Advanced Search Results
Sri S.N. Chowdhury Vs. the State of West Bengal
Kolkata
Nov-24-2000
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and (2);; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 120B;; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 101 and 482;; Constitution of India - Article 21
(2001)1CALLT502(HC),2001(1)CHN326
Mr. S.L. Hazra and ;Mr. Debabrata Roy for ;CBI, Advs.
D.P. Sengupta, J. 1. This Is an application for quashing of a proceeding being Special Case No.2 of 1978 (arising out of R.C. 3/77 dated 14.1.77) under section 120B of the Indian Penal Code read with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGuru Prasad Biswas and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-22-1998
Constitution
Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 13, 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 31, 38(1), 39(F), 46, 51A, 226 and 300(A);; West Bengal Gambling & Prize Competition Act, 1957 - Section 2(A, B, C and D);; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 18(2), 23 and 30;; Police Act, 1861 - Sectin 49;; Gambling Act;; Hindu Law;; Race Course Betting Act, 1928;; Betting Act, 1853;; Betting (Amendment) Act, 1926;; Betting Houses Act, 1953;; Street Betting Act, 1906;; Madras Race Club (Acquisition and transfer of undertaking) Act, 1986;; Company Act, 1956;; Gaming Act, 1845 - Section 18;; Gaming (Amendment) Act, 1892 - Section 1;; Income Tax Act, 1961;; Madras City Police Act, 1888 - Sections 4, 11 and 49(A);; Madras Gaming Act, 1930;; Hyderabad Gambling Act, 1305F - Section 14
(1998)2CALLT215(HC)
Mr. Arijit Chowdhury, ;Mr. R.K. Khanna, ;Mr. L.P. Sinha Roy, ;Mr. A.K. Gandhi and ;Mr. Fazlul Haque, Advs.;Mr. S.L. Hazra and ;Mrs. Chameli Mazumdar, Advs.
S.K. Sen, J.1. In the instant writ petition the petitioners have challenged the betting and gambling of Horse Racesa) as immoral; andb) crime and social evil degenerating the Society and the Nation.The petitioners claim that they...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.B. Ojha Vs. the State and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-01-1993
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), I860 - Sections 120, 420, 468 and 471; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section 5(1) and 5(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 21; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 245(3), 325 and 360
(1993)1CALLT401(HC)
S.L. Hazra, Public Prosecutor and ;Abjihit Kr. Adday, Adv.
Rabin Bhattacharyya, J.1. This rule is issued for quashing the proceedings in Case No. 14 of 1977, pending disposal before the 2nd Special Court, Calcutta in connection with the order No. 140 dated 26.3.1990 was passed.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Nilopam Das Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anr.
Kolkata
Jun-28-1996
CriminalFera
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 3, 50 and 56; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section 5(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438 and 482
(1996)2CALLT245(HC)
S.L. Hazra and ;Ranjan Roy, Advs.
1. The petitioner, a Senior Manager of Punjab National Bank of Shakespeare Sarani Branch, Calcutta, has sought for anticipatory bail on the allegations of violating the provisions of FERA which stem from Sections 50 and 56...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAkkas Ali Alias Akkas Ali Middya Vs. State and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-29-1990
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 401 and 482; ;Evidence Act - Section 167; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148, 149, 302, 307 and 323
(1990)2CALLT298(HC)
Balai Roy and ;S.L. Hazra, Advs. and ;Tapas Chandra Kar, Adv.
Amulya Kumar Nandi, J.1. The Sessions case ended in an acquittal of 21 accused persons charged under Sections 309, 207, 323 read with Sections 149 and 148 I.P.C. The son of one of the victims in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMilan Kumar Pradhan and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Jul-27-1999
Commercial
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226
AIR1999Cal5
Anindya Mitra, ;M.M. Roy, ;A.K. Das, ;R.M. Chatterjee, ;Monika Chatterjee, ;S.L. Hazra, ;Ranjan Roy and ;A.N. Singh, Advs.
ORDER1. Both the writ applications involving same questions of fact and law were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. These two writ applications by way of Public Interest...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›