Advanced Search Results

India Foils Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules - Rule 8(1); ;Indian Tariff Act - Section 2A; ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 3

Reported in : 1982(10)ELT966(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Sanyal, Adv.

P.C. Borooah, J.1. India Foils Ltd. the petitioner No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the company carries on business in the manufacture and sale of aluminium foils of diverse varieties including foils known as tea chest...

Sukharanjan Sarkar Vs. Mackinnon Mackenzie and Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. and anr ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1974CriLJ1446

A.N. Banerjee, J.1. This Rule was obtained against an order dated 8-8-73 rejectingan application under Section 145 of Merchant Shipping Act. 1958. On 20-2-72 the petitioner filed an application before the Chief Presidency Magistrate claiming a...

Capt. U.R. Roy Choudhury Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ796

A.N. Banerjee, J.1. These two appeals arising out of the same judgment were heard together and would be governed by the following judgment:On 11-7-67, Dy. Supdt. of Police, Special Police Establishment, Division C.B.I., Calcutta filed a...

Pramila Chakraborty and ors. Vs. the Superintendent, Hoogly Jail and a ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1973CriLJ407

Anil Kumar Sen, J.1. These three Rules issued on three applications under Section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have been heard together as they involve common questions of law and fact. The subject-matter of...

New Beerbhoom Coal Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Joint Director of Mines, Safe ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Section 57; ;Coal Mines Regulations, 1957 - Regulation 191(1) and 191(2); ;Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 19(6) and 23

Reported in : AIR1973Cal17

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Sanyal, Adv.

ORDERAnil Kumar Sen, J.1. These three Rules were issued on as many Writ petitions filed by the petitioners under Article 226(1) of the Constitution. The petitioners are New Beerbhoom Coal Co. Ltd. Bengal Coal Co. Ltd.,...

Duncan Agro Industries Ltd. Vs. Central Board of Excise and Customs

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 11B and 35A; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2, 10, 11 and 173J; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1985(22)ELT770(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Dey and ;S.M. Sanyal, Advs.

A.K. Sen Gupta, J.1. National Tobacco Company of India Limited moved this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the legality and validity of a notice dated 14th April, 1975, issued by the...

R.K. Chemical Industries Private Ltd. Vs. Superintendent of Central Ex ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 2; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1) and 173B

Reported in : 1984(2)ECC341,1984(15)ELT411(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Sanyal, Adv.

Ashamukul Pal, J.1. This is an application made by R.K. Chemical Industries Pvt. Ltd. under Article 226 of the Constitution for issuance of a Writ against the Superintendent of Central Excise and the Assistant Collector of...

Baidyanath Basak and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Customs

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19, 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 21, 22 and 22(1); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193, 228, 323, 330, 426 and 448; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 161(1), 161(2), 175, 218, 219, 219(1), 220, 221 and 223; ;Customs Ordinance - Section 116; ;Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 8, 8(1), 34, 35, 71, 71(1), 71(2) 74, 123(1) and 123(2); ;Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108, 111, 112, 119, 121, 123, 124, 127, 135, 136, 136(1), 136(2) and 145(2); ;Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167(1), 167(3), 167(8), 167(81), 171A, 178A, 182 and 186; ;Forgien Exchange Regulation Act - Section 23; ;Evidence Act - Sections 2, 21, 24 and 132; ;General Clauses Act - Sections 3(38), 26; ;Gold (Control) Rules; ;Gold (Control) Orders

Reported in : 1986(9)ECC109,1988(17)LC781(Calcutta),1987(30)ELT198(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Sanyal, Adv.

Manashnath Roy, J.1. On or about 30th March, 1972, Customs Officers appeared and searched premises No. 35, Nalini Seth Road, Calcutta. It has been alleged that the said officers searched the concerned premises after breaking open...

Bose and Company Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 2; ;Central Excise Rules - Rule 201

Reported in : 1989(24)ECC190,1989(43)ELT404(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Sanyal, Adv.

ORDERSusanta Chatterjee, J.1. The present Rule was issued on 10th of December, 1979 at the instance of the writ petitioners praying, inter alia, for issuance of a writ of Mandamus challenging the Notification No. 176/77, dated...

Madhya Pradesh Rajya Sahakari Bank Maryadit Vs. Vijaysingh Solanki and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 41

Reported in : (1996)IIILLJ106MP; 1996(0)MPLJ547

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Sanyal, Adv., ;Raghuwanshi, Adv. For Respondents Nos. 2 and 3 and ;S.C. Bagdia, Adv. For Respondent No. 4

R.D. Shukla, J.1. By this order following .L.P As. are being disposed of. The Bank has filed appeal against 24 petitioners who have also filed separate appeals. As such, appeals filed by both the parties are...