Advanced Search Results

Union of India Vs. T.L. Dakshinamurthy

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 311 and 811; Indian Railway Establishment Code - Rule 148(3)

Reported in : AIR1962Mad376; [1962(4)FLR110]; (1962)IILLJ96Mad; (1962)1MLJ373

(1) The respondent in this appeal was employed as a clerk in the southern railway. During the year 1950, he was required to do the duties of a store van clerk in a goods train. A...

V. Kanakaiya Chetty and Co. and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Rep ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72; Contract Act - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR1963Mad394

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Ramachandra Iyer and ;S.R. Kumaraswami, Advs.

S. Ramachandra Iyer, C.J.1. This is an appeal under Clause (15) of the Letters Patent against the judgment of Anantanarayanan, J. affirming the decree of the learned First Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras, dismissing a...

Kishanlal Roopchand and Co. Vs. Indian Dominion and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 77, 80 and 140

Reported in : AIR1955Mad151

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Ramachandra Iyer, Adv.

ORDERMack, J.1. The petitioner is the plaintiff-firm who sued the B. B. and C. I. Railway as the first defendant, and the M. & S. M. Railway as the second defendant, to recover Rs. 1541-4-0, being...

N. Vaithianathan Vs. the Union of India Represented by the General Man ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : AIR1951Mad658a; (1951)IMLJ84

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Ramachandra Iyer, Adv.

ORDERChandra Reddi, J.1. The petnr herein filed a petn in the Ct of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli, for permission to sue 'in forma pauperis' the deft, for damages in a sum of Rs. 14000, for wrongful...

A.M. Mariappa Mudaliar Vs. the Governor General-In Council Owning the ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72 and 151

Reported in : AIR1950Mad700; (1950)IIMLJ27

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Ramachandra Iyer, Adv.

Mack, J.1. The plaintiff, a piece goods merchant of Coimbatore with an office in Madras, sues the South Indian Railway for the recovery of Rs. 6981-10-0 as the value of three bales of sarees and cloths...

Nallaswami Gurukkal and ors. Vs. Sadasiva Gurukkal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1935Mad5a; 153Ind.Cas.464

Venkatasubba Rao, J.1. Mr. Varadachanar in his interesting argument has contended that Article 148, Lim. Act, does not apply, as the hereditary right of an archaka, to offer worship in a temple, is not in the...