Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s raju · Page 1 of about 703 results (0.269 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 19 2011

S.L. RajappA. Vs. State of KarnatakA.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-19-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 302, 309; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 167 (2)

Reported in : 2012CriLJ1979

1. This petition is filed seeking bail in Crime No.32/2010 of Vidhanasoudha Police Station, registered on 08.07.2010 for the offences under Sections 302 and 309, IPC.2. The petitioner is the accused in the case in which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2003

Shivamma Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-17-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 42(9), 47(2) and 47(3)

Reported in : 2003(2)KarLJ71

Advocate for Respondent : H.B. Mahesh, High Court Government Pleader for Respondent 1, ;R.S. Raju, Adv. for Respondent 2 and ;V. Lakshminarayana, Adv. for Respondents 3 to 20

ORDERH.L. Dattu, J.1. Sri H.B. Mahesh, learned Government Pleader is directed to take notice for first respondent. He is permitted to file his memo of appearance within six weeks from today.2. Sri R.S. Raju, learned Counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 1998

Sumithra Devi Vs. G. Venkateshan

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-03-1998

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 19; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : (1999)155CTR(Kar)40; II(1999)DMC655

Advocate for Respondent : S. Raju and ;K.L. Manjunath, Advs.

Hari Nath Tilhari, J.1. Heard Smt. Geetha Menon for Smt. M.N. Pramila Nesargi, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. S. Raju for Mr. K.L. Manjunath, learned Counsel for the respondent.2. This civil revision under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 10 2003

Krishi Foundry Employees Union Vs. Krishi Engines Limited and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-10-2003

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 528, 529 and 529A

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD392; [2003]117CompCas340(AP); (2003)IILLJ798AP

Advocate for Respondent : M. Anil Kumar, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 (Official Liquidator), ;N. Subba Reddy, SC for APIDC for Respondent No. 3 and ;V.S. Raju, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 5 and 6

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, Adv.Introduction1. M/s. Krishi Engines Limited (hereinafter called, holding company) was ordered to be wound up by this Court by judgment dated 16.10.2000 passed in C.P. No. 64 of 1997. The Official Liquidator attached to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2010

D. Ramakrishna Rao S/O. Bangaraiah and ors. Vs. Lrr Hatcheries Pvt. Lt ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-19-2010

Subject : CompanyConstitution

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 394, 397, 398 and 402; ;Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9; ;Constitution of India - Article 136

Advocate for Respondent : V.S. Raju, Adv.

A. Gopal Reddy, J.1. This intra-Court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is directed against the orders of the learned Single Judge, dated 10.7.2001 dismissing the Company Appeal No. 3 of 1999.2. Relevant facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 28 2001

M. Suryanarayana and ors. Vs. Stiles India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-28-2001

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 433(2), 434(1), 439, 483, 529A, 530, 530(1) and 630; Land Reform (frustrated Contracts) Act, 1943; Debtors Act, 1869 - Sections 3(1) and 13

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD185

Advocate for Respondent : V.S. Raju and ;P.V. Rama Raju, Advs.

S.R. Nayak, J.1. O.S.A.NO. 5 of 1998 is directed against the Judgment and order passed by the learned single Judge dated 12.8.1997 passed in C.P. No. 71 of 1996 dismissing the company petition filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 2003

Mohd. NizamuddIn Vs. Shri Shakti Lpg Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-18-2003

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434(1) and 439; Sick Industrial Companies (Special provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16, 16(1), 22 and 22(1)

Reported in : 2003(5)ALD579; 2003(5)ALT590; I(2004)BC79; (2003)4CompLJ408(AP); [2003]46SCL561(AP)

Advocate for Respondent : V.S. Raju, Adv.

ORDERT. Ch. Surya Rao, J.1. Although the petitioners are different, respondent is the same in both the petitions. Both the petitions were filed seeking winding up of the respondent-company under Section 433(e) and (f) of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 28 2001

Mr. M. Suryanarayana Vs. Stiles India Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Di ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-28-2001

Subject : Company

Acts : Letters Patent Act - Sections 483; ;Companies Act - Sections 434(1)

Reported in : [2003]116CompCas448(AP)

Advocate for Respondent : V.S. Raju, Adv. in OSA. No. 5 of 1998 and ;D. Venkata Subbaiah, Adv. in C.P. Nos. 165 & 166/99

ORDERS.R. Nayak, J.1. O.S.A. No. 5 of 1998 is directed against the Judgment and order passed by the learned single Judge dated 12.8.1997 passed in C.P. No. 71 of 1996 dismissing the company petition filed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2001

Gothami Solvent Oils Limited, Pydiparu, Tanuku, W.G. District and Anot ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-26-2001

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10-F, 31, 43A, 108, 173(2) and 176; Constitution of India - Articles 8, 13 and 16-C; Indian Contracts Act, 1872 - Sections 74; Indian Company Act, 1913 - Sections 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 80

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD516

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. V.S. Raju and ;Mr. A. Sanjay Kishore, Advs.

ORDER1. This is an appeal preferred under Section 10-F of the Companies Act by the respondents in CP No.7/111/SRB/ 2000, dated 29-12-2000 on the of the Company Law Board, Southern Region Bench, Chennai. 2. The first...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2008

D. Ramkishore and ors. Vs. Vijayawada Share Brokers Ltd. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-13-2008

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F and 397 to 406; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9

Reported in : [2008]144CompCas326(AP); [2009]89SCL279(AP)

Advocate for Respondent : V.S. Raju, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 22 in C.A. Nos. 288, 289, 290, 291 of 2008 and 1042, 1109, 1171, 1190, 1303 and 1356 of 2007,; C. Kodanda Ram, Adv. for Respondent No. 7 in Company Appeal No.

Ramesh Ranganathan, J.1. This appeal is filed, under Section 10F of the Companies Act 1956, by 22 shareholders of the first respondent-company aggrieved by the order of the Company Law Board in C.P. No. 56 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial