 43 and 99; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(5), 19(6), 21 and 32

Reported in : AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621; MANU/SC/0133/1978; (1978) 1 SCC 243

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Gupte, Attorney General, ; Soli J. Sarabjee, Additional Sol. Genl. Of Indian, ;

M.H. Beg, C.J.1. The case before us involves questions relating to basic human rights. On such questions I believe that multiplicity of views giving the approach of each member of this Court is not a disadvantage...

Devendra Kumar Arora Son of Mohan Lal and Smt. Sheela Devi Wife Mohan ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2437

Advocate for Respondent : Kapil Kumar Pandey, ;Ashutosh Srivastava, ;V.K. Srivastava, ;V. Singh, Advs. and ;S.C.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri S.S. Shukla, Advocate on behalf of the petitioners, Sri Ashutosh Mishra, Advocate on behalf of respondent No. 2 and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 3,...

Shri Subhash Chand Dass Vs. Shri Ram Gopal Aggarwal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 182/2013 SHRI SUBHASH CHAND DASS Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Puneet Verma, Advocate. versus SHRI RAM GOPAL AGGARWAL Through: ..... Respondent Mr.S.N.Gupta and Mr.S.S.Shukla, Advocates....

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Through : Divisional Manager ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

Subject : Education

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 18.10.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum"), in Complaint Case No.199/2012. By the impugned order, the learned...

Ram Kumar Gupta Vs. State and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:21.03.2013 FAO (OS) Nos.181/2012 & 182/2012 RAM KUMAR GUPTA Through:- ...Appellant Mr. S.N. Gupta and Mr. S.S. Shukla, Advs. Versus STATE &...

Deokinandan Parashar Vs. the Agra Distt. Co-operative Bank and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Rules, 1958 - Rules 22 and 101

Reported in : AIR1972SC2497; 1972LabIC1622; (1973)3SCC303

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Shukla and ; H.S. Marwaha, Advs.

D.G. Palekar, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment and Order dated October 25, 1967 passed by the Allahabad High Court in Civil Miscellaneous Writ No. 3713 of 1967.2. The petitioner Deoki...

Ahmedabad Mfg. and Calico Ptg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Ram Tahel Ramnand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 133, 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1972SC1598; 1972LabIC864; (1972)IILLJ165SC; (1972)1SCC898; [1973]1SCR185

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Shukla, Adv., ;for Respondent Nos. 1 to 9

I.D. Dua, J.-1. This appeal has been presented to this Court by the Ahmedabad ., pursuant to the certificate granted by the Gujarat High Court under Article 133(1)(c) of the Constitution. The Gujarat High Court had,...

Municipal Board, Sitapur Vs. Prayag NaraIn Saigal and

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 94, 131, 131(3), 132, 133 and 135, 135(2) and 135(3)

Reported in : AIR1970SC58; (1969)1SCC399; [1969]3SCR387

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Manchanda and ; S.S. Shukla, Advs.

Bachawat, J.1. These appeals are directed against orders of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), quashing the imposition of a water rate imposed by the Municipal Board, Sitapur. Section 126(1)(x) of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916...