Advanced Search Results

Raj Kumar Ishwar Dass Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 310

Reported in : AIR1965P& H221; (1968)ILLJ755P& H

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Shankar, Central Govt. Counsel,; Murli Manohar Vyas and;

S.K. Kapur, J.1. The facts of this case admit of being stated in a very narrow compass In May 1963 the petitioner who was then working as a Secretary to the Government of Rajasthan in the...

Shri Kewal Kishan Om Parkash Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1966]18STC402(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Shankar, Central Government Counsel

S.K. Kapur, J.1. This reference made to this Court by the Chief Commissioner of Delhi under Section 21 of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, arises in the following circumstances. The firm Kewal Kishan Om...

A.D.M. Stores and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Sales TaxCivil

Reported in : [1966]18STC305(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Shankar and; N.S. Rao, Advs.

R.S. Narula, J.1. The petitioners were registered dealers under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, as extended to Delhi and as amended up to 1958 (hereinafter called the Act). Returns of their taxable turnover for...

Juginder Nursery Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1966]18STC343(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Shankar and; N. Srinivasa Rao, Advs.

Inder Dev Dua, J.1. The short question falling for decision in this reference is whether flower plants are exempted under item No. 7 of the Second Schedule to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, as...

Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secy. Ministry of Communication, Govt ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 122; Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : AIR1966P& H500

Advocate for Respondent : Hardayal Hardy, Sr. Adv. and; Keshav Dayal, Adv.

1. This judgment will dispose of Regular First Appeal No. 81-D of 1960 and Regular First Appeal No. 23-D of 1961, which are in the nature of cross-appeals against the judgment and decree of Shri O....

M/S. Arosan Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30; Benjamin's Sale of Good Act

Reported in : AIR1999SC3804; JT1999(7)SC122; 1999(6)SCALE46; (1999)9SCC449; [1999]Supp2SCR621

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Dholakia and ; A. Francis Julian, Advs. for ; Arputham A

ORDERUmesh C. Banerjee, J.1. These two Appeals by the grant of Special Leave and arising out of the Judgment of the Delhi High Court focus two singularly singular questions pertaining to (i) the time being the...

Union of India, Delhi Vs. Roshan Lal and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 149

Reported in : AIR1968Delhi165; 4(1968)DLT22

Advocate for Respondent : Raghubir Singh, Adv.

(1) The only question with which we are concerned at this stage is whether the appeal was presented in this Court within time and, if nto, should the time be extended and the delay condoned. (2)...

Bhagwan Dass Vs. the Appellate Officer and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evacuees Interest (Separation) Act, 1951 - Sections 5, 8, 10, 12 and 48

Reported in : AIR1967P& H206

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Shanker, Adv. (for Nos. 1 to 3),; K.R. Khanna and;

ORDERS.K. Kapur, J.1. The facts in this writ petition are numerous but having regard to the limited question raised at the bar, it would be necessary only to state a few of them. The petitioner, along...

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 246, 246(4), 289(1) and 372-A; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911; Government of India Act, 1935; Delhi Laws Act, 1912; Union Territories Laws Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1975Delhi223; ILR1975Delhi84

Advocate for Respondent : Bikramjit Navyar, Adv.

H.L. Anand, J.1. The principal question that those petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the States of Andhra Pradesh. Jammu and Kashmir and Punjab, in one of which the State of Orissa...

H.R. Wool Trading Co. and ors. Vs. Ram Lal and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 5(2)

Reported in : ILR1974Delhi1b

T.V.R. Tatachari, J.(1) This Letters Patent Appeal came up originally before S. N. Andley, C. J. and Prakesh Narain, J. on February 19, 1974, for admission. Notice was ordered to the respondents by the Division Bench...