Advanced Search Results
The State of U.P. Vs. Raj NaraIn and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-24-1975
Media and CommunicationCivil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123, 124 - 131 and 162
AIR1975SC865; (1975)4SCC428; [1975]3SCR333
Shanti Bhushan and ; J.P. Goyal, Advs. for Respondent no. 1, ; Yo
1. This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment dated 20 March, 1974 of the learned Single Judge of the High Court at Allahabad, holding that no privilege can be claimed by the Government...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. Vs. Laxmi Narain
Allahabad
Jul-08-1966
Criminal
Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 125(9) and 141; Uttar Pradesh Foodgrains (Control, Requisition and Distribution) Order, 1963; Uttar Pradesh Foodgrains Dealers Licensing Order, 1964
AIR1967All585; 1967CriLJ1593
S.S. Saxena
ORDERK.C. Puri, J.1. This is a Government appeal against the acquittal of Lashmi Narain by the Additional District Magistrate, Kheri. The respondent was prosecuted for an offence undersub-rule (9) of Rule 126 of the Defence of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaj NaraIn Vs. Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi and anr.
Allahabad
Mar-20-1974
CivilEvidence
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 162
AIR1974All324
S.C. Khare, ;J.N. Tiwari, ;S.N. Misra, ;V.N. Khare, ;S.K. Mukherji, ;P.C. Chaturvedi, ;K.L. Misra, ;A.P. Misra, ;Satya Mohan and ;N.N. Mukerji, Advs.
ORDERK.N. Srivastava, J.1. In this election petition privilege has been claimed regarding three sets of documents. Sri S. S. Saxena is alleged to have claimed privilege regarding four papers, including copy of a blue book with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bhaiyan and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Oct-14-1977
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 107 and 117; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 149 and 302; Constitution of India - Article 136
AIR1978SC36; 1978CriLJ155; (1978)1SCC149
I.N. Shroff, Adv.
Jaswant Singh, J.1. Bhaiyan and Dibia alias Devideen who were tried along with three others by the additional Sessions Judge, Chhatarpur, Madhya Pradesh, and found guilty by him of rioting under Section 147 of the Indian...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRampal Agarwal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Aug-29-1986
Trusts and SocietiesCivil
Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 - Sections 36 and 148; Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Rules, 1966 - Rule 38; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1987Raj198; 1986(2)WLN569
N.L. Jain, Adv. General and; G.G. Sharma, Adv.
ORDERM.B. Sharma, J.1. The petitioner - has challenged Annexure-5 an order of the State Government Department of Cooperative, dated June 12/13, 1985, under which in supersession of the order dated April 10,1985, by which the Board...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLajpat Rai Agarwal Vs. the Arya Samaj Shiksha Sabha
Rajasthan
Feb-01-1969
Constitution
1969WLN177
Jagat Narayan, J.1. This is plaintiff's revision application against an order of the Civil Judge, Ajmer, setting aside an award which was made in his favour. This order was confirmed on appeal by the learned District...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.T.P. Limited Vs. Second Labour Court and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-24-2002
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 9A, 18 and 33C(2); ;Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 7 and 8
(2002)IILLJ594Cal
Mr. Sarkar
D.K. Seth, J. Facts: 1. A Scheme was floated for Voluntary Retirement (VRS for short), which is annexure "II" to this writ petition at page 21. This scheme was floated on November 4, 1981. In the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFakira Vs. State
Allahabad
Sep-12-2012
Criminal
Sudhir Agarwal, J. 1. Fakira and his two sons Rajvir and Sheoraj were tried in Sessions Trial No. 214 of 1980 before Sri Y.C. Raizade, IV Additional Sessions Judge, Bulandshahr for the offences under Sections 307...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›