Advanced Search Results

Bajaj Auto Limited Vs. Kalidas Devram Patil

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11-A

Reported in : 2000(1)ALLMR413; 2000(2)BomCR630; [2000(84)FLR157]; 1999(3)MhLj857

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Pawar, Adv.

ORDERB.H. Marlapalle, J.1. Heard Shri Ghuge, learned Counsel for the petitioner Company and Shri S.S. Pawar, learned Counsel for the respondent employee. Rule. Taken up for final hearing forthwith, by consent.2. The respondent employee came to...

Union of India and Ors vs Ex Maj Vivek Prakash

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~73, 74 & 76* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 18927/2025 Through: Mrs. Anubha Bhardwaj, CGSC, Ms. Anchal Kashyap, Ms. Ananya Shamshery, Ms. Riddhi Grover and Mr. Mayank Bawa, Advs., Major EX...

Smt. Naseem Imran Mohammed Siddik Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1976 - Sections 3(1), 7 and 7(1); Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 7(1)

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)502; 2001BomCR(Cri)310; (2001)2BOMLR822; 2001CriLJ1619

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. A.R. Kamath, A.P.P.

A. M. Khanwilkar, J. 1. By this petition, the Petitioner-wife of one Imran Mohammed Siddik @ Samad Abdul Kassam Chapra (hereinafter referred to as the detenu), has challenged the order passed by Shri G. S. Sandhu,...

State of Haryana Vs. Yad Ram

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7 and 16(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 320

Reported in : AIR1987P& H203

K.S. Tiwana, J.1. Yad Ram was tried by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate. Mohindergarh, and convicted for committing an offence under S. 7 read with S. 16(1)(a), Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, hereinafter referred to as the...

Vikrant @ Vikki and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra through Police ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Criminal

1. The appellant Nos.1 to 6 (original accused Nos.1 to 6, hereinafter referred accordingly) have filed this appeal against their conviction and sentences passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani in Sessions Trial No.74/2012 on 27.10.2015. The...

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Grasim Industries Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B and 35; Central Excise Rules - Rules 11B, 57 and 57A

Reported in : 1999LC227(MP); 2000(116)ELT28(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : J.P. Gupta and ;S.S. Pawar, Advs.

ORDERB.A. Khan, J.1. Respondent No. 1 is a public limited company engaged amongst other things in manufacture of caustic soda for which it uses titanium anodes as an input. It claimed Modvat credit for Excise duty...

Bedrock Ltd. (In the Matter of Scheme of Compromise/Arrangement Betwee ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 394 and 433; Companies Act, 1948 - Sections 206

Reported in : 1998(3)ALLMR729; 1998(4)BomCR710; (1998)2BOMLR5; [2000]101CompCas343(Bom)

ORDERS.S. Nijjar, J.1. The petitioner under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been filed for the sanction of a scheme of compromise/arrangement, hereinafter referred to as 'the 1996 agreement.' This compromise agreement...

Chandrabhan S/O Rama Dhengle Vs. Indarbai W/O Chandrabhan Dhengle and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22 and 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 323, 504 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 107, 109, 110, 116(3) and 151

Reported in : 1998(5)BomCR191; (1998)1BOMLR349; 1998(1)MhLj234

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Pawar, Adv. and ;S.K. Kadam, A.P.P.

ORDERA.D. Mane, J.1. This is a criminal writ petition under Article 226 read with Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India, arising out of following set of circumstances.2. The petitioner is citizen of India...

Anz Grindlays Bank Ltd. Vs. Grindlays Bank Employees Union and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948; Bombay Shops and Establishments Rules; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2000)IIILLJ629Bom

R.M. Lodha, J.1. The award passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Mumbai on June 30, 1997 adjudicating two references namely Reference No. CGIT-2/47 of 1993 and Reference No. CGIT-2/26 of 1995 is under...

Shashikant Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Criminal Revision No.856/2009 29.08.2013 Shri L.N.Singh, Sr.Advocate with Shri L. Mishra, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the Respondent-State. Heard the learned counsel for the parties finally. The applicants have moved the...