Advanced Search Results
Executive Engineer (C), Maharashtra State Electricity Board, Ehv Civil ...
Mumbai
Oct-07-2009
Property
Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 6, 18 and 23
2009(111)BomLR4045
S.P. Dharmadhikari, Sr. Adv., ;B.B. Mehadia, ;D.V. Chauhan, Advs. for Respondent No. 1, ;T.A. Mirza, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in First Appeal No. 141 of 2002, ;T.A. Mirza, Asst
F.M. Reis, J.1. Heard learned Advocates for the parties.2. The appellant ' Executive Engineer in First Appeal No. 141 of 2002, and the Appellant ' Uttamrao Bapurao Raut in First Appeal No. 240 of 2002, are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi and O ...
Mumbai
Apr-22-1997
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 4, 8 and 20
AIR1997Bom395; 1997(3)ALLMR257; 1997(4)BomCR365; 1997(3)MhLj315
S.P. Dharmadhikari, Adv.
1. Admit.Heard finally with the consent of the parties.2. This judgment shall govern appeal Against Order Nos. 12096 and 121/96 as the facts and even the parties are practically identical. By these appeals,the orders passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShankarlal Ganulal Khandelwal Vs. Balmukund Surajmal Bharuka (Deceased ...
Mumbai
Oct-16-1998
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 8, Rule 5 - Order 18, Rule 18; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 92; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54
AIR1999Bom260; 1999(2)ALLMR85; 1999(2)MhLj569
S.P. Dharmadhikari, Adv.
S.D. Gundewar, J.1. By this second appeal, the appellant/original plaintiff challenges the judgment and decree passed against him by the learned District Judge, Buldana in Regular Civil Appeal No. 271/79. That appeal was filed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Santoshidevi Wd/O Radheshayam Sha ...
Mumbai
Nov-21-2003
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A
2004ACJ1524; 2004(2)MhLj273
M.S. Deshpande, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6 and ;S.P. Dharmadhikari, Adv. for Respondent No. 7
S.T. Kharche, J.1. Heard Shri A. J. Pophaly, the learned counsel for the appellant. Shri M. S. Deshpande, the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 6 and Shri S. P. Dharmadhikari, the learned counsel for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKeshav Shankar Ekbote Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-16-2005
Civil
Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 2(7), 16, 16(1), 16(3), 42, 42(1), 44, 55 and 55A; Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Rules; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Rules; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911; Constitution of India - Article 226
2006(1)ALLMR624; 2006(3)BomCR404; 2006(1)MhLj292
N. Jog, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4, ;S.P. Dharmadhikari, Adv. for respondent No. 2 and ;R.L. Khapre, Adv. for respondent No. 5
B.R. Gavai, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.2. By way of present petition, the petitioner assails the order passed by respondent No. 1 thereby dismissing the complaint of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Narayanrao Meshram Vs. The Election Commission of India through ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Jun-07-2016
Land Acquisition
Ms. N.G. Choubey, Shri. A.S. Kilor
Oral Judgment: (B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.) 1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, a citizen of India, claims that Respondent No. 7 has become disqualified and, therefore, ceases to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCitizen Forum For Equality Vs. The State of Maharashtra through its Ch ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Sep-07-2016
Land Acquisition
Shri. S.M. Puranik, Shri. K. Deogade, Shri. A.P. Kalmegh, Shri. C.S. Dharmadhikari, Shri. P.D. Meghe, Shri. D.V. Chauhan
B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. In this Public Interest Litigation basically modification in user of a plot in Development Plan, its allotment to Respondent No. 9, illegal building construction upon it and failure of land owner Nagpur...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmar Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Nagpur
May-04-2016
Criminal
Swapna Joshi, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction dated 24.9.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge6 Nagpur in S.T. No.612/2011 thereby convicting the appellant (ori. accd.No.1-Sumit s/o Ramesh Chintalwar and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMotilal S/O Raghudayal Srivastava Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-13-2004
Service
Bombay Police (Punishments and Appeals) Rules, 1956 - Rules 3 and 4
2004(2)ALLMR350; 2004(5)BomCR386; 2004(2)MhLj277
A.G. Mujumdar, A.G.P. For respondents 1 to 3
B.R. Gavai, J.1. The petitioner has approached this Court, challenging the order passed by the learned Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, dated 2-4-1999, thereby dismissing the Review Application No. 90/97 in Original Application No. 702/91 for setting aside...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Through Its Deputy General Manager Vs. Shri ...
Mumbai
Sep-19-2006
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 5, 7, 21, 21(2), 28 and 32; Bombay Industrial Relations Act - Sections 28 and 35; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 11A; Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act, 1946; Uttar Pradesh Regularisation of Ad hoc Appointments (On posts outside the purview of Public Service Commission) Rules, 1979 - Rules 4 and 9
2007(1)ALLMR800
M.V. Mohokar and ;P.A. Gedam, Advs. and ;The learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No. 2
B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The respective respondent No. 1 in all these petitions filed separately 38 U.L.P. Complaints under Section 28 of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, (hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »