Advanced Search Results

M/S. Gujarat Composite Ltd. Vs. C.C.E. Ahmedabad-i

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. In this Miscellaneous Application, Shri S.N. Pal, learned Advocate, assisted by Shri S.K. Majumdar, learned Advocate, appearing on behalf of the appellants/applicants makes a prayer for modification of the Stay Order No.S-1422/Cal/2000 dated 9.11.2000 whereunder...

Hdfc Bank Ltd. Vs. Surendra Kumar Jaiswal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Contempt of Court

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. N. Pal, Sr. ; Mr. D. K. Singh, Advs.

The Court : Notwithstanding the express direction of this Court directing the respondent No.1 to inform the petitioner of the location of the vehicle and also to make over possession of the vehicle to the learned...

Bibi Asiran Vs. Mobarak Ansari

Court : Patna

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 and 397; Muslim Law

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Pal, M. Prasad and B.K. Dubey

Dharmpal Sinha, J.1. This Criminal Revision is directed against a part of the impugned judgment and order dated 27.11.1991 passed by the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Lohardaga, in Case No. 4(M) of 1979, whereby the learned Sub-divisional...

Paul Brothers (Tailoring Division) and Others Vs. Ashim Kumar Mondal a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Gold Control Authority Act, 1976; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 156; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : [1990]2SCR283

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Kapoor, ; P.K. Pillai, ; D.K. Sinha R. Paul and ;

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. These appeals arise as a sequel to certain directions of this Court in the famous Sanchaita case. The Sanchaita Investment Company was a firm which was controlled and run, primarily, by three persons...

Joydeb Chandra Dey and ors. Vs. Sukumar Chandra Dey and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1976 - Order 23, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR2006Cal315,2006(3)CHN550

Advocate for Respondent : Ajoy Kumar Chatterjee, Adv. for the Defendant No. 1 and ;Dipak Kumar Basu and ;A, Dutta, Advs. for the Defendant No. 2

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.1. This Letters Patent appeal is at the instance of the plaintiffs in a suit for declaration, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction and is directed against the judgment and decree dated 8th March, 2002,...

Mackintosh Burn Limited and anr. Vs. Nu-built Construction Private Ltd ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 115 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14(1), 41 and 42

Reported in : (1992)1CALLT151(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Das, ;P.S. Biswas and ;C.K. Mitra, Advs. for the Opposite Party No. 1 and ;A.K. Jana, Adv. for the Opposite Parties Nos. 2 and 3

Khwaja Mohammad Yusuf, J.1. This is an application Under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure where the judgment dated 9th January, 1991 passed by the learned District Judge, North 24-Parganas, in Misc. Appeal No....

Ex Maj Yr Sharma Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The challenge in this O.A is directed against the General Court Martial proceedings, whereby the applicant was held guilty of having committed the offences under Army Act Sections 52(f) and 63 and sentenced him to...