Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s r simhan and · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.025 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 08 1996

Corn Products Company (India) Limited Vs. Ayaz Ghadiya and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-08-1996

Subject : ArbitrationLimitation

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 3, 8, 9, 20, 30 and 33; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Indian Companies Act, 1913; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR1997Bom331; 1997(3)ALLMR91; 1997(3)BomCR83; (1996)98BOMLR902; 1997(2)MhLj83

Advocate for Respondent : S.R. Simhan, Adv., i/b. ;Darryl B. Pereira

ORDER1. By this Petition, the Petitioners seek declaration that there is no valid, binding or subsisting arbitration agreement between the Petition and the 1st Respondent and that the invocation of arbitration pursuant to the arbitration clause...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 1991

Kanak Vinod Mehta Vs. Vinod Dulerai Mehta

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-26-1991

Subject : Family

Acts : Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7(1) and 8; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 4(4); Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 2; The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 27; General Clauses Act, 1897; Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 7; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 42; Evidence Act, 1872; India Lunacy Act, 1912; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR1991Bom337; 1991(2)BomCR170; (1991)93BOMLR409; I(1992)DMC403; 1991(1)MhLj1064

Advocate for Respondent : S.R. Simhan and ;S.K. Parikh, Advs. i/b. ;M/s. Kantilal Parikh & Co.

ORDERBharucha, J.1. A difference having arisen between the views of two learned single Judges of this Court in respect of the interpretation to be placed upon the Family Courts Act, 1984, (hereinafter called 'the said Act'),...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1991

Chatrabhuj Mavji Merchant Vs. Sumati Morarjee and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-13-1991

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 7, 11, 22, 32, 34, 36, 46, 72 and 74; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(4) and 15; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 - Rules 26 and 27; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 12; Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 5 and 8

Reported in : 1991(4)BomCR289

Advocate for Respondent : S.R. Simhan, Adv., i/b., B.R. Chinchkar, Adv.

S.M. Daud, J.1. An issue of some consequence debated fully before this Court, though not raised in the forum below is the subject of this order.2. The appellant-plaintiff has filed a suit in the City Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial