Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s kanniah · Page 1 of about 20 results (0.118 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 28 2003

S. Veerakumar Vs. State Bank of India by Its Chairman,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-28-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act; Pension Rules - Rule 8; State Bank of India Employees' Pension Fund Rules - Rules 2(2), 7, 8, 20 and 22; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules - Rule 19; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules - Rule 49; Border Security Border Rules - Rule 19; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ138Mad

Advocate for Respondent : S. Kanniah, Adv.

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J. 1. The petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the respondents relating to the payment of pension to the petitioner and quash the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 1998

Eswaran Vs. Pichayee and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-26-1998

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125, 125(3) and 127(2)

Reported in : II(1998)DMC147

Advocate for Respondent : S. Kanniah, Adv.

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. This is a case, in which the unfortunate wife and two children of the petitioner, who are the respondents herein, have been driven from pillar to post in the process of claiming maintenance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2005

Khader Ibrahim and Others Vs. J. Zeenath Bivi

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on : Feb-07-2005

Subject : Miscellaneous

Honble Shri Justice S. Jagadeesan, Chairman : Shri S. Kanniah, the learned counsel for the applicant filed a memo on behalf of the applicants stating that the parties have settled their dispute out of Court amicably...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 18 2026

Abdul Razak-Died vs Adam Sahib

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-18-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON: 12-03-2026PRONOUNCED ON : 18-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN and M.P.Nos.1 + 1 of 2010 S.A.No.171 of 2010 1.Abdul Razak (Died) … Appellant/3rd Plaintiff2. Jamila Bi3. Meharun Bi4....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2013

P.N.Krishnan Vs. R.Shanmugaraj

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-18-2013

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE :18. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL C.R.P.(PD) No.851 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 P.N.Krishnan ... Petitioner Vs 1.R.Shanmugaraj 2.M/s.DHFL Vysya Housing Finance Limited,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2000

Ramadoss G. and ors. Vs. Management of Tansi Die Castings, Industrial ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-17-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2)

Reported in : (2001)ILLJ706Mad; (2001)1MLJ123

Advocate for Respondent : M. Vijayan and S. Gopinathan, Advs.

P. Sathasivam, J.1. With regard to disallowed claim in the award passed by the First Additional Labour Court, Madras-104 in C.P. No.529 of 1991, dated November 6, 1992, the workman has filed W.P. No. 13051 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1990

R. Manohar Vs. the Deputy Director, Export Inspection Agency and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-30-1990

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1992)1MLJ155

ORDERBakthavatsalam, J.1. The prayer in the writ petition is as follows:.to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction in the nature of the writ directing the respondents to regularise the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 2026

K.Sundarapandian vs S.Ganesan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-09-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on 11.11.2025Pronounced on 09.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI S.A.No.278 of 2019 and C.M.P. No.4099 of 2019 K. Sundarapandian ...Appellant Vs. S. Ganesan … Respondent Prayer: Second...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 1999

A. Karuppanna Pillai Vs. Nallathambi and 4 Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-17-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 -- Sections 18, 19, 31, 32, 33, 35, 38, 40, 41 and 42; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1882 -- Sections 144

Reported in : 2000(1)CTC341

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. Kanniah, Adv.

ORDER1. The Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the defendant against the order of the learned District Munsif, Turaiyur, rejecting the memo filed by him taking exception to the lower court receiving the powers of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2007

M.S. Munivenkatappa Vs. State Bank of India, Rep. by Its Chief General ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-20-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226

Reported in : 2007(2)CTC135; [2007(113)FLR707]; (2007)ILLJ906Mad; (2007)3MLJ310

Advocate for Respondent : N.G.R. Prasad, Adv. for ;Row and ;Reddy, Advs. in W.A. 2945/2003 and ;S. Kanniah, Adv. in WA. 2133/2003

N. Paul Vasanthakumar, J.1. These writ appeals are directed against the order of the learned single Judge made in W.P. No. 1464 of 2001 dated 28.3.2003. W.A. No. 2133 of 2003 is filed by the employee...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial