Advanced Search Results

Nasir Ali and Anr. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Nishi Jain, Mr. S.M. Dixit

$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 11, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 976/2015 & Crl.M.A.3632/2015 NASIR ALI & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rohil Kaliyar, Mr. Siddharth Sunewal and...

Association of Engineering Workers Vs. Iron and Metal Traders Pvt. Ltd ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 12, 12(5), 25N and 25-O

Reported in : (1998)IIILLJ436Bom

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. M. Dixit

N.D. Vyas, J. 1. By the present petition, the petitioner which is a Trade Union, registered under the Trade Unions Act, has challenged the validity of the orders dated 26th March 1992 and 10th February 1993...

Anil Harish Vs. Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 299 and 299(1)

Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR322; 2004(3)MhLj1044

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Dixit and ;Amjad Sayed, AGP in W.P. No. 1429 of 1990 and ;Haresh Jagtiani, Adv. instructed by Haresh Jagtiani and Co. for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in W.P. No. 2245 of 1999

A.P. Shah, J. 1. The petitioners are the owners of commercial units on 5th, 6th and 7th floor of Arun Chambers, Tardeo, Mumbai. The 1st respondent is the State of Maharashtra. In or about 1968 the...

Amit Kumar Vs. Indian Airlines Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 17B and 33(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR592; [2006(109)FLR387]; (2006)IILLJ699Bom; 2006(2)MhLj210

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Dixit and ;Sudeep Dasgupta, Advs.

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. Heard Mr. Singh in support of this Appeal. Mr. Dixit appears for the respondent. 2. This Appeal seeks to challenge the order dated 20th July 2005 passed by a learned Single Judge on...

Kisanlal Rajmal Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 32, 33(5) and 61(1)

Reported in : [1980]45STC88(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Dixit, Adv.

Madon, J. 1. This is a reference under section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'), made by the Sales Tax Tribunal, Bombay, at the instance of the...

Precious Gas Service and anr. Vs. Chairman, Goods Transport Labour Boa ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Mathadi Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 5

Reported in : (2003)IILLJ398Bom

Advocate for Respondent : Lata Desai, Adv. for Respondent No. 1, ;S.M. Dixit, Adv. for Respondent No. 2, ;Smita Telang, Adv. for Respondent No. 3 and ;M.S. Topkar, Adv. for Respondent No. 4

1. Rule. Returnable forthwith.2. Ms. Desai, learned counsel waives service for respondent No. 1, Mr. Dixit, learned counsel waives service for respondent No. 2, Ms. Telang, learned counsel waives service for respondent No. 3 and Mr....

N. Nageshwar Roa Vs. Ruth Moses and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 91; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rules 76 and 77

Reported in : AIR1969Bom54; (1968)70BOMLR404; ILR1968Bom768; 1968MhLJ631

Advocate for Respondent : J.S. Raymond and ;R.T. Sippy, Advs.

Patel, J.1. This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the decision of the Maharashtra Co-operative Tribunal whereby it set aside the award made by the Registrar's Nominee and remitted the...

Dhaval Subodh Parekh and Hotel Subodh Parekh Vs. Pawan Hans Ltd., a Fu ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Air Act, 1972; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 19 and 20

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR392; 2008(4)BomCR666

Advocate for Respondent : Nisha Valani, Adv. for Defendant No. 2, ;S.M. Dixit and ;Shubhangi Kamble, Advs., i/b., Chhaya Shah, Adv. for Defendant No. 1 and ;Apoorva Janvekar, Adv.

ORDERV.C. Daga, J.1. This suit is filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants claiming compensation in the sum of Rs. 50,00,000/-with interest thereon. THE FACTS:2. The factual matrix reveals that the first plaintiff is the son...

Association of Engineering Workers Vs. Permanent Magnets Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ573Bom

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Naik and ;S.M. Dixit, Advs.

ORDERAshok Agarwal, J.1. The order dated 6th December, 1991 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Labour refusing to admit in conciliation a dispute raised by the petitioner is impugned in the present petition. 2. The Assistant...

N.K. Satyadas Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1982 - Rules 4 and 10(5)

Reported in : 1989(1)BomCR416; [1989(58)FLR610]

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Dixit, Adv.

S.M. Daud, J.1. Petitioner and respondents by Counsel.2. Rule made immediately returnable and heard, Counsel for the respondents to waive service.3. Petitioner sought retirement as from 31-8-1988 A.N. on the basis of Rule 10(5)(a)(i) of the...