Advanced Search Results
R.S. Ramachandran Vs. Contempt Proceedings Initiated by the Court on I ...
Delhi
Aug-11-1975
CriminalContempt of Court
Contempt of Court Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)
ILR1975Delhi868
Mr. Mehta, Mr. S. N. Mehta
S. Rangarajan, J.(1) The respondent (R. S. Ramachandran). Editor of a Weekly called 'Crusader', not only wrote a letter to the Registrar of this Court on 3rd June 1974 but also published the contents of that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBarot Jignesh Lakshmansinh Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Apr-10-2003
Service
Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 5; Recruitment Rules, 1998; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4), 16, 16(4), 226, 315, 320, 320(1), 320(3) and 330 to 342; Indian Penal Code; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)
(2003)2GLR1727; (2003)2GLR807
S.N. Shelat, AG,; Manishal Shah, AGP and; B.D. Jani,
Jayant Patel, J.1. In all this group of petitions the facts are interconnected and to some extent the issues involved are also interconnected and therefore they are being dealt with by this common judgment.2. The short...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOil and Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Engineering Majdoor Sangh
Gujarat
May-12-2005
Labour and Industrial
Employment Exchange (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F, 25G, 25H, 25K(2), 25M, 25N, 25T, 25U, 33(1) and 33A; Minimum Wages Act; Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act, 1959 - Sections 32; Evidence Act; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2(1); Contempt of Courts Act; Oil and Natural Gas Commission (Recruitment and Promotion) Regulations, 1980; Oil and Natural Gas Commission (Recruitment and Promotion) Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 37, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 51A, 226 and 227
(2005)3GLR2152; (2006)ILLJ587Guj
Girish Patel, Sr. Adv. and; Shalin N. Mehta, Adv. for Respondent No. 1
ORDERS FOR CONTINGENT EMPLOYEES OF THE OIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSION' in force since 15.7.1962 applied to all workmen called 'contingent employees' employed in various units of the ONGC excluding the regular employees to whom other...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Chanderwati and ors. Vs. Lakhmi Chand
Delhi
Feb-24-1987
Tenancy
Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17 and 49; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 5, 53 and 53A
AIR1988Delhi13; 1987(13)DRJ248
S.S. Chadha, J. (1) This appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent. against the judgment of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yogeshwar Dayal has arisen on these facts and grounds.(2) Shri Manna Singh and Shri Lakhmi Chand...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOm Parkash Vs. State
Delhi
May-03-1979
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154
1979CriLJ141; 16(1979)DLT281
V.D. Misra, J. (1) Om Parkash alias Omi and Chuni Lal have been convicted under section 302/34, Indian Penal Code, and each of them has been sentenced to imprisonment for life by Mr. R. L. Gupta,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShantiniketan Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. Vs. District Registrar, Co-o ...
Gujarat
Apr-29-2002
Trusts and SocietiesProperty
Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 22 and 22(1); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 11
AIR2002Guj428; (2002)2GLR1768
Girish Patel, Adv. for; Shalin N. Mehta, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3
Jayant Patel, J.1. Rule. Mr. I. M. Pandya, learned A.G.P., waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No. 1 and Mr. Girish Patel, Sr. Counsel for Mr. Shalin Mehta waives service of rule for respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Purshottam Harjivan Shah
Mumbai
Nov-20-1945
Criminal
AIR1946Bom492; (1946)48BOMLR379
Divatia, J.1. This is an application in revision by accused Nos. 1 and 2 against their convictions and sentences under Section 13(1) read with Section 6 of the Hoarding and Profiteering Prevention Ordinance. The case for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Gulam Vs. the State
Delhi
Apr-27-1979
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27
16(1979)DLT249
Prithvi Raj, J. (1) Ram Gulam was tried by Shri R. L. Gupta, Additional Sessions Judge, under Section 366, Indian Penal Code for having kidnapped Pushpa a minor aged 7 years and also under section 376,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarendra Mehta and Others Vs. Commissioner of Customs,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Jun-29-2001
MRTP
(2001)(137)ELT1009Tri(Bang.)
1. The appellant No.1 is the sole proprietor of firm M/s N. Mehta & Co., Bombay. The firm filed as an exporter Shipping Bills dt 30.3.84, for export of 989 pieces of filament/jari/pure silk sarees in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarendra Mafatlal Mehta Vs. Union of India and Others
Mumbai
Jan-16-1986
Customs
Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947; Imports (Control) Order, 1955
1987(11)ECC76; 1987(30)ELT65(Bom)
1. The petitioner is carrying on business in the name and style of M/s. N. Mehta & Company and importing rough and exporting cut and polished diamonds. The respondents are the officers conferred with statutory responsibilities...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »