Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s p dharmadhikari · Page 1 of about 53 results (0.064 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 07 2009

Executive Engineer (C), Maharashtra State Electricity Board, Ehv Civil ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-07-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 6, 18 and 23

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR4045

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Dharmadhikari, Sr. Adv., ;B.B. Mehadia, ;D.V. Chauhan, Advs. for Respondent No. 1, ;T.A. Mirza, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in First Appeal No. 141 of 2002, ;T.A. Mirza, Asst

F.M. Reis, J.1. Heard learned Advocates for the parties.2. The appellant ' Executive Engineer in First Appeal No. 141 of 2002, and the Appellant ' Uttamrao Bapurao Raut in First Appeal No. 240 of 2002, are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1997

Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-22-1997

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 4, 8 and 20

Reported in : AIR1997Bom395; 1997(3)ALLMR257; 1997(4)BomCR365; 1997(3)MhLj315

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Dharmadhikari, Adv.

1. Admit.Heard finally with the consent of the parties.2. This judgment shall govern appeal Against Order Nos. 12096 and 121/96 as the facts and even the parties are practically identical. By these appeals,the orders passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 1998

Shankarlal Ganulal Khandelwal Vs. Balmukund Surajmal Bharuka (Deceased ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-16-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 8, Rule 5 - Order 18, Rule 18; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 92; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54

Reported in : AIR1999Bom260; 1999(2)ALLMR85; 1999(2)MhLj569

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Dharmadhikari, Adv.

S.D. Gundewar, J.1. By this second appeal, the appellant/original plaintiff challenges the judgment and decree passed against him by the learned District Judge, Buldana in Regular Civil Appeal No. 271/79. That appeal was filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 21 2003

New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Santoshidevi Wd/O Radheshayam Sha ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-21-2003

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A

Reported in : 2004ACJ1524; 2004(2)MhLj273

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Deshpande, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6 and ;S.P. Dharmadhikari, Adv. for Respondent No. 7

S.T. Kharche, J.1. Heard Shri A. J. Pophaly, the learned counsel for the appellant. Shri M. S. Deshpande, the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 6 and Shri S. P. Dharmadhikari, the learned counsel for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 2005

Keshav Shankar Ekbote Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-16-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 2(7), 16, 16(1), 16(3), 42, 42(1), 44, 55 and 55A; Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Rules; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Rules; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR624; 2006(3)BomCR404; 2006(1)MhLj292

Advocate for Respondent : N. Jog, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4, ;S.P. Dharmadhikari, Adv. for respondent No. 2 and ;R.L. Khapre, Adv. for respondent No. 5

B.R. Gavai, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.2. By way of present petition, the petitioner assails the order passed by respondent No. 1 thereby dismissing the complaint of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 2016

Sanjay Narayanrao Meshram Vs. The Election Commission of India through ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jun-07-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. N.G. Choubey, Shri. A.S. Kilor

Oral Judgment: (B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.) 1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, a citizen of India, claims that Respondent No. 7 has become disqualified and, therefore, ceases to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2016

Citizen Forum For Equality Vs. The State of Maharashtra through its Ch ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Sep-07-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. S.M. Puranik, Shri. K. Deogade, Shri. A.P. Kalmegh, Shri. C.S. Dharmadhikari, Shri. P.D. Meghe, Shri. D.V. Chauhan

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. In this Public Interest Litigation basically modification in user of a plot in Development Plan, its allotment to Respondent No. 9, illegal building construction upon it and failure of land owner Nagpur...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2016

Amar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : May-04-2016

Subject : Criminal

Swapna Joshi, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction dated 24.9.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge6 Nagpur in S.T. No.612/2011 thereby convicting the appellant (ori. accd.No.1-Sumit s/o Ramesh Chintalwar and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 2004

Motilal S/O Raghudayal Srivastava Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-13-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Police (Punishments and Appeals) Rules, 1956 - Rules 3 and 4

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR350; 2004(5)BomCR386; 2004(2)MhLj277

Advocate for Respondent : A.G. Mujumdar, A.G.P. For respondents 1 to 3

B.R. Gavai, J.1. The petitioner has approached this Court, challenging the order passed by the learned Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, dated 2-4-1999, thereby dismissing the Review Application No. 90/97 in Original Application No. 702/91 for setting aside...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2006

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Through Its Deputy General Manager Vs. Shri ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-19-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 5, 7, 21, 21(2), 28 and 32; Bombay Industrial Relations Act - Sections 28 and 35; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 11A; Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act, 1946; Uttar Pradesh Regularisation of Ad hoc Appointments (On posts outside the purview of Public Service Commission) Rules, 1979 - Rules 4 and 9

Reported in : 2007(1)ALLMR800

Advocate for Respondent : M.V. Mohokar and ;P.A. Gedam, Advs. and ;The learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No. 2

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The respective respondent No. 1 in all these petitions filed separately 38 U.L.P. Complaints under Section 28 of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, (hereinafter referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial