Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: s k tambe · Page 1 of about 25 results (0.082 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 09 2009

Trivendibai Kishnrao Ghadge and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-09-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 11, 18, 23, 24 and 25; Madhya Pradesh Town Improvement Trust Act, 1960

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR484

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Tambe, A.G.P.

Tated K.K., J.1. All the above three first appeals are directed against the common judgment and award dated 7th July, 2001 passed by Joint District Judge, Latur. As identical questions of facts and law arise in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2000

Pannalal Sunderlal Choksi and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-14-2000

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18, 27D and 34; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7, 16 and 17; Companies Act, 1956; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 245(2), 397(2) and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 23C(2)

Reported in : (2001)1BOMLR349; 2000CriLJ4442; 2000(4)MhLj674

Advocate for Respondent : V.D. Sapkal and ;S.K. Tambe, A.P.P.

ORDERB. B. Vagyani. J.1. Heard learned Senior Counsel Shri Shirish Gupte, with Shri B. R. Warma, learned Advocate, for the petitioners and learned A. P. P. Shri V. D. Sapkal for the respondent State in Criminal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 1998

Mrs. Sahebbi Syed QayamuddIn Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-01-1998

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1998(4)BomCR798

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Tambe, A.G.P.

ORDERA.D. Mane, J. 1. The petitioner is an age old widow, who has filed the present writ petition, inter alia, praying to quash the order of the respondent No. 2 dated 31-1-1989 denying family pension to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 15 2001

Ganesh Harsingh Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-15-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1974 - Sections 109, 494 and 495; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 177, 182, 182(2) and 201; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1978; Criminal Law Procedure Act, 1978

Reported in : 2002(1)MhLj74

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Tambe, Additional Public Prosecutor

The Court 1. Heard Shri Chatterji, Advocate for the applicants and Shri Tambe, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State-respondent No. 2. 2. Present respondent No. 1, who claims to be first wife of petitioner, filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2002

Chandrashekar Mahadappa Mitkari Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-11-2002

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 73ID and 154; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 57

Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR876; 2002(5)BomCR594; (2002)3BOMLR319; 2003(1)MhLj587

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. for Respondents Nos. 1 to 4, ;Prashant Deshmukh, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 and ;V.D. Salunke, Adv. for Respondents Nos. 10 and 11

D.G. Karnik, J.1. Rule returnable forthwith. By consent petition taken up for final hearing.2. This petition is filed by the petitioner who was appointed as a Chairman of respondent No. 3 Society and who has been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2005

Devidas S/O Pandit Tatar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-20-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 - Sections 20 and 21; Evidence Rules

Reported in : 2006(2)MhLj100

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Tambe, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and ;V.D. Salunke, Adv. for respondent No. 6

S.P. Kukday, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of respective Advocates, the matter is taken up for hearing. Respective Advocates waive service.2. The petitioner has impugned the order dated 27-9-2005 passed by Maharashtra...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 1998

Madhav Raghunath Thatte and Others Vs. Director, Directorate of Town P ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-10-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 49, 75, 113-A, 126 and 127; Constitution of India - Article 226; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6

Reported in : 1999(1)BomCR543

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Tambe, ;Asst. G.P. and ;Anil Kasliwal, Adv.

ORDERPer A.D. Mane, J.1. In the draft Development Plan, the land Survey No. 52 i.e. City Survey No. 2000/A, present plot No. 44 was shown reserved for stadium and public garden. The Development Plan of City...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2002

Ramsingh Hiralal Sulane, Aged 22 Years, Occ. Student, R/O Dongaon, Tq. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-03-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Denotified Tribes, (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000

Reported in : 2002(4)MhLj784

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Tambe, A.G.P.

D.G. Karnik, J.1. The petitioner claims that he belongs to RajputBhamta caste/tribe, which is recognised as 'V.J.N.T.'.The petitioner obtained the caste/tribe certificate fromthe Tahsildar, Gangapur, District Aurangabad, in whichpetitioners caste/tribe was certified to be 'RajputBhamta'. On...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 1998

Kalpana Ananda Sutar and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Other ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-28-1998

Subject : Election

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 15 and 15-A; Constitution of India - Articles 243-K, 324 and 329

Reported in : 1998(3)ALLMR106; 1998(3)BomCR712; 1998(2)MhLj626

Advocate for Respondent : V.D. Sapkal, ;S.K. Tambe and ;K.G. Patil, A.G.PS.

ORDERA.D. Mane, J.1. The central point involved in all these petitions is common and it relates to the election to Panchayat. The grievance of the petitioners is that the Returning Officer committed an error in rejecting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2001

Jaysing Daulatsing Rawal and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-17-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 56; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2002(2)MhLj177

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Tambe, A.P.P.

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J. 1. The petitioners seek to quash the F.I.R. No. 38/99 dated 28-3-1999 lodged at Police Station, Dondaicha, District Dhule. It is the contention of the petitioners that the alleged F.I.R,, on the face...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial