Advanced Search Results
Abbubaker Beary Vs. Tahsildar
Karnataka
Jan-06-1992
CivilTenancy
Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 22 35, 38, 41(2) and 130
ILR1992KAR1779; 1992(2)KarLJ125
S.R. Shetty, Adv. for R-3
ORDERN.D.V. Bhat, J. 1. This Writ Petition is directed against the order dated 27.8.1991 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Kundapur, in No. LRY.SR.2/91.92.2. The facts relevant for the disposal of this Writ Petition briefly stated are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVasant Anant Yeolekar Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Aug-08-1986
Land Acquisition
(1986)LC675Tri(Mum.)bai
1. Revision Application filed before the Government of India against order No. 117 to 118 dated 5-5-1980 passed by the Gold (Control) Administrator statutorily stood transferred to the Tribunal for being heard as appeals. This Revision...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWandrobes and ors. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Dec-31-1991
Excise
(1992)(42)LC86Tri(Delhi)
1. All the three appeals arise from a common order passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore. Hence, they are taken up together for the disposal as per law. By this impugned order, the learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Highland Dye Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
May-10-2000
Excise
(2000)(121)ELT502Tri(Mum.)bai
1. These appeals have been filed by the above appellants against the order No. 31/MP/94 dated 29-1-1994 of Central Excise and Customs, Surat praying of setting aside the same both on grounds of limitation and merits...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamkrishna Girishchandra Dode and Others Vs. Anand Govind Kelkar and O ...
Mumbai
Oct-12-1999
TenancyProperty
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 12, 13, 14, 15-A, and 28; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rules 11(2) and 97 - Order 40, Rule 1; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 108; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45, 47, 67 and 73; Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955
1998(4)ALLMR491; 1999(1)BomCR63
V.A. Thorat, ;V.B. Naik, ;Bharat Mehta, Advs. i/b. ;Kanga & Co.
ORDERA.V. Savant, J.1. Heard all the learned Counsel; Shri B.P Apte, Addl. Advocate General, Shri A.K. Abhyankar, Shri S.M. Paranjape and Shri Vhatkar for the petitioners and Shri V.A. Thorat for the respondents. 2. Writ Petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVirji Nathuram and ors. Vs. Krishnakumar
Mumbai
Oct-05-1984
Tenancy
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 12(3); Constitution of India - Article 227
AIR1985Bom429; 1985(1)BomCR332
K.J. Abhyankar and; C.M. Chokhani, Advs.
ORDER1. This petition under Art. 227 of the Constitution is by 14 persons who are obstructing the execution of a decree obtained by the respondent in a suit, being R.A.E. & R. Suit No.124/856 of 1964...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinkar S. Vaidya Vs. Ganpat S. Gore and ors.
Mumbai
Jul-15-1980
Tenancy
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 5(3), 5(11), 6, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), 13, 13(1), 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(3), 15-A and 28; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3, 105, 108 and 114; Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 60; Constitution of India - Article 227; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control (Amendment) Ordinance, 1959
AIR1981Bom190
M.V. Paranjpe,;D.K. Ghaisas,;S.G. Mandrekar,;D.S. Marathe and;S.M. Mhamane, Advs.
ORDER1. This is an unfortunatepiece of litigation. The petitioner before me was the plaintiff in the trial Court. He got a decree for possession in his favour. The decree was set aside by the appellate Court....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. S.S. Shetty and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-11-2000
Labour and Industrial
Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 92; Maharashtra Factories Rules, 1963 - Rule 65(3)
[2000(87)FLR476]; (2001)ILLJ47Bom
H.S. Murthy and ;R.S. Ghadge, Advs.
D.K. Trivedi, J.1. The State of Maharashtra has filed this appeal and challenged the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Panvel, Raigad dated July 10, 1991 in Summary Case No. 1935 of 1989...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRegional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. B. Rukmini K. Shetty
Karnataka
Jul-31-1990
Labour and Industrial
[1991(62)FLR99]; ILR1990KAR2770; 1990(2)KarLJ151
Mr. P. V. Shetty
Mohan, C.J.1. The facts leading to the writ appeal are shortly as follows : Premises known as 'Hotel Shivaprasad,' situated at Kundapur Town belongs to a partnership firm consisting of the following partners : (1) V....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Rajagopalan Vs. Juanki Ballabh and anr.
Karnataka
Sep-21-2001
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 12
ILR2001KAR5062; 2002(1)KarLJ465
P.S. Rajagopal in W.A. Nos. 2267 to 2277 of 2001, ;M.V. Vedachal, ;Ashok Harnahalli, Advs. and ;Sundaraswamy RamDas and Anand, Advs. in CCC No. 1478 of 2001
ORDERN.K. Jain, C.J.1. This contempt petition has been filed by the complainant for non-compliance with the order dated 30-3-2001 in Writ Petition Nos. 12960 to 12970 of 2001 and W.P. Nos. 12887 to 12903 of 2001...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »