Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s p patey · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.030 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Feb 21 1984

Shalibai Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-21-1984

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 45(2); Maharashtra Agricultral Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 31, 31(2) and 31(3)

Reported in : AIR1984Bom325

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Patey, Asst. Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. A short but subtle point involved in this writ petitions is about the valldity of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) (Amending) Act, 1976, Maharashtra Act No. 26 of 1976 (for short the Amending...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Aug 09 1984

Laxminarayan Pathak and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-09-1984

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 2A(5); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 31B

Reported in : AIR1986Bom60

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Patey, A.G.P.

1. This is a writ petition arising out of the proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 (for short 'the Ceiling Act'). The S.L.D.T. held that the family unit of the petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Sep 14 1984

Shankarlal Satyanarayan Oil Mills and Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-14-1984

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 31, 34A, 34B and 36

Reported in : AIR1985Bom169; 1985MhLJ259

Advocate for Respondent : M.A. Garud,;V.S. Sohani,;S.Z. Deshbhratar,;D.B. Mirza,;M.P. Badar,;Prakash Bhaiya,;Ram Lambat,;S.J. Jichakar,;V.V. Naik,;A.A. Desai,;Ahmad,;M.M. Gadkari,;B.T. Patil and;A.M. Tayade, Advs.,;S.P. Patey,

Ginwala, J.1. Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions, they can conveniently be disposed of be a common judgment.2. The petitioners in all these petitions are either traders dealing in cotton...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Apr 23 1984

Janabai and Etc. Vs. Laxman Gunaji Wanole and anr., Etc.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-23-1984

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 31-A(1); Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1975 - Sections 5-A

Reported in : AIR1985Bom290; 1985MhLJ265

Advocate for Respondent : B.T. Patil,;B.P. Jaiswal,;A.A. Desai,;S.P. Patey and;V.V. Naik, A.G.Ps

ORDER1. This is a group of writ petitions in which the petitioners, who are non-tribals, challenge the validity of S. 5A of the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 (for short, 'the Act')...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales