Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s m hajarnavis · Page 1 of about 15 results (0.049 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 18 1964

Deonath Dundhnath Mishra Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-18-1964

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 5, 101, 104 and 114; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 161

Reported in : AIR1967Bom1; 1967CriLJ21

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Hajarnavis, Asst. Govt. Pleader

(1) The appellant was the reader to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Achalpur from the 29th of June 1963 till the 1st of October 1963. The complainant Ibrahim (P. W. 1), who has been holding a licence for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 1962

Sakharam Narayan Kherdekar Vs. City of Nagpur Corporation and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-25-1962

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1939; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(7), 2(8), 2(24), 2(25), 2(27), 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 18(1), 21, 22, 26, 27, 32, 34, 39, 40, 41, 42, 52, 56 and 65; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Legal Practitioners Act; Advocates Act, 1961; Bombay Shops and Establishments Rules, 1948 - Rule 5; Payment of Wages Act - Sections 38-A, 39 and 42-A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 22; Maharashtra Shops and Establishments Act, 1961; Buildings Societies Act, 1884; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2; Central Provinces and Berar Goondas Act; Punjab Shops and Establishments Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 73; Extension and Amendment Act, 1960

Reported in : AIR1964Bom200; (1963)65BOMLR627; ILR1963Bom478

Advocate for Respondent : C.S. Dharmadhikari, Adv. and ;S.M. Hajarnavis, Asst. Govt. Pleader

Abhyankar, J.1. This petition raises an interesting and an important point of interpretation, under the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. This Act has been made applicable to Vidarbha region by the Extension and Amendment Act...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 11 1968

N.J. Nayadu and Co. and ors. Vs. Administrator of the City of Nagpur a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-11-1968

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxes

Acts : City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 114, 114(1), 114(2), 114(3), 115 and 144; Nagpur Municipal Corporation Theatre Tax Rules - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 245 and 276; Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 5; Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 - Sections 229, 548 and 548(2); Indian Tariff Act, 1934 - Sections 4, 8 and 9; Sugar Industry (Protection) Act, 1932 - Sections 4; Salt (Additional Import Duty) Act, 1939 - Sections 4; Bengal Excise Act, 1909 - Sections 27; Mathches (Excise Duty) Act, 1934 - Sections 3(2) and 4; ;Madras Commercial Crops Markets Act, 1933 - Sections 11(1) and 12; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 73; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 169; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 113(2), 11

Reported in : AIR1970Bom59; (1969)71BOMLR253; ILR1970Bom68; 1969MhLJ234

Advocate for Respondent : C.S. Dharmadhikari, Adv. and ;S.M. Hajarnavis, Addl. Govt. Pleader

Abhyankar, J.1. The petitioners, 18 in number, are either Managers or proprietors of cinema houses exhibiting cinema films in the City of Nagpur. There is a Corporation constituted for the City of Nagpur under the provisions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 06 1970

Bhaskar Narayan Hardikar and anr. Vs. S.G. Daithankar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-06-1970

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 2(7), 9, 9(1), 2(49), 18, 18(1), 19, 19(1), 55(1), 51(1), 51(6), 52, 53, 55, 55(4), 313 and 321(2); Maharashtra Municipalities (Conduct of Business) Rules, 1966 - Rule 3(2); Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 - Sections 19(2), 49(7), 56(2), 63, 63(1), 65, 65(2), 81(2), 81(9), 81(14), 81(15), 87(4), 92(2) and 167; Bombay Village Panchayats Act - Sections 35(2); Constitution of India - Article 368

Reported in : AIR1971Bom188; (1971)73BOMLR851; 1970MhLJ953

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Hajarnavis, Addl. Govt. Pleader, ;P.R.K. Murty and ;B.A. Masodkar, Advs.

Padhye, J.1. In a general election held on 3-6-1967, 22 Councillors were elected to the Municipal Council, Bhandara. In the first meeting held thereafter on 2-7-1967 the petitioner No. 1 Bhaskar was elected as the President...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 1966

Hirjee Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-13-1966

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 11(4) and 27-A

Reported in : [1966]18STC460(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Hajarnavis, Additional Government Pleader

Patel, J. 1. These three petitions arise out of the C.P. and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947. The petitioner is a merchant and deals in bidi leaves at Gondia in Bhandara district. He was a registered...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 1966

Champalal Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax, Eastern Division, Nagp ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-18-1966

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act - Sections 2(13); General Clauses Act

Reported in : [1966]18STC424(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Hajarnavis, Additional Government Pleader

Patel, J.1. The petitioner challenges the orders of the Sales Tax Authorities below which had not given him a set-off in respect of certain amount of tax recovered from him by the State Government. The petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1968

Atmaram Namdeo Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-01-1968

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 6-A, 13, 37 and 164; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : AIR1969Bom189; (1969)71BOMLR105; 1969CriLJ706; ILR1969Bom334; 1968MhLJ784

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Hajarnavis, Addl. Govt. Pleader and ;Qazi, Asstt. Govt. Pleader

Abhyankar, J.1. The appellant Atmaram has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to the imprisonment for life on the allegation that he killed his own father on the night between...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 1966

Chandrakant Govind Deshmukh Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Colle ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-16-1966

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80; Madhya Pradesh Public Trusts Act, 1951 - Sections 3(2), 4, 4(1), 4(3), 5, 7, 7(1), 7(2), 8, 8(2), 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 21, 22, 27 and 28 to 38; Bhagidari and Narvadari Act - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1882 - Sections 424; Bengal Tenancy Act - Sections 95

Reported in : AIR1970Bom301

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Hajarnavis, Addl. Govt. Pleader

Tambe, C.J.1. The question that falls for consideration is whether absence of notice under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code to the State Government as well as to the Registrar of Public Trusts is fatal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 1970

Rehaman and anr. Vs. the Corporation of the City of Nagpur and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-12-1970

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7, 12, 16 and 20; City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 5(12), 6, 7, 9, 408, 409, 409(2) and 409(3); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 2(31) and 18; Bengal Municipal Act, 1932; Companies Act - Sections 446; Bengal Municipal (Amendment) Act, 1954; Rajasthan Municipalities Act - Sections 295(5);

Reported in : AIR1970Bom394; (1971)73BOMLR344; 1970CriLJ1436; 1970MhLJ618

Advocate for Respondent : C.S. Dharmadhikari, ;S.M. Hajarnavis, Advs. and ;M.M. Qazi, Asst. Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. The two accused who are aggrieved by an order passed by the special Judicial Magistrate First Class (Corporation) Nagpur and whose order is confirmed by the Additional. Sessions Judge, Nagpur, have come here in revision....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1964

Hirji Kalyanji Wadera Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-28-1964

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Proviences and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 23(7) and 27A; ;Constitution of India - Article 286(1) and 286(2)

Reported in : [1965]16STC502(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Hajarnavis, Assistant Government Pleader

Abhyankar, J.1. This order will govern the disposal of all the three references made by the Sales Tax Tribunal, Bombay, in respect of the same assessee Shri Hirji Kalyanji, at whose instance identical questions of law...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial