Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s s sharma · Page 1 of about 240 results (0.440 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 23 2003

Rana Pratap Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-23-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Disciplinary Authority Act

Reported in : (2003)3UPLBEC2319

Advocate for Respondent : M.C. Chaturvedi, Addl. C.S.C., ;S.S. Sharma, S.C. and ;V.S. Misra, Adv.

R.B. Misra, J. 1. In this writ petition order dated 26.12.1995 (Annexure 9) has been challenged, whereby the petitioner has been removed from Service.2. Heard Sri S. K. Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner as well...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2003

Sant Kumar Upadhyay Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-24-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 - Rules 4, 10 and 13; Police Regulations, 1948 - Regulation 486(1), 486(5) and 486(6); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : (2003)2UPLBEC1496

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Sharma, Adv. and ;S.C.

R.B. Mishra, J.1. Heard Sri Shailendra, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.S. Sharma, learned Standing Counsel for the State.In this writ petition the prayer has been made to quash the order dated 21.5.1998 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 1992

State of Assam Vs. Banwarilal Pipalwa

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-14-1992

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7, 13(2), 16 and 16(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Seciton 313

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Sharma, N. Sarma and R.P. Sarma, Advs.

S.N. Phukan, J.1. By judgment and order dated 14-10-1988 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup at Guwahati in Case No. 1485 C of 1986 and the accused person was found not guilty Under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 28 2004

Ashok Kumar Singh Vs. District Inspector of Schools and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-28-2004

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Commission (Removal of Difficulties Order) (Second), 1981; ;Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Commission and Selection Board Act, 1982 - Sections 9(4) and 18; Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Service Commission (First Amendment) Rules, 1992

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1087

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Dwivedi and ;Arvind Kumar Trivedi, Advs., ;M.C. Chaturvedi, Addl. C.S.C. and ;S.S. Sharma, S.C.

R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri V. K. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S. S. Sharma, learned standing counsel for the respondents.2. In this petition prayer has been made to quash the impugned order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2003

Jai Karan Singh Vs. Principal Sri Singheshwari Inter College and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-01-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Regulations 35 and 36

Reported in : 2003(4)AWC3256

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Sharma, Adv. and ;S.C.

R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri D.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.S. Sharma learned standing counsel for the State respondent.2. In this petition, the order dated 1.6.1990 dismissing the service of the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2004

Umesh Chandra Baishya Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-03-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Sharma, Adv.

Ranjan Gogoi, J.1. Aggrieved by what the writ petitioner contends to be an unjustified and arbitrary action of the Respondents Insurance Company in denying promotion to the petitioner from the post of Development Officer Grade-I to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 1990

Collector, Dewan Manik Chand Court of Wards' Estate Vs. National Insur ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jan-03-1990

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S.S. Sharma, Mr. R.L Yadav

S.N. Phukan, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs. The learned Asstt. District Judge, Kamrup dismissed this suit being M.S. No. 10/81 on the ground that civil Court has no jurisdiction.2. The plaintiff No. 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2005

N. Mehta and Company Vs. Padgilwar Industries and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-22-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 66, 68, 89, 90, 91 and 94

Reported in : 2005(3)ALLMR126; IV(2006)BC254; 2005(4)BomCR213

Advocate for Respondent : A.G. Gharote, Adv. for respondent No. 2, ;S.S. Sharma, Adv. for respondent No. 3 and ;Atul Pandey, Adv. for respondent No. 4

Rohee K.J., J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondents.2. Admit. Taken up for final hearing with consent of the parties. The learned Counsel for the respondents waive notice.3....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2003

Chandra Bhan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-06-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Civil Services (C.C.A.) Rules, 1930 - Rule 55; Uttar Pradesh Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 - Rule 7

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC739; (2003)1UPLBEC749

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Sharma, ;Raj Kumar, Advs. and ;S.C.

R.B. Mishra, J. 1. In this writ petition order dated 29.11.1997, passed by Sub-Divisional Officer/ Appointing and Punishing Authority, Garautha (Jhansi), has been challenged whereby the petitioner's service has been terminated on the ground that the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2003

Arvind Kumar Maurya Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-17-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Group 'D' Employees Service Rules, 1985 - Rules 19, 22 and 23; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation Draftsman Service Rules, 1980

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC1984

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Sharma, Adv. and ;S.C.

R.B. Misra, J. 1. Heard Sri Sudhakar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri S. S. Sharma, learned standing counsel for the State.2. In this writ petition the petitioner has sought the direction,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial