Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s r shetty · Page 1 of about 13 results (0.115 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 06 1992

Abbubaker Beary Vs. Tahsildar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-06-1992

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 22 35, 38, 41(2) and 130

Reported in : ILR1992KAR1779; 1992(2)KarLJ125

Advocate for Respondent : S.R. Shetty, Adv. for R-3

ORDERN.D.V. Bhat, J. 1. This Writ Petition is directed against the order dated 27.8.1991 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Kundapur, in No. LRY.SR.2/91.92.2. The facts relevant for the disposal of this Writ Petition briefly stated are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 1986

Vasant Anant Yeolekar Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-08-1986

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1986)LC675Tri(Mum.)bai

1. Revision Application filed before the Government of India against order No. 117 to 118 dated 5-5-1980 passed by the Gold (Control) Administrator statutorily stood transferred to the Tribunal for being heard as appeals. This Revision...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1991

Wandrobes and ors. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-31-1991

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1992)(42)LC86Tri(Delhi)

1. All the three appeals arise from a common order passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore. Hence, they are taken up together for the disposal as per law. By this impugned order, the learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 10 2000

Highland Dye Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : May-10-2000

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2000)(121)ELT502Tri(Mum.)bai

1. These appeals have been filed by the above appellants against the order No. 31/MP/94 dated 29-1-1994 of Central Excise and Customs, Surat praying of setting aside the same both on grounds of limitation and merits...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 1999

Ramkrishna Girishchandra Dode and Others Vs. Anand Govind Kelkar and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-12-1999

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 12, 13, 14, 15-A, and 28; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rules 11(2) and 97 - Order 40, Rule 1; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 108; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45, 47, 67 and 73; Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955

Reported in : 1998(4)ALLMR491; 1999(1)BomCR63

Advocate for Respondent : V.A. Thorat, ;V.B. Naik, ;Bharat Mehta, Advs. i/b. ;Kanga & Co.

ORDERA.V. Savant, J.1. Heard all the learned Counsel; Shri B.P Apte, Addl. Advocate General, Shri A.K. Abhyankar, Shri S.M. Paranjape and Shri Vhatkar for the petitioners and Shri V.A. Thorat for the respondents. 2. Writ Petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 1984

Virji Nathuram and ors. Vs. Krishnakumar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-05-1984

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 12(3); Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR1985Bom429; 1985(1)BomCR332

Advocate for Respondent : K.J. Abhyankar and; C.M. Chokhani, Advs.

ORDER1. This petition under Art. 227 of the Constitution is by 14 persons who are obstructing the execution of a decree obtained by the respondent in a suit, being R.A.E. & R. Suit No.124/856 of 1964...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1980

Dinkar S. Vaidya Vs. Ganpat S. Gore and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-15-1980

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 5(3), 5(11), 6, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), 13, 13(1), 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(3), 15-A and 28; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3, 105, 108 and 114; Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 60; Constitution of India - Article 227; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control (Amendment) Ordinance, 1959

Reported in : AIR1981Bom190

Advocate for Respondent : M.V. Paranjpe,;D.K. Ghaisas,;S.G. Mandrekar,;D.S. Marathe and;S.M. Mhamane, Advs.

ORDER1. This is an unfortunatepiece of litigation. The petitioner before me was the plaintiff in the trial Court. He got a decree for possession in his favour. The decree was set aside by the appellate Court....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2000

State of Maharashtra Vs. S.S. Shetty and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-11-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 92; Maharashtra Factories Rules, 1963 - Rule 65(3)

Reported in : [2000(87)FLR476]; (2001)ILLJ47Bom

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Murthy and ;R.S. Ghadge, Advs.

D.K. Trivedi, J.1. The State of Maharashtra has filed this appeal and challenged the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Panvel, Raigad dated July 10, 1991 in Summary Case No. 1935 of 1989...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1990

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. B. Rukmini K. Shetty

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-31-1990

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [1991(62)FLR99]; ILR1990KAR2770; 1990(2)KarLJ151

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P. V. Shetty

Mohan, C.J.1. The facts leading to the writ appeal are shortly as follows : Premises known as 'Hotel Shivaprasad,' situated at Kundapur Town belongs to a partnership firm consisting of the following partners : (1) V....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2001

N. Rajagopalan Vs. Juanki Ballabh and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-21-2001

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 12

Reported in : ILR2001KAR5062; 2002(1)KarLJ465

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Rajagopal in W.A. Nos. 2267 to 2277 of 2001, ;M.V. Vedachal, ;Ashok Harnahalli, Advs. and ;Sundaraswamy RamDas and Anand, Advs. in CCC No. 1478 of 2001

ORDERN.K. Jain, C.J.1. This contempt petition has been filed by the complainant for non-compliance with the order dated 30-3-2001 in Writ Petition Nos. 12960 to 12970 of 2001 and W.P. Nos. 12887 to 12903 of 2001...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial