Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s n tripathi · Page 1 of about 136 results (0.075 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 03 2002

Raghuvir Singh Vs. Raj Kumar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-03-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1)

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC1955

Advocate for Respondent : Vishnu Sahai and ;H.S.N. Tripathi, Advs. and ;B. Dayal, S.C.

Anjani Kumar, J.1. Heard Shri P.N. Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vishnu Sahai and Shri H.S.N. Tripathi for the contesting respondents.2. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner-tenant seeking quashing of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1995

K.P.L. Packaging Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-21-1995

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1995(79)ELT12(All)

Advocate for Respondent : H.S.N. Tripathi, Adv.

ORDER1. Heard counsel for the petitioner and Shri H.S.N. Tripathi for Union of India.2. The contention of the petitioner is that as a result of the decision given by Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 2002

Dr. Nilambhar Jha Vs. Special Judge/Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-10-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1)

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC684

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Tripathi, Adv.

S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, inter alia, praying for quashing the judgment and order dated 25.11.2002 (Annexure-7 to the writ petition) passed by the learned Special Judge (Anti Corruption)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 03 2005

Govind Prasad Son of Sri Jhinku Prasad Vs. State of U.P. Through Secre ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-03-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 95(1); Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhan, Up-Pradhan and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997 - Rules 4 and 5

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC704

Advocate for Respondent : H.S.N. Tripathi, ;P.S. Tripathi and ;A.A. Khan, Advs. and ;S.C.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri A.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri H.S. N. Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5 and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4.2. Petitioner, Govind...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1993

Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Ltd. Vs. Controlling Authority Under Paymen ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-03-1993

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 7(4) and 7(7)

Reported in : (1993)IILLJ1108All

Advocate for Respondent : H.S.N. Tripathi, S.C.

D.S. Sinha, J. 1. Heard Sri Shashi Nandan, learned counsel appearing for M/s. Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Ltd., Baitalpur, Deoria, the petitioner, and Sri. H.S.N. Tripathi, learned counsel representing the contesting respondent No. 3 in each...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 2003

Ram Prakash Pandey and anr. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-16-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 20; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(4)AWC2753

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Tripathi, Adv. and ;S.C.

Ashok Bhushan, J 1. Heard counsel for the petitioners and Sri S. N. Tripathi learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondent.2. Counter and rejoinder-affidavits have been exchanged and with the consent of the parties the writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2001

Prabhunath Dixit Vs. Iiird Addl. District Judge, Deoria and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-06-2001

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : 2001(3)AWC2362A

Advocate for Respondent : H.S.N. Tripathi, Adv. and ;S.C.

S.K. Singh, J. 1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the judgment of IIIrd Additional District Judge. Deoria (now known district Kushinagar). By the judgment impugned in this writ petition, the amendment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2002

Smt. Swatantrata Devi and anr. Vs. Iiird Additional District Judge, De ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-15-2002

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 123

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC2018

Advocate for Respondent : H.S.N. Tripathi, S.C.

S.N. Srivastava, J.1. By way of this writ petition, the ex parte decree dated 14.9.1983 in O.S. No. 1017 of 1983, Annexure-5 and order dated 18.4.1994, passed by O.P. No. 2, Annexure-10, rejecting restoration application and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1998

Committee of Management, Dwarika Prasad Secondary School, Jaunpur Vs. ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-01-1998

Subject : Election

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 16A(7); Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 3A, 4, 4(1) and 25

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC2169; (1998)3UPLBEC1925

Advocate for Respondent : S.C., ;H.S.N. Tripathi and ;S.K. Pandey, Advs.

O.P. Gars, J. 1. These are two connected writ petitions in which common questions of law and facts are involved. They are, therefore, being decided by this common judgment.2. There is a registered society, known as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 1995

Allen Bradely India Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-21-1995

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35

Reported in : 1995(79)ELT196(All)

Advocate for Respondent : H.S.N. Tripathi, Adv.

ORDERA.P. Misra, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri H.S.N. Tripathi appearing for the respondents who has filed his appearance on behalf of the respondents.2. In view of the fact and circumstances of this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial