Advanced Search Results

Sudhkar Laxmanrao Jadhav Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999(2)BomCR215; 1999(1)MhLj740

Advocate for Respondent : S.L. Kulkarni, Adv.

ORDERA.D. Mane, J.1. Heard Shri Potbhare, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.L. Kulkarni, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 3 insurance company.2. Rule. On request of learned Counsel for the respective parties, Rule is...

Ram S/O. Sakharam Kolekar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954 - Sections 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96

Reported in : 1993(3)BomCR714

Advocate for Respondent : P.B. Varale, A.G.P., for respondent No. 1 and ;S.L. Kulkarni, Adv. for the respondent No. 3

N.P. Chapalgaonker, J.1. This writ petition raises an important question as to whether an order passed on the basis of a compromise can be challenged in an appeal before the District Judge under section 25 of...

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shaheda ParvIn AllauddIn Kazi and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 40, 43, 147 and 147(1); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rules 2, 34, 35, 41 and 42

Reported in : 2006ACJ2734; 2008(5)MhLj689

Advocate for Respondent : Mukul Kulkarni, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7, ;D.E. Padwale, Adv. for respondent No. 8 and ;S.L. Kulkarni, Adv. for respondent No. 11

R.M. Borde, J.1. The only point that arises for consideration in the matter is whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation in respect of an insurance policy which is of the nature of trade...

M/S. Thakker Warehousing Agency Vs. Maharashtra Small Scale Industries ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

The Petitioner has challenged Award dated 8 October, 2010 passed by the sole Arbitrator, based upon the arbitration clause in the warehousing agreement dated 6 February 2001. 2 The basic case of the Petitioner as alleged...

Brijlal and anr. Vs. hotel Neelam-lodging and Boarding and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : AIR1983Bom432; 1983MhLJ300

Advocate for Respondent : N.N. Kapadia;B.N. Deshmukh,;A.M. Kapadia,;S.L. Kulkarni, ;R.D. Deshpande and;S.M. Siddique, Advs.

ORDER1. Plaintiffs' application for amendment of plaint is rejected by the learned Civil Judge. Senior Division, Aurangabad and that is why the plaintiffs have challenged that order in this Court in Revision under Section 115 of...

Shivsingh S/O Kalusingh Jonwal Vs. Marathwada University

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 20(2)

Reported in : 1986(2)BomCR17; (1986)88BOMLR58

Advocate for Respondent : S.L. Kulkarni, Adv.

V.P. Salve, J.1. The second appeal raises a substantial question of law inasmuch as the appellant having been reinstated on 25th February, 1972, could an enquiry be instituted, continued and decided against him terminating his services?...

Mansingh S/O Sajjusingh Vs. Sudhir Ganpatrao Girdhari and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 28, Rule 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 38, Rule 5; Bombay Motor Vehicles Rules, 1959 - Rules 294, 294(2) and 310

Reported in : I(1986)ACC191; 1985(2)BomCR771; 1985MhLJ659

Advocate for Respondent : S.L. Kulkarni, Adv. for respondent No. 3

S.J. Deshpande, J.1. Both these Revision Applications involve a common question in regard to the applicability of the provision of Order 38, Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code to the proceedings before the Claims Tribunal....

The Osmanabad Dist. Central Co-op. Bank Ltd. and anr. Vs. the State of ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : InsuranceConstitution

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2006Bom8

Advocate for Respondent : N.B. Khandare, AGP for Respondents 1, 4 and 5 and ;S.L. Kulkarni, Adv. for Respondent 3;Alok Sharma, SC

P.V. Hardas, J.1. The petitioners in this petition have prayed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents No. 1 to 3 to pay the insurance claim for Kharip season 1991. The petitioners have also...

D.R. Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Collector of Customs and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4417 OF2003|D.R. ENTERPRISES LTD. |.....APPELLANT(S) | |VERSUS | | |ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND ORS. |.....RESPONDENT(S) | JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.The appellant herein is...

D.R. Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Ac Customs and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 2002(103)LC495(Bombay); 2002(147)ELT3(Bom)

V.C. Daga, J.INTRODUCTION1. This petition is filed against the refusal of the Customs Authorities to allow clearance of the printing machine imported by the petitioners under the Open General License ('OGL' for short) under Appendix-I, Part-B,...