Advanced Search Results

Rajasthan High Court Vs. Radha Mohan Lal and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CriminalContempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2; High Court Rules - Rules 56 and 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3182; 1993(2)WLC27

Advocate for Respondent : Party-in-Person and; S.L. Yadav, Adv.

M.R. Balla, J.1. A Civil Revision Petition i.e. S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 585/1991, Rajasthan Sports Council and Ors. v. Aam Janta Shaher, Jaipur was listed before the single Bench of Justice R. S. Kejriwal on...

State of U.P. Vs. Rajendra Yadav and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4479

Advocate for Respondent : S.L. Yadav, Adv.

Onkareshwar Bhatt, J. 1. All the five accused respondents were tried for offences under Sections 148 I. P. C. Accused respondent Ram Lakhan was further tried for an offence under Section 302 (simpliciter) and the rest...

Smt. Manraji Vs. Dy. Director of Consolidation and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 9A; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 176; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC704

Advocate for Respondent : S.L. Yadav, S.C.

Krishna Murari, J. 1. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 30.4.1976, passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation,...

Ayodhya Singh and anr. Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 21, Rule 29 - Order 41, Rule 21; ;Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 229B

Reported in : 2003(4)AWC2970

Advocate for Respondent : Anuj Kumar, Addl. S.C.; ;S.L. Yadav, ;S.P. Bharti, Advs. and ;S.C.

Janardan Sahai, J. 1. A suit under Section 229B of U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act was filed by the respondent No. 4, which was dismissed by the trial court. The respondent No. 4...

Dukhi and ors. Etc. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 300, 302, 307, 323 and 326

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2534

Advocate for Respondent : V.C. Katiyar, A.G.A.

U.S. Tripathi, J 1. The above two appeals have been preferred against the judgement and order dated 5-4-1980 passed by Sri J.M. Srivastava, the then learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehpur, in Sessions Trial No. 192...

Umesh Chandra Son of Sonpal Vs. Joint Director of Consolidation,

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act - Sections 9A(2), 131, 134, 134(1), 134(2), 137, 137A, 137(1), 137(2), 246, 246(1) and 247; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22, Rule 6

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3391

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Goyal, ;Prem Babu Verma and ;Sudhir Kumar, Advs. and ;S.C.

Krishna Murari, J.1. Heard Sri S.L. Yadav learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Prem Babu Verma appearing for the respondents.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that during the consolidation operation the petitioner...

Smt. Chhanga and Another Vs. Ist Additional District Judge, Jaunpur an ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 168, 229, 229B, 299B(1), 229B(2), 229B(3), 229C and 331; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1954 - Sections 49

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC2094

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;S.H. Yadav, ;I.M. Singh and ;A.K. Yadav, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. Opposite party No. 3 had filed a suit being O. S. No. 324 of 1987 in the Court of Addl. Munsif Magistrate for cancellation of a sale deed dated 27.1.1987 with a prayer...

Subodh Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Absorption of Retrenched Employees of Government or Public Corporations in Government Service Rules, 1991 - Rule 3(1) and 3(1)A

Reported in : (2001)3UPLBEC2590

S.R. Singh, J.1. The petitioner, a retrenched employee of Census Department has instituted this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the...

Mahendra Pratap (Col.) S/O Bhawani Shankar Choudhary Vs. Sanjay S/O Go ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 31(1)(2) and 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120, 406, 420, 467, 468, 469 and 471; Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 8 Rules 1 and 9 - Order 47, Rule 1 - Order 9, Rule 7 - Order 5, Rule 1; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 54; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1955 - Rules 11(4), 20 and 27; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200

Reported in : 2006(4)MhLj429

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Purohit, Adv. For respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and ;APP for Respondent No. 4

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. This is application Under Section 15 read with Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (referred to as 1971 Act hereafter) read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner/original...

Rajendra Singh Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 103; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 162(1), 169, 193, 319, 319(1), 319(4) and 482; Indian penal Code - Sections 302

Reported in : AIR2007SC2786; 2007CriLJ4281; JT2007(9)SC613; 2008(1)OLR(SC)27; RLW2007(1)SC301; 2007(9)SCALE593

Advocate for Respondent : S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv., ; T.N. Singh, ; V.K. Singh, ;

G.P. Mathur, J.1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal, by special leave, has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 24.4.2006 of Allahabad High Court by which the petition filed by the respondent No. 2 Kapil...