Advanced Search Results

Commr. of Cus. (Port) Vs. Settlement Commission, Cus. and C. Ex.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilCustoms

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Section 127H; ;Income Tax Act, 1961

Reported in : 2005(101)ECC87,2005(179)ELT386(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : S. Pal, Sr. Adv., ;V.N. Dwivedi and ;P.K. Tarafder, Advs.

Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. Both the aforementioned writ petitions are taken up together for hearing, as the issues involved in both the matters are identically same. By the first mentioned writ petition, the petitioner wants to...

Naresh Chandra Ghosh and ors. Vs. Archit Vanijya Viniyog Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 151 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 29, Rule 4, Order 39, Rules 1, 4 and 5;; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 279 and 297;; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 52

Reported in : (1999)3CALLT269(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. Pal, ;U. Majumdar, ;P. Majumdar and others, Advs.

S. B. Sinha, J.1. All these appeals arising out of a common Judgment and order dated 29.1.98 passed by Sri S. Baidya, 9th Civil Judge at Alipore. District South 24-Parganas in Title Suit No. 89/81 weretaken...

Tulsi Baksi and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : West Bengal Primary Education Act, 1973 - Sections 4, 14, 19, 19(1), 22, 26 26A, 26B, 60(1), 106(1) and 106(2); ;West Bengal Primary Education (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 19(1); ;West Bengal Primary Education Regulations; ;West Bengal Primary School Teachers Recruitment Rules, 2001 - Rule 6; ;National Council for Teachers Education Act, 1993 - Section 2, 2(1), 3, 10, 12, 13, 14, 14(1), 14(3), 14(4), 15, 16, 17(4) and 32; ;National Council for Teachers Education (Form of application for recognition, the time limit of submission of application, determination of norms and standards for recognition of teacher education programmes and permission to start new course or training) Regulations, 2002 - Regulation 3; ;Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Act, 1972; ;Uttar Pradesh Basic (Teachers) Servic

Reported in : 2008(4)CHN789,[2009(121)FLR456]

Advocate for Respondent : S. Pal, Sr. Adv. and ;Kallol Bose, Adv.

Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.1. This Public Interest Litigation has been filed on behalf of the petitioner and a serious question has been raised regarding Primary Training Teachers' Institutes, both Government and Private. The complaint is basically...

Goel S. Pal and anr. Vs. Rishi Coop. Group Housing Society Ltd.

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Goel S. Pal

A.P. Chowdhri, President: 1. This appeal arises out of a common order of District Forum-I disposing of Case No. 1913/ 1994, Goel S. Pal v. Rishi Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd. and Others and Case No....

Prem Nath Motors Ltd. Vs. Anurag Mittal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 12B; Contract Act - Sections 230; Consumer Protection Act

Reported in : AIR2009SC567; IV(2008)CPJ37(SC); 2009(1)CTC190; 2008AIRSCW7700

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Puri, ; Dhiraj, ; Sanjeev Sharma and ;

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by Monopolies Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, New Delhi, (in short `Commission') dismissing the application filed by the present appellant.3. Background facts in...

Punjab and Sind Bank Employees Vs. Indian Banks Association and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 and 151 - Order 1, Rules 1, 2 and 10(2) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34

Reported in : (1995)2CALLT138(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : S. Pal, ;P.S. Sengupta and ;Indira Banerjee, Advs. for Opposite Party No. 1 and ;Dipak Kumar Ghosh, Adv. for Opposite Party No. 2

Bijitendra Mohan Mitra, J.1. The present revisional application is directed against order No. 4 dated 3rd February, 1995 passed by the learned Judge, 9th Bench, City Civil Court, Calcutta in T. S. No. 289 of 1995....

Jute Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Nellimaria Jute Mills Co. Ltd. and ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 226 and 229

Reported in : (1993)1CALLT79(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : S. Pal and ;Nadira Patheriya, Advs.

Paritosh Kumar Mukherjee, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the Jute Corporation of India Limited (for brevity called JCI) against the judgment and order dated September 25, 1989 of a learned Single Judge of this...

Heinz Italia S.R.L. and Heinz India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dabur India Ltd., S. ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 30(2) and 35; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 10 - Order 29, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2008(1)CHN508,2008(36)PTC638(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : S. Pal,; Siddartha Mitra,; Hewant Singh,; S. Dutta and; Mousami Bhattacharya, Advs.

Sankar Prasad Mitra, J.1. The first appellant was an Italian Company and affiliate of H.J. Heinz Company and the trade mark GLUCON-D owned by Glaxo India Limited was assigned to the first appellant along with goodwill...

State of Jharkhand and ors. Vs. Bharat Drilling and Foundation Treatme ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34 and 37

Reported in : 2004(1)ARBLR127(Jhar); 2003(3)BLJR1971; [2003(3)JCR269(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : S. Pal, Sr. Adv. and; S.J. Roy, Adv.

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. These appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is directed against the judgments and orders dated 8.1.02 passed by Sub-Judge, Hazaribagh in Miscellaneous (Arbitration) Case No. 2/2001. 3/2001 and...

Somadarsan Mohanty Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and 10 ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(II)OLR452

Advocate for Respondent : M. Agrawala, Standing Counsel (Central) for opp. party No. 1, ;Sovesh Roy, Adv. General for opp. party No. 2, ;S. Pal, ;Gangadhar Rath, ;Ashok Parija, ;Bhupesh Ch. Mohanty and ;Prabhu Pr. Mohanty, A

Sujit Barman Roy, C.J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been styled as a Public Interest Litigation. We have heard the petitioner in person, learned counsel for Union of India, learned...