Advanced Search Results
Trivendibai Kishnrao Ghadge and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jan-09-2009
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 11, 18, 23, 24 and 25; Madhya Pradesh Town Improvement Trust Act, 1960
2009(6)BomCR484
S.K. Tambe, A.G.P.
Tated K.K., J.1. All the above three first appeals are directed against the common judgment and award dated 7th July, 2001 passed by Joint District Judge, Latur. As identical questions of facts and law arise in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPannalal Sunderlal Choksi and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.
Mumbai
Sep-14-2000
CriminalFood Adulteration
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18, 27D and 34; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7, 16 and 17; Companies Act, 1956; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 245(2), 397(2) and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 23C(2)
(2001)1BOMLR349; 2000CriLJ4442; 2000(4)MhLj674
V.D. Sapkal and ;S.K. Tambe, A.P.P.
ORDERB. B. Vagyani. J.1. Heard learned Senior Counsel Shri Shirish Gupte, with Shri B. R. Warma, learned Advocate, for the petitioners and learned A. P. P. Shri V. D. Sapkal for the respondent State in Criminal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Sahebbi Syed QayamuddIn Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Mumbai
Jul-01-1998
Service
1998(4)BomCR798
S.K. Tambe, A.G.P.
ORDERA.D. Mane, J. 1. The petitioner is an age old widow, who has filed the present writ petition, inter alia, praying to quash the order of the respondent No. 2 dated 31-1-1989 denying family pension to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ganesh Harsingh Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Mar-15-2001
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1974 - Sections 109, 494 and 495; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 177, 182, 182(2) and 201; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1978; Criminal Law Procedure Act, 1978
2002(1)MhLj74
S.K. Tambe, Additional Public Prosecutor
The Court 1. Heard Shri Chatterji, Advocate for the applicants and Shri Tambe, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State-respondent No. 2. 2. Present respondent No. 1, who claims to be first wife of petitioner, filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandrashekar Mahadappa Mitkari Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-11-2002
Trusts and Societies
Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 73ID and 154; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 57
2002(3)ALLMR876; 2002(5)BomCR594; (2002)3BOMLR319; 2003(1)MhLj587
S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. for Respondents Nos. 1 to 4, ;Prashant Deshmukh, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 and ;V.D. Salunke, Adv. for Respondents Nos. 10 and 11
D.G. Karnik, J.1. Rule returnable forthwith. By consent petition taken up for final hearing.2. This petition is filed by the petitioner who was appointed as a Chairman of respondent No. 3 Society and who has been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevidas S/O Pandit Tatar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Dec-20-2005
Service
Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 - Sections 20 and 21; Evidence Rules
2006(2)MhLj100
S.K. Tambe, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and ;V.D. Salunke, Adv. for respondent No. 6
S.P. Kukday, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of respective Advocates, the matter is taken up for hearing. Respective Advocates waive service.2. The petitioner has impugned the order dated 27-9-2005 passed by Maharashtra...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadhav Raghunath Thatte and Others Vs. Director, Directorate of Town P ...
Mumbai
Jul-10-1998
Property
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 49, 75, 113-A, 126 and 127; Constitution of India - Article 226; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6
1999(1)BomCR543
S.K. Tambe, ;Asst. G.P. and ;Anil Kasliwal, Adv.
ORDERPer A.D. Mane, J.1. In the draft Development Plan, the land Survey No. 52 i.e. City Survey No. 2000/A, present plot No. 44 was shown reserved for stadium and public garden. The Development Plan of City...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamsingh Hiralal Sulane, Aged 22 Years, Occ. Student, R/O Dongaon, Tq. ...
Mumbai
Apr-03-2002
Constitution
Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Denotified Tribes, (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000
2002(4)MhLj784
S.K. Tambe, A.G.P.
D.G. Karnik, J.1. The petitioner claims that he belongs to RajputBhamta caste/tribe, which is recognised as 'V.J.N.T.'.The petitioner obtained the caste/tribe certificate fromthe Tahsildar, Gangapur, District Aurangabad, in whichpetitioners caste/tribe was certified to be 'RajputBhamta'. On...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalpana Ananda Sutar and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Other ...
Mumbai
Jan-28-1998
Election
Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 15 and 15-A; Constitution of India - Articles 243-K, 324 and 329
1998(3)ALLMR106; 1998(3)BomCR712; 1998(2)MhLj626
V.D. Sapkal, ;S.K. Tambe and ;K.G. Patil, A.G.PS.
ORDERA.D. Mane, J.1. The central point involved in all these petitions is common and it relates to the election to Panchayat. The grievance of the petitioners is that the Returning Officer committed an error in rejecting...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaysing Daulatsing Rawal and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jan-17-2001
Criminal
Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 56; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482
2002(2)MhLj177
S.K. Tambe, A.P.P.
R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J. 1. The petitioners seek to quash the F.I.R. No. 38/99 dated 28-3-1999 lodged at Police Station, Dondaicha, District Dhule. It is the contention of the petitioners that the alleged F.I.R,, on the face...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »