Advanced Search Results

New Chemi Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 9, 9(3) and 9(4)

Reported in : AIR1985Bom408

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Parkar and;S.G. Shah, Advs.

1. A matter which should not have seen light of the lay in a Court of law was even so compelled to be brought before it by way of this petition under Art. 226 of the...

Dilip Shankar Koli and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 1981CriLJ500

1. This is a second application for bail by original accused Nos. 1, 2, and 4 to 7 viz., Dilip Shankar Koli, Vishnu Haram Rajkumar, Bhaskar Krishna Uparkar, Hirakant Shankar Koli, Anthony Pascal Koli and Hareshwar...

M. Pushpanathen Marimuthu Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1978)80BOMLR142

Vaidya, J.1. The Deputy Registrar High Court, Appellate Side, has placed before us certain matters with his report, dated February 21, 1977, seeking directions regarding the practice to be followed on the returns in such matters.2....

Bhagwan Raoji Dale Vs. Sushma Alias Nanda Bhagwan Dale

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125, 127, 482 and 488; Indian Majority Act, 1875; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10(1) and 25; Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939; Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 18(1)

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR851; I(1999)DMC168

Advocate for Respondent : Miss. Smita Mane, Adv.

ORDERA.V. Savant, J.1. Heard all the learned Counsel : Mr. S.V. Kotwal for the petitioner-husband : Miss. Smita Mane for respondent No. 1 wife and Mr. D.N. Salvi, A.P.P. for respondents No. 2 State.2. This petition...

Annasaheb Tukaram Pandit Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 53(1) and 207

Reported in : 2002(4)BomCR200

Advocate for Respondent : A.V. Gore, A.P.P.

S.S. Parkar, J.1. Rule by consent.2. Rule is returnable forthwith. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service on behalf of respondents. Heard both sides finally. 3. By this writ petition, the order detaining motor vehicle belonging to...

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Narayanram Chetanram Chaudhary and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1999)101BOMLR641a

N.J. Pandya, J.1. All the three matters arise out of the judgment in Sessions Case No. 462 of 1994 of the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Pune. The judgment of conviction came to be delivered on...

Kasturchand Ramlal Badjate Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120

Reported in : (1981)83BOMLR8; 1981CriLJ1328

ORDER1. Being aggrieved by an order and judgment dated 29th March, 1980 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad rejecting the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail, the petitioner has filed the present petition.2. The facts, according...

Virendra Mohan Bhardwaj Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 173, 173(5) and 239; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 114, 420, 467, 468 and 471; Evidence Act

Reported in : (2001)4BOMLR531

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Sabarwal, A.P.P.

S.S. Parkar, J.1. The petitioner who is an Advocate has filed the present petition for quashing of Criminal Case No. 2798/P of 1994 pending in the Court of 44th Metropolitan Magistrate, Andheri, Bombay for offences punishable...

Mehtab Khan S/O Madar Khan and ors. Vs. Sarfaraz Khan HussaIn Khan and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200, 202, 202(2) and 482

Reported in : 2001(5)BomCR397; 2001CriLJ895

Advocate for Respondent : Manoj Kumar Misra and Sanjeev Deshpande, Advs. for respondents Nos. 2 to 4. and ;A.G.P. for non applicant No. 5.

S.S. Parkar, J. 1. Heard Mr. M.S. Shaikh learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents.2. This matter has a chequered history. Though complaints were lodged with the police in respect...

Majas Land Development Corporation and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 8 and 9; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 48

Reported in : AIR1983Bom188

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Parkar, Adv.

ORDER1. The facts of this petitioner disclose a scant regard for the citizen's property.2. On 15th Jan. 1969 a notification was issued under S. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act stating that 95,957 sq. yds. of...