Advanced Search Results

Khyali Ram Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1979CriLJ620

D.B. Lal, J.1. This appeal is brought from the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Solan in a case under Sections 363 and 366 of the I. P. Code, wherein Khyali Ram (24 years) stands charged for...

Roop Kishore and anr. Vs. State

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1979CriLJ1176

H.S. Thakur, J.1. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kangra Session Division, at Dharamsala has convicted the appellants for the offences under Sections 307/34, 451/34, 398/34 and 323/34 I.P.C. and has sentenced them for the said offences....

B. Himmat Singka and anr. Vs. Kuldip Industrial Corporation and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1981CriLJ1414

H.S. Thakur, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the appellants/contemners under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the judgment of the learned single Judge (T.R. Handa, J.) whereby the appellants have...

Unique Motors and General Insurance Co. Vs. S.K. Vaiyapuri and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 3(3), 3(4), 3(5), 64-M(3), 110, 114 and 114(3); Insurance Rules, 1939 - Rule 17-H; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1970Delhi90; [1970]40CompCas1025(Delhi); 6(1970)DLT52

Advocate for Respondent : B.R.L. Iyengar, Adv. and ; B.N. Kirpal, Adv. for Attorney-General of India and the Controller of Insura

Jagjit Singh, J.1. The following questions have been referred to the Full Bench by a Division bench of this Court:-'1. Whether Rule 17-H confers power on the Controller of Insurance to cancel the registration of an...

Mehar Chand and ors. Vs. Jagdish Chand Gupta

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 64

Reported in : AIR1970Delhi219

Advocate for Respondent : Kailash Chand and ; S.S. Ahuja, Advs.

Om Parkash, J.1. The facts, in this appeal, against an appellate judgment of the learned District Judge, Simla, briefly, are:-The property, old No. 153, new numbers Shops Nos. 57 and 58, a three storeyed building, situated...

Shiv Nath Vs. Basanta and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Articles 181 and 182; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 48

Reported in : AIR1981HP27

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Ahuja, Adv.

V.D. Misra, C.J.1. This judgment will dis-pore of execution second appeals Nos. 1 and 2 of 1975 since common questions of law and fact have to be decided.2. The relevant facts are these. On 18th January,...

Smt. Pushpawati Vs. United Commercial Bank and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Banking

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Ahuja and; Rakeshwar Lal, Advs.

H.S. Thakur, J. 1. The petitioner has filed this revision petition challenging the order and judgment passed by the learned District Judge, Simla Division, Simla, dated 17th of November, 1978, affirming the order dated 12th December,...

Suraj Mani and anr. Vs. Kishori Lal

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(11) and 11 - Order 22, Rules 3 and 5

Reported in : AIR1976HP74

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Ahuja, Adv.

ORDERR.S. Pathak, C.J.1. This is a defendant's revision petition against an order of the learned Senior Subordinate Judge, Mandi allowing a substitution application.2. One Hari Krishan filed a suit for possession. On December 10, 1971 he...

Mrs. S.S. Ahuja Vs. Pizza Express

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : I(2003)CPJ57MRTP

1. In a complaint filed, the complainant who is a resident of Mumbai, charged the respondent namely, Pizza Express, Connaught Place, New Delhi for having indulged in unfair and restrictive trade practices as covered under Sections...

J.K. Impex and anr. and Mangali Impex Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Customs

Acts : Foreign Trade (Development and Regulations) Act, 1992 - Sections 3, 7, 9, 9(4), 9(5) and 19; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 420; Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 4M and 4N; Foreign Trade (Regulations) Rules, 1993 - Rules 7 and 8B; Imports (Control) Order, 1955

Reported in : 105(2003)DLT605; 2003(71)DRJ709; 2003(89)ECC412; 2004(167)ELT270(Del)

Advocate for Respondent : Maninder Singh and ; N.K. Pandey, Advs.

A.K. Sikri, J.1. The petitioners in both the writ petitions are engaged in the activities of import and export. For the purpose of carrying out the activities of import and export, it is required to have...