Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s manikumar · Page 1 of about 2,036 results (0.071 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 28 2006

T. Jagadeesan Vs. the Director General, Central Industrial Security Fo ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-28-2006

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (2006)2MLJ140

Advocate for Respondent : S. Manikumar, SCGSC

ORDERN. Paul Vasanthakumar, J.1. In this writ petition, petitioner challenges the transfer order issued by the 4th respondent in his office memorandum No. E.38014(1)/1/ 2 006/Adm/302, dated 21.2.2006.2. Petitioner is working as Head Constable in Central...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 1997

K. Uma Mahesh Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Secretary to Go ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-21-1997

Subject : Service

Acts : Tamil Nadu Anatomy Act -- 1951; Constitution of India -- Article 226; Transplantation of Human Organs Act -- 1994;

Reported in : AIR1998Mad283; 1998(1)CTC16; (1998)IMLJ381

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. Manikumar, Additional Government Pleader (E)

ORDER1. In Writ Petition No. 5215 of 1996 the petitioner seeks to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to accept the petitioner's body for the purpose of anatomical dissection, treatment, medical relief, including transplant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2005

Ms. A. Arulmozhi Vs. the Govt. of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-05-2005

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 5A, 5B, 5B(1), 5B(2), 6 and 7; ;Tamil Nadu (Compulsory Censorship of Film Publicity Materials) Act - 1987; ;Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 292, 336, 353 and 354; Constitution of India - Article 19(1) and 19(2)

Reported in : (2005)3MLJ497

Advocate for Respondent : S. Manikumar, Sr. Central Govt. Standing Counsel for Nos. 1 and 2 and ;Ezhilmani, Adv. for No. 3

M. Karpagavinagayam, J.1. Tamil feature film 'New', produced by Annai Mari Madha Creations, third respondent herein, was released for public exhibition in the second week of July, 2004, throughout Tamil Nadu.2. Ms. Arulmozhi, an advocate practising...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 14 2005

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Rep. by Its Executive Director, Southern ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-14-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 10(1) and 15

Reported in : (2005)IIILLJ482Mad; (2005)3MLJ30

Advocate for Respondent : R. Natarajan, Adv. for respondent 1 and ;S. Manikumar, Sr. Central Govt. Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 3

Markandey Katju, C.J.1. This writ appeal has been filed against the impugned order of the learned single Judge dated 27.9.2002.2. We have heard Mr. AL. Somayaji, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, Mr. R. Natarajan, learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 1996

Rahamathulla Vs. Piyare and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-11-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 123, 125, 125(1) and 127

Reported in : 1996CriLJ4322; II(1996)DMC295

Advocate for Respondent : S. Manikumar, Adv.

ORDER1. An important question of law, that too, of general importance is as to whether a minor child of divorced Muslim wife is entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2007

Raghubir Prasad Garg, Proprietor, Bhagwati Steel Trading Co. Vs. Prahi ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-28-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instrument Act - Sections 138 and 139; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200, 207 and 255(1)

Reported in : II(2007)BC387

Advocate for Respondent : E.C. Ramesh, Adv.

A.C. Arumugaperumal Adityan, J.1. These appeals have been preferred against Judgment in C.C. No. 5088 & 5094 of 1997 respectively on the file of the Court of VII Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Madras.2. In Crl.A. No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2006

V. Sampath Vs. the Officer-in-charge, Sena Seva Corps Abhilekh, Yantri ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-29-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Pension Regulations, 1961

Reported in : (2006)2MLJ781

Advocate for Respondent : S. Manikumar, SCGSC

P. Sathasivam, J.1. The above writ appeal has been filed against the order of the learned single Judge, dated 25.7.2001 made in W.P.No.4028 of 1995, in and by which, the learned Judge after finding that the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2007

The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs. G. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-29-2007

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 163A

Reported in : 2008ACJ1773

Advocate for Respondent : M. Jayapal Raja, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;T.D. Vasu, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

S. Manikumar, J.1. Aggrieved by an order dated 09.05.2001 passed in M.C.O.P. No. 5 of 2000 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (Additional District Judge), Nagapattinam, the Transport Corporation has preferred this appeal....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2007

Aditya Envirotech Private Limited Vs. Commercial Tax Officer

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-06-2007

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 3(5), 23, 45(2) and 55

Reported in : (2008)16VST145(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Mahadevan, Additional Government Pleader (Taxes)

ORDERS. Manikumar, J.1. The petitioner has sought a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to quash the impugned records of the respondent in TNGST/0902571/2004-05 dated October 16, 2006 and direct the respondent to grant concessional rate of tax...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2007

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs. Sambandam

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-29-2007

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 33

Reported in : 2009ACJ203

Advocate for Respondent : A. Muthukumaran, Adv.

S. Manikumar, J.1. Aggrieved by the award dated 2.11.1999 made in M.C.O.P. No. 111 of 1997 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional Subordinate Judge), Mayiladuthurai, the transport Corporation has preferred this appeal.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial