Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s n kakkar · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.057 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 04 1962

Bhagwati Prasad Bajoria and ors. Vs. British India Corporation Ltd. an ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-04-1962

Subject : CompanyCivil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 398; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 20, Rule 3; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 6, 7 and 9

Reported in : AIR1964All75

Advocate for Respondent : Satish Chandra, ;R.S. Pathak and ;S.N. Kakkar, Advs.

Oak, J. 1. I agree with my learned brother that the application should be allowed. I would like to add a few words on the question of maintainability of the application.2. Mr. S.N. Kakkar appearing for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 1960

Laxmi Chand Agarwal Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-28-1960

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 58, 69A and 69A(4)

Reported in : AIR1962All117

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Khare, Adv. and ;Shambhu Pd., Standing Counsel

Jagdish Sahai, J.1. The petitioner Laxmi Chand Agarwal is the Executive Officer of the Municipal Board, Hapur (hereinafter referred to as the Board), having been appointed to that post in the year 1931. Sri K. C....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 1964

Brijmohan Lal Vs. Election Tribunal Allahabad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-12-1964

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 86 and 116A

Reported in : AIR1965All450

Advocate for Respondent : J.N. Agarwal and ;M.L. Agarwal, Advs.

Dhavan, J. 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution filed by a respondent in the election petition which is pending against him. It involves an important question of law--namely, whether a Tribunal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 10 1964

Satya Prakash Agarwal Vs. the State Transport Appellate Tribunal and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-10-1964

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 57 and 57(4)

Reported in : AIR1965All194

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Katju, Adv. and ;S.C.

H.C.P. Tripathi, J.1. This writ petition is directed against an order dated 31-7-63 of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal Lucknow, setting aside a resolution of the Regional Transport Authority Bareilly granting permit for a stage carriage...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 1962

Karnail Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-03-1962

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 68, 68D, 68I and 68I(1); Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 7

Reported in : AIR1963All337

Advocate for Respondent : Shanti Bhushan, Adv.

ORDERV.G. Oak, J.1. These two connected writ petitions are directed against two notifications issued by the State Government under the Motor Vehicles Act (Act No. IV of 1939 hereafter referred to as the Act). Since the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 1961

Harbanswala Tea Estate Vs. Srivastava (J.N.) (Regional Conciliation Of ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-23-1961

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1962)IILLJ702All

V.G. Oak, J.1. This writ petition is directed against an award delivered by an arbitrator. Harbansiwala Tea Estate, Debra Dan, are the petitioner. Sri Mehra, who is the manager of the petitioner estate, has filed an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 1971

isherdas Sahni and Brothers Vs. the District Magistrate, Lucknow and a ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-20-1971

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 13; Uttar Pradesh Cinematograph Rules, 1951 - Rule 2; Cinematograph Act, 1918 - Sections 5(3) and 9

Reported in : AIR1972All83

Advocate for Respondent : Chief Standing Counsel and ;S.C. Khare, Adv.

Gur Sharan Lal, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioner firm, namely, Isherdas Sahni and Brothers, seeks to get quashed by a writ in the nature of certiorari or like writ, order or direction, three orders...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1974

Ravi Kiran JaIn Vs. Bar Council of U.P. Through Its Secretary and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-30-1974

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 15(2); Uttar Pradesh Bar Council Rules, 1958 - Rules 4 and 6; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1974All211

Advocate for Respondent : B.S. Nischal, ;Sudhir Chand, ;Shanti Bhushan and ;Chandra Kishore, Advs.

ORDERK.N. Singh, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution claiming relief for the issue of a writ of certiorari quashing the resolution of the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh dated 4th November,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1961

Ram Charan Agarwala and ors. Vs. Shridhar Misra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-24-1961

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 1, 2, 12 and 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1962All610

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Pathak, Adv.

Jagdish Sahai, J. 1. These four connected appeals are directed against the decree passed by our brother Oak in exercise of the original civil jurisdiction of this Court in three consolidated suits. The three suits relate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1963

Udhoo Dass Vs. Prem Prakash and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-06-1963

Subject : TenancyContract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 23; Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act - Sections 7(2); Uttar Pradesh Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR1964All1

Advocate for Respondent : J. Swarup, ;S.N. Misra, ;S.N. Kakkar, ;S.K. Suri, ;A. Mohiley, ;R.N. Bhalla, ;Sridhar and ;B.P. Srivastava, Advs.

Desai, C.J.1. The following question has been referred to this Bencn for its opinion:--'Whether a contract of tenancy of an accommodation governed by the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and EVICtion Act entered into by a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial