Advanced Search Results
Rana Pratap Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
May-23-2003
Service
Disciplinary Authority Act
(2003)3UPLBEC2319
M.C. Chaturvedi, Addl. C.S.C., ;S.S. Sharma, S.C. and ;V.S. Misra, Adv.
R.B. Misra, J. 1. In this writ petition order dated 26.12.1995 (Annexure 9) has been challenged, whereby the petitioner has been removed from Service.2. Heard Sri S. K. Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner as well...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSant Kumar Upadhyay Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Apr-24-2003
Service
Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 - Rules 4, 10 and 13; Police Regulations, 1948 - Regulation 486(1), 486(5) and 486(6); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226
(2003)2UPLBEC1496
S.S. Sharma, Adv. and ;S.C.
R.B. Mishra, J.1. Heard Sri Shailendra, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.S. Sharma, learned Standing Counsel for the State.In this writ petition the prayer has been made to quash the order dated 21.5.1998 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Assam Vs. Banwarilal Pipalwa
Guwahati
Feb-14-1992
CriminalFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7, 13(2), 16 and 16(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Seciton 313
S.S. Sharma, N. Sarma and R.P. Sarma, Advs.
S.N. Phukan, J.1. By judgment and order dated 14-10-1988 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup at Guwahati in Case No. 1485 C of 1986 and the accused person was found not guilty Under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ashok Kumar Singh Vs. District Inspector of Schools and anr.
Allahabad
Jan-28-2004
ServiceConstitution
Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Commission (Removal of Difficulties Order) (Second), 1981; ;Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Commission and Selection Board Act, 1982 - Sections 9(4) and 18; Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Service Commission (First Amendment) Rules, 1992
2004(2)AWC1087
S.C. Dwivedi and ;Arvind Kumar Trivedi, Advs., ;M.C. Chaturvedi, Addl. C.S.C. and ;S.S. Sharma, S.C.
R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri V. K. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S. S. Sharma, learned standing counsel for the respondents.2. In this petition prayer has been made to quash the impugned order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJai Karan Singh Vs. Principal Sri Singheshwari Inter College and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-01-2003
Service
Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Regulations 35 and 36
2003(4)AWC3256
S.S. Sharma, Adv. and ;S.C.
R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri D.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.S. Sharma learned standing counsel for the State respondent.2. In this petition, the order dated 1.6.1990 dismissing the service of the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUmesh Chandra Baishya Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.
Guwahati
Feb-03-2004
Labour and Industrial
S.S. Sharma, Adv.
Ranjan Gogoi, J.1. Aggrieved by what the writ petitioner contends to be an unjustified and arbitrary action of the Respondents Insurance Company in denying promotion to the petitioner from the post of Development Officer Grade-I to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector, Dewan Manik Chand Court of Wards' Estate Vs. National Insur ...
Guwahati
Jan-03-1990
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
Mr. S.S. Sharma, Mr. R.L Yadav
S.N. Phukan, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs. The learned Asstt. District Judge, Kamrup dismissed this suit being M.S. No. 10/81 on the ground that civil Court has no jurisdiction.2. The plaintiff No. 1...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Mehta and Company Vs. Padgilwar Industries and ors.
Mumbai
Feb-22-2005
Civil
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 66, 68, 89, 90, 91 and 94
2005(3)ALLMR126; IV(2006)BC254; 2005(4)BomCR213
A.G. Gharote, Adv. for respondent No. 2, ;S.S. Sharma, Adv. for respondent No. 3 and ;Atul Pandey, Adv. for respondent No. 4
Rohee K.J., J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondents.2. Admit. Taken up for final hearing with consent of the parties. The learned Counsel for the respondents waive notice.3....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandra Bhan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Allahabad
Jan-06-2003
Service
Civil Services (C.C.A.) Rules, 1930 - Rule 55; Uttar Pradesh Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 - Rule 7
2003(1)AWC739; (2003)1UPLBEC749
S.S. Sharma, ;Raj Kumar, Advs. and ;S.C.
R.B. Mishra, J. 1. In this writ petition order dated 29.11.1997, passed by Sub-Divisional Officer/ Appointing and Punishing Authority, Garautha (Jhansi), has been challenged whereby the petitioner's service has been terminated on the ground that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArvind Kumar Maurya Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Allahabad
Feb-17-2003
Service
Uttar Pradesh Group 'D' Employees Service Rules, 1985 - Rules 19, 22 and 23; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation Draftsman Service Rules, 1980
2003(3)AWC1984
S.S. Sharma, Adv. and ;S.C.
R.B. Misra, J. 1. Heard Sri Sudhakar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri S. S. Sharma, learned standing counsel for the State.2. In this writ petition the petitioner has sought the direction,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »