Advanced Search Results
Ramesh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-25-2003
Narcotics
Narcotic Durgs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 2001- Sections 41 and 41(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226
2004CriLJ62; 2003(4)MPHT78
S.K. Yadav, Govt. Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;R.S. Patel Sr. Standing Counsel for Respondent No. 2
Dipak Misra, J.1. This writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was instituted at the instance of the petitioner who has been convicted under Section 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShyam Narayan Chouksey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-24-2003
Media and CommunicationConstitution
Constitution of India - Article 51A; Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 5A
AIR2003MP233; 2004(3)MPLJ216
R.S. Patel, Sr. Standing Counsel, for Nos. 1 and 2, ;Anjali Banerjee, Adv. for No. 3, ;Surendera Singh, Sr. Counsel, for Nos. 4 and 5 and ;S.K. Yadav, Amicus Curiae
Dipak Misra, J.1. In the days of yore it was vocally pronounced with immense emphasis that a drum beat may travel to a maximum limit of four miles but the utterances made by one man, through...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThan Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-30-2005
Constitution
Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 2, 5, 6, 6(2), 6A, 6B, 6C, 7, 11A, 49A, 95 and 95(1); Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Sanshodhan) Adhiniyam, 2001 - Sections 49; Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 18; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(3), 15(4), 17, 21, 29, 234G, 243, 243A, 243B, 243C, 243D, 243(G), 243H, 323(3A), 327, 329, 332, 333, 334, 371A and 371F; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438; Indian Penal Code; Madhya Pradesh Gram Sabha (Procedure of Meeting) Rules, 2001 - Rules 3, 4 and 4(1)
AIR2005MP170; 2005(2)MPLJ353
S.K. Yadav, Govt. Adv.
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. The present reference has arisen in a different factual matrix inasmuch as certain provisions of Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (for brevity 'the Act') that were incorporated by way...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shamim Ahmad (Dr.) Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Allahabad
Dec-03-2004
Civil
Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 48 and 48(2A)
2005(1)AWC963; 2005(1)ESC220; (2005)1UPLBEC171
C.B. Yadav, ;S.K. Yadav, ;V.K. Chandel, ;S.A. Ansari, Advs. and ;S.C.
Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The moot question which arises for consideration in the present writ petition is whether the removal of the petitioner as President of the Nagar Palika Parishad, Mubarakpur, District Azamgarh was in accordance with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Saraswati Pandey Vs. Secretary, State of M.P. and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-26-2004
ServiceFamily
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 125; Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 - Rules 44(5), 45, 46, 47 and 48(6)
2004(2)MPHT261
S.K. Yadav, Govt. Adv.
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1.In certain situations in life a person does not envision the disturbing future which ultimately finds its roots embedded in the incidents of the past and struggle begins in the future canvass, sometimes a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDilip Kumar Goushalawale and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
May-16-2003
CivilProperty
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 48
2003(3)MPHT217; 2003(1)MPLJ504
S.K. Yadav, Govt. Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;R.N. Singh, Sr. Adv. and ;A.P. Singh, Adv. for Respondent No. 2
Dipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, the appellants, five in number, have called in question the defensibility of the order dated 31-7-2002 passed by the learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaijnath Singh Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jun-23-2005
Civil
Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 - Sections 7, 10, 11, 12, 17 and 18(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 33; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 146
2005(4)MPHT132; 2005(3)MPLJ540
S.K. Yadav, Govt. Adv.
ORDERA.K. Shrivastava, J.1. By this writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the pregnability of the Revenue Recovery Certificate (hereinafter referred to as 'RRC') dated 19-8-99...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrecision Technofab and Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and or ...
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-16-2005
Constitution
Madhya Pradesh Uchh-Nyayalaya (Letters Patent Appeals Samapti) Adhiniyam, 1981 - Sections 1, 2 and 2(1); Government of India Act - Sections 107 and 108; Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules - Rules 10, 11 and 12; Madhya Pradesh High Court Orders; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
2006(1)MPHT246; 2004(3)MPLJ541
S.K. Yadav, Dy. Adv. General for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and ;A.K. De, Adv. for the Respondent No. 6
Dipak Misra, J.1. What would have been a matter of interesting debate as regards expressing an opinion because of the difference between two of our esteemed peers that had emerged relating to grant of State largess...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuresh Chandra Pandey Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-03-2004
Service
Madhya Pradesh Revision of Pay Rules, 1998 - Rules 10(2) and 11
2005(1)MPHT117; 2004(3)MPLJ316
S.K. Yadav, Govt. Adv.
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. The petitioner was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk on 22-8-1964 and was promoted to the post of Upper Division Clerk Grade-II on 27-7-79. He passed the Accountants Training Examination on 30-4-80 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. G.K. Kundlani Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-02-2002
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 141 and 227
2002(5)MPHT148; 2002(4)MPLJ451
S.K. Yadav, Govt. Adv.
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Sustainability of the order dated 4-5-1999 passed by the M.P. State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur (for short 'the Tribunal') in O.A. No. 1590/98 has been called in question by the petitioner invoking the extraordinary...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »