Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s m yusuf · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.085 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 15 1989

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Pankali and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-15-1989

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1990)ACC655

N.N. Mithal, J. 1. These three appeals have been filed against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal in a petition under Section 110-AofMotor Vehicles Act, 1939,2. The Tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs. 90$00/-...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 1951

The Unao Commercial Bank Ltd. Vs. Hari Saran Das

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-20-1951

Subject : BankingCivil

Acts : Debt Law; Uttar Pradesh Agriculturists' Relief Act, 1934 - Sections 3, 4 and 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1951All641

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Yusuf, Adv.

Kidwai, J. 1. On 6-3-1935, the Unnao Commercial Bank, Ltd., obtained a decree for Rs, 11,150-9-6 & Rs. 748-8 costs against Bhaya Hari Saran Das. The decretal amount was to carry interest at 6%.2. The U....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1956

Bhagwati Prasad Vs. J.K. Tandon and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-09-1956

Subject : Election

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 12(1) and 12C; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules, 1947 - Rules 16, 16A and 25; Constitution of India - Article 329; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 80

Reported in : AIR1957All354

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Dhaon and ;B.N. Roy, Advs. for 1, 2 and 4 and ;S.M. Yusuf, Adv. for No. 3

Mootham, C.J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution which raises a question of some importance as to the powers of the Director of Elections appointed under the Panchayat Raj Rules.2. The relevant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 02 1987

Batliboi and Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-02-1987

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1987)(13)LC833Tri(Delhi)

1. The appellants imported "Horizontal Boring and Milling Machines Model. Skada W200 GNR with accessories" under Bill of Entry No.2270/17, dated 15th March, 1979. There is no dispute about the classification of the goods under Heading...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1949

Maharaj Bux and ors. Vs. Rex

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-25-1949

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 367

Reported in : AIR1952All433

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Yusuf, Adv. Holding brief of ;Asst. G.A.

ORDERDesai, J. 1. The applicants were prosecuted alongwith Abu Turab under Sections 147 325 and 323, PenalCode. The trial Court, S. D. M. Sultanpur, convictedthe applicants and acquitted Abu Turab. Theyappealed against that decision to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 1950

Raj Kuer Vs. Rajendra Bahadur Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-07-1950

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53, 53(1) and 122; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2 - Order 8, Rule 9

Reported in : AIR1951All443

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Yusuf, Adv. Respondent No. 1

Kidwai, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit instituted by Raj Kuer, appellant, on 26-2-1944, for recovery of possession of a house situate in village Bargawan, in the district of Sitapur, against the heirs of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1951

Samresh Singh Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-24-1951

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342 and 367 ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 103

Reported in : AIR1953All781

Advocate for Respondent : M.H. Faruqi and ;S.M. Yusuf, Advs.

ORDERBeg, J. 1.This is a revision on behalf of one Samresh Singh, who has been convicted under Section 408, Penal Code, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Bahraich and sentenced to three months' rigorous imprisonment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial