Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s kemkar · Page 1 of about 19 results (0.020 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 27 2001

Dr. Smt. Vijaya Kothalkar Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-27-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT295; 2001(3)MPLJ469

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Kemkar, Govt. Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner is hereby assailing the correctness, propriety and illegality of the judgment and order passed by the M.P. State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur (hereinafter referred to as 'SAT' for convenience) in the matter of Original...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2001

Subhash and Company Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-2001

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(3)MPLJ634; [2002]125STC460(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Kemkar, Government Adv.

>J.G. Chitre, J.1. A small point for adjudication arises and for avoiding the delay in initiating the proceedings against the appellant for which the respondents issued notices, this appeal is being heard finally at motion hearing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2003

Man Industries (India) Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-06-2003

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2003(2)MPHT367

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Kemkar, Govt. Adv. for Respondent No. 1, ;C.M. Nair, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, ;G.M. Chafekar, Sr. Adv. and ;D.S. Kale, Adv. for Respondent No. 4

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. The short question that arises for consideration in this writ is, whether respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were justified in holding that petitioner was not eligible for submitting tender pursuant to Notice Inviting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 11 2001

Vilas Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Road Trans. Corpn. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-11-2001

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2003ACJ1234

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Kemkar and ;M.L. Dhupar, Advs.

Bhawani Singh, C.J. 1. This appeal is directed against the award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mandleshwar in Claim Case No. 10 of 1994 dated 17.11.97.2. Accident took place on 17.4.1989. Two vehicles truck No. CPU...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2000

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Lalu and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-19-2000

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : III(2002)ACC599

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S.S. Kemkar

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. The decision rendered in this appeal shall also decide the other connected Misc. Appeal No. 894/1998, as both these appeals arise out of the same impugned award and in fact both these appeals...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2000

Surendra Singh Vs. M.P.S.R.T.C. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-04-2000

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : 1(2001)ACC41

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S.S. Kemkar

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. Claimant, a victim of accident and suffered injuries is dissatisfied with what is awarded to him by the Claims Tribunal. The Claims Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 2,000/-. The impugned award...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2001

Shantilal Vs. Azad Kumar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-13-2001

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : III(2002)ACC628

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S.V. Dandwate

A.M. Sapre, J.1. Claimant is in appeal against the rejection of his claim petition filed for claiming compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act arising out of an accident. The learned Member of M.A.C.T. rejected the claim...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2002

Shankar Singh Vs. Presiding Officer and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-08-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 10

Reported in : 2002(5)MPHT281

Advocate for Respondent : G.S. Patwardhan, Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. The only question involved in this writ is whether Labour Court was justified in refusing to award the back wages to the petitioner. In other words, the question that arises for consideration is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 1995

M.P.S.R.T.C. and 2 ors. Vs. Poornima and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-06-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ203MP

Advocate for Respondent : Champalal Yadav, Adv.

A.R. Tiwari, J.1. This order governs the disposal of the connected six Misc. Appeals as particularised above. These appeals are directed against the common award datedMay 2, 1991 passed in six claim cases arising out of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2000

Munni Bai (Smt.) and ors. Vs. Oriental Fire and General Assurance Co. ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-11-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2, 4A(3), 26 and 38

Reported in : 2001ACJ1216; (2001)ILLJ514MP; 2000(4)MPHT110

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Dandwate and ;A. Saraswat, Advs.

ORDER1. Admit. Heard finally since learned counsel for both parties are present and the matter requires immediate disposal.2. This appeal is directed against the order of Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Labour Court, Mandsaur dated November 6,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial