Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s s nijjar · Page 1 of about 519 results (0.099 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 09 1995

Hardev Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-09-1995

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1995P& H197; (1995)109PLR690

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Nijjar, Gurdev Singh, Sr. Advs., ;Anil Malhotra and ;Ranjit Malhotra, Advs.

ORDER1. This order would dispose of CWP Nos. 10654 and 16691, both of 1994, as they raise common questions of law.2. Brief facts giving rise to the writ petition first above-mentioned are that the Hindustan Petroleum...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 1993

Union of India Through the Chief Controller Imports and Exports Udyog ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-13-1993

Subject : Company

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 4 (I) and 5; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 25 and 27; Imports and Exports (Control) Order, 1955

Reported in : AIR1994P& H133

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S.S. Nijjar, Sr. Adv.,; Mr. G.S. Bajwa and; Mr. Ajaj

ORDERJawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. TheChief Controller of Imports and Exports Vide his order dated June 4, 1980 (Annexure P. 7) imposed 'a penalty of Rs. 20.00 lacs (Rs.Twenty lacs) jointly on the firm and/or its proprietors...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2003

Baldev Prasad Kashyap Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-07-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Civil Services (General and Common Conditions of Service) Rules, 1994 - Rule 20; Punjab Town Planning State Service (Class-I) Rules, 1972 - Rule 8(2)

Reported in : (2003)135PLR269

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Sran, Addl. A.G.

S.S. Nijjar, J. 1. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the record of the case.2. The petitioner claims to be senior to respondent No. 2 on the post of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 28 2017

Monsanto Technology Llc and Ors. Vs.nuziveedu Seeds Limited & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-28-2017

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sudhir Chandra Agarwala, Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Mr. Abhai Pandey, Ms. Manisha Singh, Ms. Swati Setia, Mr. Obhan, Mr. Abhishek Saket, Mr. Gautam Kumar, Ms. Vijaya Singh

$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on:15. th February, 2017 Pronounced on:28th March, 2017 CS (COMM) 132/2016 - IA No.2406/2016 (O.39 R. 1 & 2 CPC), IA No.9070/2016 (O.39...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 2006

Mohinder Singh Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-12-2006

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Reported in : (2007)4PLR563

S.S. Nijjar, Acting C.J.1. On the request of the counsel for the petitioners, these writ petitions (C.W.P. Nos. 6099, 5437, 2839, 14371, 6258, 7683, 14137, 4818, 14370, 16951, 18572, 4457, 12540, 3768, 2897 of 2005) are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2003

Om Parkash and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-30-2003

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2003)135PLR276

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Sran, Addl. Adv. General

S.S. Nijjar, J.1. have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the record of the case.2. Can the juniors be paid a higher salary than the seniors in the same cadre possessing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2019

The Government of Haryana Pwd Haryana (B and R) Branch Vs. M/S g.f. To ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-03-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.27/2019 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.20201 of 2018) The Government of Haryana PWD Haryana (B and R) Branch …Appellant Versus M/s. G.F. Toll Road...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2002

Techno Fire Protection Services (P.) Ltd. Vs. Mtz Polyesters Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-12-2002

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR466; 2002(3)BomCR533

Advocate for Respondent : Shashi Nair, Adv.

ORDERPratibha Upasani, J.1. These two Notices of Motion, one taken out by the Plaintiffs Techno Fire Protection Services (P.) Ltd., namely, Notice of Motion No. 1056 of 2001 and the other taken out by Defendants MTZ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2004

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Gurvinder Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-12-2004

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2004)IILLJ1138P& H; (2004)136PLR831

S.S. Nijjar, J.1. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners at length and perused the paper-book.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that the recommendation made by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 1989

Himesh Sabhlok Vs. Indian Tele Communication Deptt., Chandigarh and or ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-18-1989

Subject : Civil

Acts : Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1989P& H224

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Brar, Sr. Standing Counsel, Govt. of India and; Raj Kumar Sharma, Adv.

ORDERJai Singh Sekhon, J. 1. Smt. Kaushalya Sabhlok, mother of the petitioner and respondent 3 had been allotted telephone No. Chandigarh-43454. She passed away on 27-1-1986. The petitioner being the son of the deceased applies for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial